Processes for Implementing Community Health Worker Workforce Development Initiatives

Introduction: The objective of this observational, cross-sectional study was to identify, document, and assess the progress made to date in implementing various processes involved in statewide community health worker (CHW) workforce development initiatives.Methods: From September 2017 to December 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Colleen Barbero, Theresa Mason, Carl Rush, Meredith Sugarman, Aunima R. Bhuiya, Erika B. Fulmer, Jill Feldstein, Naomi Cottoms, Ashley Wennerstrom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.659017/full
id doaj-b590ebb5fd334c6092fc3e58e91a14f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b590ebb5fd334c6092fc3e58e91a14f12021-06-24T05:34:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652021-06-01910.3389/fpubh.2021.659017659017Processes for Implementing Community Health Worker Workforce Development InitiativesColleen Barbero0Theresa Mason1Carl Rush2Meredith Sugarman3Aunima R. Bhuiya4Erika B. Fulmer5Jill Feldstein6Naomi Cottoms7Ashley Wennerstrom8Ashley Wennerstrom9Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United StatesCommunity Resources, LLC, San Antonio, TX, United StatesCommunity Resources, LLC, San Antonio, TX, United StatesCenter for Healthcare Value and Equity, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, United StatesInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United StatesPenn Center for Community Health Workers, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesTri-County Rural Health Network, Helena-West Helena, AR, United StatesCenter for Healthcare Value and Equity, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, United StatesDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, United StatesIntroduction: The objective of this observational, cross-sectional study was to identify, document, and assess the progress made to date in implementing various processes involved in statewide community health worker (CHW) workforce development initiatives.Methods: From September 2017 to December 2020, we developed and applied a conceptual model of processes involved in implementing statewide CHW initiatives. One or more outputs were identified for each model process and assessed across the 50 states, D.C., and Puerto Rico using peer-reviewed and gray literature available as of September 2020.Results: Twelve statewide CHW workforce development processes were identified, and 21 outputs were assessed. We found an average of eight processes implemented per state, with seven states implementing all 12 processes. As of September 2020, 45 states had a multi-stakeholder CHW coalition and 31 states had a statewide CHW organization. In 20 states CHWs were included in Medicaid Managed Care Organizations or Health Plans. We found routine monitoring of statewide CHW employment in six states.Discussion: Stakeholders have advanced statewide CHW workforce development initiatives using the processes reflected in our conceptual model. Our results could help to inform future CHW initiative design, measurement, monitoring, and evaluation efforts, especially at the state level.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.659017/fullcommunity health workerworkforce developmentpromotorapromotorcommunity health representative
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Colleen Barbero
Theresa Mason
Carl Rush
Meredith Sugarman
Aunima R. Bhuiya
Erika B. Fulmer
Jill Feldstein
Naomi Cottoms
Ashley Wennerstrom
Ashley Wennerstrom
spellingShingle Colleen Barbero
Theresa Mason
Carl Rush
Meredith Sugarman
Aunima R. Bhuiya
Erika B. Fulmer
Jill Feldstein
Naomi Cottoms
Ashley Wennerstrom
Ashley Wennerstrom
Processes for Implementing Community Health Worker Workforce Development Initiatives
Frontiers in Public Health
community health worker
workforce development
promotora
promotor
community health representative
author_facet Colleen Barbero
Theresa Mason
Carl Rush
Meredith Sugarman
Aunima R. Bhuiya
Erika B. Fulmer
Jill Feldstein
Naomi Cottoms
Ashley Wennerstrom
Ashley Wennerstrom
author_sort Colleen Barbero
title Processes for Implementing Community Health Worker Workforce Development Initiatives
title_short Processes for Implementing Community Health Worker Workforce Development Initiatives
title_full Processes for Implementing Community Health Worker Workforce Development Initiatives
title_fullStr Processes for Implementing Community Health Worker Workforce Development Initiatives
title_full_unstemmed Processes for Implementing Community Health Worker Workforce Development Initiatives
title_sort processes for implementing community health worker workforce development initiatives
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Public Health
issn 2296-2565
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Introduction: The objective of this observational, cross-sectional study was to identify, document, and assess the progress made to date in implementing various processes involved in statewide community health worker (CHW) workforce development initiatives.Methods: From September 2017 to December 2020, we developed and applied a conceptual model of processes involved in implementing statewide CHW initiatives. One or more outputs were identified for each model process and assessed across the 50 states, D.C., and Puerto Rico using peer-reviewed and gray literature available as of September 2020.Results: Twelve statewide CHW workforce development processes were identified, and 21 outputs were assessed. We found an average of eight processes implemented per state, with seven states implementing all 12 processes. As of September 2020, 45 states had a multi-stakeholder CHW coalition and 31 states had a statewide CHW organization. In 20 states CHWs were included in Medicaid Managed Care Organizations or Health Plans. We found routine monitoring of statewide CHW employment in six states.Discussion: Stakeholders have advanced statewide CHW workforce development initiatives using the processes reflected in our conceptual model. Our results could help to inform future CHW initiative design, measurement, monitoring, and evaluation efforts, especially at the state level.
topic community health worker
workforce development
promotora
promotor
community health representative
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.659017/full
work_keys_str_mv AT colleenbarbero processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT theresamason processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT carlrush processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT meredithsugarman processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT aunimarbhuiya processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT erikabfulmer processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT jillfeldstein processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT naomicottoms processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT ashleywennerstrom processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
AT ashleywennerstrom processesforimplementingcommunityhealthworkerworkforcedevelopmentinitiatives
_version_ 1721361588589428736