Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries
Abstract Background Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone subs...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Biomaterials Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y |
id |
doaj-b5d653bed62c46209fde1f75e6690629 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b5d653bed62c46209fde1f75e66906292020-11-25T02:38:06ZengBMCBiomaterials Research2055-71242019-03-012311710.1186/s40824-019-0157-yReview of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeriesHoon-Sang Sohn0Jong-Keon Oh1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of MedicineDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of MedicineAbstract Background Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone substitutes currently available in orthopedic surgery. Main body Synthetic bone substitutes consist of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, or a combination of these minerals. Synthetic porous substitutes share several advantages over allografts, including unlimited supply, easy sterilization, and storage. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as brittle properties, variable rates of resorption, and poor performance in some clinical conditions. Recently, attention has been drawn to osteoinductive materials, such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic proteins. Conclusion Despite tremendous efforts toward developing autograft alternatives, a single ideal bone graft substitute has not been developed. The surgeon should understand the properties of each bone graft substitute to facilitate appropriate selection in each specific clinical situation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40824-019-0157-yBone graftBone substitutesBone morphogenetic protein |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hoon-Sang Sohn Jong-Keon Oh |
spellingShingle |
Hoon-Sang Sohn Jong-Keon Oh Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries Biomaterials Research Bone graft Bone substitutes Bone morphogenetic protein |
author_facet |
Hoon-Sang Sohn Jong-Keon Oh |
author_sort |
Hoon-Sang Sohn |
title |
Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries |
title_short |
Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries |
title_full |
Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries |
title_fullStr |
Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries |
title_sort |
review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Biomaterials Research |
issn |
2055-7124 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with autograft harvest, various bone substitutes have been considered. This article aims to review the properties of the bone graft and various bone substitutes currently available in orthopedic surgery. Main body Synthetic bone substitutes consist of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, or a combination of these minerals. Synthetic porous substitutes share several advantages over allografts, including unlimited supply, easy sterilization, and storage. However, they also have some disadvantages, such as brittle properties, variable rates of resorption, and poor performance in some clinical conditions. Recently, attention has been drawn to osteoinductive materials, such as demineralized bone matrix and bone morphogenetic proteins. Conclusion Despite tremendous efforts toward developing autograft alternatives, a single ideal bone graft substitute has not been developed. The surgeon should understand the properties of each bone graft substitute to facilitate appropriate selection in each specific clinical situation. |
topic |
Bone graft Bone substitutes Bone morphogenetic protein |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hoonsangsohn reviewofbonegraftandbonesubstituteswithanemphasisonfracturesurgeries AT jongkeonoh reviewofbonegraftandbonesubstituteswithanemphasisonfracturesurgeries |
_version_ |
1724792796906258432 |