Between college and work in the Further Education and Training College sector

Students studying Civil Engineering (CE) at the Further Education and Training (FET) colleges spend periods of time in the classroom and workshop as well as in the workplace during experiential learning. The overall purpose of education and training in the college sector is generally understood as p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Garraway, Joseph Bronkhorst, Sharman Wickham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Education Association of South Africa 2015-02-01
Series:South African Journal of Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-01002015000100018&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-b531c46333614b31bc62f873442085f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b531c46333614b31bc62f873442085f02020-11-24T23:14:55ZengEducation Association of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Education2076-34332015-02-013510108S0256-01002015000100018Between college and work in the Further Education and Training College sectorJames Garraway0Joseph Bronkhorst1Sharman Wickham2Cape Peninsula University of TechnologyCape Peninsula University of TechnologyCape Peninsula University of TechnologyStudents studying Civil Engineering (CE) at the Further Education and Training (FET) colleges spend periods of time in the classroom and workshop as well as in the workplace during experiential learning. The overall purpose of education and training in the college sector is generally understood as preparing students for employability, and difficulties in colleges performing this role are well known. In this article, these difficulties are examined in a novel way. The everyday perspectives of lecturers and supervisors about student learning in their college programmes and their work experience are translated into more theoretical language, using activity theory. A theoretical argument is made, which suggests that different sites of learning create different purposes, and that these different purposes derive from a distinction between knowledge and practice, which in turn has historical roots. The study concludes by suggesting that a new, common object of integrating theory and practice at all the sites would better link the college and workplace education and training systems, and tentatively suggests how this new object could be put into practice.http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-01002015000100018&lng=en&tlng=enactivity theorycivil engineeringfurther education and trainingtheory and practice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Garraway
Joseph Bronkhorst
Sharman Wickham
spellingShingle James Garraway
Joseph Bronkhorst
Sharman Wickham
Between college and work in the Further Education and Training College sector
South African Journal of Education
activity theory
civil engineering
further education and training
theory and practice
author_facet James Garraway
Joseph Bronkhorst
Sharman Wickham
author_sort James Garraway
title Between college and work in the Further Education and Training College sector
title_short Between college and work in the Further Education and Training College sector
title_full Between college and work in the Further Education and Training College sector
title_fullStr Between college and work in the Further Education and Training College sector
title_full_unstemmed Between college and work in the Further Education and Training College sector
title_sort between college and work in the further education and training college sector
publisher Education Association of South Africa
series South African Journal of Education
issn 2076-3433
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Students studying Civil Engineering (CE) at the Further Education and Training (FET) colleges spend periods of time in the classroom and workshop as well as in the workplace during experiential learning. The overall purpose of education and training in the college sector is generally understood as preparing students for employability, and difficulties in colleges performing this role are well known. In this article, these difficulties are examined in a novel way. The everyday perspectives of lecturers and supervisors about student learning in their college programmes and their work experience are translated into more theoretical language, using activity theory. A theoretical argument is made, which suggests that different sites of learning create different purposes, and that these different purposes derive from a distinction between knowledge and practice, which in turn has historical roots. The study concludes by suggesting that a new, common object of integrating theory and practice at all the sites would better link the college and workplace education and training systems, and tentatively suggests how this new object could be put into practice.
topic activity theory
civil engineering
further education and training
theory and practice
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-01002015000100018&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesgarraway betweencollegeandworkinthefurthereducationandtrainingcollegesector
AT josephbronkhorst betweencollegeandworkinthefurthereducationandtrainingcollegesector
AT sharmanwickham betweencollegeandworkinthefurthereducationandtrainingcollegesector
_version_ 1725592802775007232