Survey on perceptions of Indian investigators on research ethics

Introduction: The last decade has witnessed globalization of drug development with early phase studies being increasingly placed in the developing world. Whether research related ethical principles around informed consent, adverse event (AE) reporting, post trial drug commitments and others are bei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sutinder Bindra, Puja Kochhar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Perspectives in Clinical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2010;volume=1;issue=3;spage=94;epage=97;aulast=Bindra
id doaj-b5e00bc2ebf843ee97b16dbe11ef189a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5e00bc2ebf843ee97b16dbe11ef189a2020-11-24T23:24:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsPerspectives in Clinical Research2229-34852010-01-01139497Survey on perceptions of Indian investigators on research ethicsSutinder BindraPuja KochharIntroduction: The last decade has witnessed globalization of drug development with early phase studies being increasingly placed in the developing world. Whether research related ethical principles around informed consent, adverse event (AE) reporting, post trial drug commitments and others are being observed, merits evaluation Methods: A specially designed survey questionnaire was served to 29 investigators in India, having prior experience of participating in drug development studies with pharmaceutical companies. The survey included questions on investigator profile, study design, informed consent process, safety reporting, patient and physician compensation, post trial drug commitments among others. Results: Most respondents had nearly two decades of clinical experience. Majority believed that the research they conducted was relevant to the needs of society, but wanted common research goals established between the sponsors and the community. All investigators cited their expertise, reliability, patient pool, and low costs as the principal reasons for greater placement of studies. However, very few investigators felt that all their patients in studies were "truly autonomous". Most investigators indicated confidence in the adverse event reporting ability and expressed satisfaction with their Ethics Committees. A third of investigators accepted some form of conflict of interest between their role as a physician and researcher. Opinion was divided regarding satisfaction with the post trial drug commitments of the sponsor companies. Conclusion: The survey revealed a good understanding of the ethical issues around conduct of clinical research in a developing country. The sooner ethical institutions and practices are fortified, the better it is for communities, patients, investigators and pharmaceutical sponsors.http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2010;volume=1;issue=3;spage=94;epage=97;aulast=BindraClinical Research; India; Research Ethics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sutinder Bindra
Puja Kochhar
spellingShingle Sutinder Bindra
Puja Kochhar
Survey on perceptions of Indian investigators on research ethics
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Clinical Research; India; Research Ethics
author_facet Sutinder Bindra
Puja Kochhar
author_sort Sutinder Bindra
title Survey on perceptions of Indian investigators on research ethics
title_short Survey on perceptions of Indian investigators on research ethics
title_full Survey on perceptions of Indian investigators on research ethics
title_fullStr Survey on perceptions of Indian investigators on research ethics
title_full_unstemmed Survey on perceptions of Indian investigators on research ethics
title_sort survey on perceptions of indian investigators on research ethics
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Perspectives in Clinical Research
issn 2229-3485
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Introduction: The last decade has witnessed globalization of drug development with early phase studies being increasingly placed in the developing world. Whether research related ethical principles around informed consent, adverse event (AE) reporting, post trial drug commitments and others are being observed, merits evaluation Methods: A specially designed survey questionnaire was served to 29 investigators in India, having prior experience of participating in drug development studies with pharmaceutical companies. The survey included questions on investigator profile, study design, informed consent process, safety reporting, patient and physician compensation, post trial drug commitments among others. Results: Most respondents had nearly two decades of clinical experience. Majority believed that the research they conducted was relevant to the needs of society, but wanted common research goals established between the sponsors and the community. All investigators cited their expertise, reliability, patient pool, and low costs as the principal reasons for greater placement of studies. However, very few investigators felt that all their patients in studies were "truly autonomous". Most investigators indicated confidence in the adverse event reporting ability and expressed satisfaction with their Ethics Committees. A third of investigators accepted some form of conflict of interest between their role as a physician and researcher. Opinion was divided regarding satisfaction with the post trial drug commitments of the sponsor companies. Conclusion: The survey revealed a good understanding of the ethical issues around conduct of clinical research in a developing country. The sooner ethical institutions and practices are fortified, the better it is for communities, patients, investigators and pharmaceutical sponsors.
topic Clinical Research; India; Research Ethics
url http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2010;volume=1;issue=3;spage=94;epage=97;aulast=Bindra
work_keys_str_mv AT sutinderbindra surveyonperceptionsofindianinvestigatorsonresearchethics
AT pujakochhar surveyonperceptionsofindianinvestigatorsonresearchethics
_version_ 1725558696536178688