PROFESSIONAL MASTER AND ITS CHALLENGES
Objective: To describe the history, origin, objectives, characteristics, implications, the questions of the evaluation form and some examples of the Professional Masters (MP), to differentiate the Academic Master, and identify the challenges for the next quadrennial assessment. Methods: The CAPES s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
|
Series: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800009&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-b525a1cdb6f64f5ba4f0910029192806 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b525a1cdb6f64f5ba4f09100291928062020-11-25T01:11:40ZengColégio Brasileiro de CirurgiõesRevista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões1809-454642suppl 191310.1590/0100-69912015S01004S0100-69912015000800009PROFESSIONAL MASTER AND ITS CHALLENGESLydia Masako FerreiraObjective: To describe the history, origin, objectives, characteristics, implications, the questions of the evaluation form and some examples of the Professional Masters (MP), to differentiate the Academic Master, and identify the challenges for the next quadrennial assessment. Methods: The CAPES site on Professional Masters and documents and meeting area of reports from 2004 to 2013 of Medicine III were read as well as the reports and the sub-page of the area in Capes site. The data relating to the evaluation process and the Scoreboard of the other areas were computed and analyzed. From these data it was detected the challenges of Medicine III for the next four years (2013-2016). Results: The creation of the Professional Master is very recent in Medicine III and no Professional Master of Medicine III course was evaluated yet. Were described the objectives, assumptions, characteristics, motivations, the possibilities, the feasibility, the profile of the students, the faculty, the curriculum, funding, intellectual production, social inclusion, the general requirements of Ordinance No. 193/2011 CAPES and some examples of proposals, technological lines of scientific activities, partnerships and counterparties. The evaluation form of the MP was discussed, the need for social, economic and political intellectual production and the differences with the MA. It was also reported the global importance of the MP and its evolution in Brazil. From the understanding of the MP, Medicine III outlined some challenges and goals to be developed in the 2013-2016 quadrennium. Conclusion: Medicine III understood the MP as a new technological scientific horizon within the strict sensu post-graduate and full consistency with the area.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800009&lng=en&tlng=enPost-graduate educationTrendsEducational evaluationHigher educationHealth research evaluationProgram evaluation and research instrumentsStaff development |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lydia Masako Ferreira |
spellingShingle |
Lydia Masako Ferreira PROFESSIONAL MASTER AND ITS CHALLENGES Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões Post-graduate education Trends Educational evaluation Higher education Health research evaluation Program evaluation and research instruments Staff development |
author_facet |
Lydia Masako Ferreira |
author_sort |
Lydia Masako Ferreira |
title |
PROFESSIONAL MASTER AND ITS CHALLENGES |
title_short |
PROFESSIONAL MASTER AND ITS CHALLENGES |
title_full |
PROFESSIONAL MASTER AND ITS CHALLENGES |
title_fullStr |
PROFESSIONAL MASTER AND ITS CHALLENGES |
title_full_unstemmed |
PROFESSIONAL MASTER AND ITS CHALLENGES |
title_sort |
professional master and its challenges |
publisher |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
series |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
issn |
1809-4546 |
description |
Objective: To describe the history, origin, objectives, characteristics, implications, the questions of the evaluation form and some examples of the Professional Masters (MP), to differentiate the Academic Master, and identify the challenges for the next quadrennial assessment. Methods: The CAPES site on Professional Masters and documents and meeting area of reports from 2004 to 2013 of Medicine III were read as well as the reports and the sub-page of the area in Capes site. The data relating to the evaluation process and the Scoreboard of the other areas were computed and analyzed. From these data it was detected the challenges of Medicine III for the next four years (2013-2016). Results: The creation of the Professional Master is very recent in Medicine III and no Professional Master of Medicine III course was evaluated yet. Were described the objectives, assumptions, characteristics, motivations, the possibilities, the feasibility, the profile of the students, the faculty, the curriculum, funding, intellectual production, social inclusion, the general requirements of Ordinance No. 193/2011 CAPES and some examples of proposals, technological lines of scientific activities, partnerships and counterparties. The evaluation form of the MP was discussed, the need for social, economic and political intellectual production and the differences with the MA. It was also reported the global importance of the MP and its evolution in Brazil. From the understanding of the MP, Medicine III outlined some challenges and goals to be developed in the 2013-2016 quadrennium. Conclusion: Medicine III understood the MP as a new technological scientific horizon within the strict sensu post-graduate and full consistency with the area. |
topic |
Post-graduate education Trends Educational evaluation Higher education Health research evaluation Program evaluation and research instruments Staff development |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800009&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lydiamasakoferreira professionalmasteranditschallenges |
_version_ |
1725170341373804544 |