Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries

Abstract Background Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone subs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoon-Sang Sohn, Jong-Keon Oh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-03-01
Series:Biomaterials Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y
id doaj-b5d653bed62c46209fde1f75e6690629
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5d653bed62c46209fde1f75e66906292020-11-25T02:38:06ZengBMCBiomaterials Research2055-71242019-03-012311710.1186/s40824-019-0157-yReview of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeriesHoon-Sang Sohn0Jong-Keon Oh1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of MedicineDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of MedicineAbstract Background Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone substitutes currently available in orthopedic surgery. Main body Synthetic bone substitutes consist of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, or a combination of these minerals. Synthetic porous substitutes share several advantages over allografts, including unlimited supply, easy sterilization, and storage. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as brittle properties, variable rates of resorption, and poor performance in some clinical conditions. Recently, attention has been drawn to osteoinductive materials, such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic proteins. Conclusion Despite tremendous efforts toward developing autograft alternatives, a single ideal bone graft substitute has not been developed. The surgeon should understand the properties of each bone graft substitute to facilitate appropriate selection in each specific clinical situation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40824-019-0157-yBone graftBone substitutesBone morphogenetic protein
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hoon-Sang Sohn
Jong-Keon Oh
spellingShingle Hoon-Sang Sohn
Jong-Keon Oh
Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries
Biomaterials Research
Bone graft
Bone substitutes
Bone morphogenetic protein
author_facet Hoon-Sang Sohn
Jong-Keon Oh
author_sort Hoon-Sang Sohn
title Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries
title_short Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries
title_full Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries
title_fullStr Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries
title_full_unstemmed Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries
title_sort review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries
publisher BMC
series Biomaterials Research
issn 2055-7124
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract Background Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone substitutes currently available in orthopedic surgery. Main body Synthetic bone substitutes consist of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, or a combination of these minerals. Synthetic porous substitutes share several advantages over allografts, including unlimited supply, easy sterilization, and storage. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as brittle properties, variable rates of resorption, and poor performance in some clinical conditions. Recently, attention has been drawn to osteoinductive materials, such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic proteins. Conclusion Despite tremendous efforts toward developing autograft alternatives, a single ideal bone graft substitute has not been developed. The surgeon should understand the properties of each bone graft substitute to facilitate appropriate selection in each specific clinical situation.
topic Bone graft
Bone substitutes
Bone morphogenetic protein
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hoonsangsohn reviewofbonegraftandbonesubstituteswithanemphasisonfracturesurgeries
AT jongkeonoh reviewofbonegraftandbonesubstituteswithanemphasisonfracturesurgeries
_version_ 1724792796906258432