Romania’s Great Union and the Anti-Communist Discourse

This text re-constructs the evolution of anticommunist ideas and practices during the period of Romania’s ‘great union’, while it also sketches the international context that enabled this evolution. It is a genealogical discourse analysis that serves for a better understanding of Romania’s present p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mireanu Manuel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-12-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/auseur-2019-0011
id doaj-b5c085de191a43ccb9e1b216130e7a9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5c085de191a43ccb9e1b216130e7a9b2021-09-06T19:41:24ZengSciendoActa Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies2068-75832019-12-01161395710.2478/auseur-2019-0011auseur-2019-0011Romania’s Great Union and the Anti-Communist DiscourseMireanu Manuel0independent researcherThis text re-constructs the evolution of anticommunist ideas and practices during the period of Romania’s ‘great union’, while it also sketches the international context that enabled this evolution. It is a genealogical discourse analysis that serves for a better understanding of Romania’s present political and social climate. The political, diplomatic and military process of crafting ‘Greater Romania’ between 1918 and 1919 rested fundamentally on the anticommunist discourse. This discourse functioned as a pretext for the armed interventions in the desired territories. It also helped to securitize and pacify these three territories. The Romanian army entered Bessarabia, Bukovina, and Transylvania with the goal of protecting the local population against Bolshevik disorders and ‘anarchy’. The anticommunist discourse evolved from the panic generated by retreating Russian soldiers and the ‘anarchy’ they created towards the fear of contagion with the revolutionary ‘psychosis’. The answer to the communist threat was invariably violent and militaristic in nature. The ideas and issues raised by the communists were never legitimized as a political project but as a crime and a pathology that could destroy society. In this context, what we now refer to as ‘the Great Union’ was largely the substitution of social and economic projects with the hegemonic narrative of anti-communism.https://doi.org/10.2478/auseur-2019-0011anti-communismhistory of romaniafirst world warsecuritytransylvaniadiscourse analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mireanu Manuel
spellingShingle Mireanu Manuel
Romania’s Great Union and the Anti-Communist Discourse
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
anti-communism
history of romania
first world war
security
transylvania
discourse analysis
author_facet Mireanu Manuel
author_sort Mireanu Manuel
title Romania’s Great Union and the Anti-Communist Discourse
title_short Romania’s Great Union and the Anti-Communist Discourse
title_full Romania’s Great Union and the Anti-Communist Discourse
title_fullStr Romania’s Great Union and the Anti-Communist Discourse
title_full_unstemmed Romania’s Great Union and the Anti-Communist Discourse
title_sort romania’s great union and the anti-communist discourse
publisher Sciendo
series Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
issn 2068-7583
publishDate 2019-12-01
description This text re-constructs the evolution of anticommunist ideas and practices during the period of Romania’s ‘great union’, while it also sketches the international context that enabled this evolution. It is a genealogical discourse analysis that serves for a better understanding of Romania’s present political and social climate. The political, diplomatic and military process of crafting ‘Greater Romania’ between 1918 and 1919 rested fundamentally on the anticommunist discourse. This discourse functioned as a pretext for the armed interventions in the desired territories. It also helped to securitize and pacify these three territories. The Romanian army entered Bessarabia, Bukovina, and Transylvania with the goal of protecting the local population against Bolshevik disorders and ‘anarchy’. The anticommunist discourse evolved from the panic generated by retreating Russian soldiers and the ‘anarchy’ they created towards the fear of contagion with the revolutionary ‘psychosis’. The answer to the communist threat was invariably violent and militaristic in nature. The ideas and issues raised by the communists were never legitimized as a political project but as a crime and a pathology that could destroy society. In this context, what we now refer to as ‘the Great Union’ was largely the substitution of social and economic projects with the hegemonic narrative of anti-communism.
topic anti-communism
history of romania
first world war
security
transylvania
discourse analysis
url https://doi.org/10.2478/auseur-2019-0011
work_keys_str_mv AT mireanumanuel romaniasgreatunionandtheanticommunistdiscourse
_version_ 1717766363108343808