Physical Universality, State-Dependent Dynamical Laws and Open-Ended Novelty

A major conceptual step forward in understanding the logical architecture of living systems was advanced by von Neumann with his universal constructor, a physical device capable of self-reproduction. A necessary condition for a universal constructor to exist is that the laws of physics permit physic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alyssa M. Adams, Angelica Berner, Paul C. W. Davies, Sara I. Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-09-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/19/9/461
id doaj-b5e1f6abe8fe435989b0ef216ff57d94
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5e1f6abe8fe435989b0ef216ff57d942020-11-24T23:21:45ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002017-09-0119946110.3390/e19090461e19090461Physical Universality, State-Dependent Dynamical Laws and Open-Ended NoveltyAlyssa M. Adams0Angelica Berner1Paul C. W. Davies2Sara I. Walker3Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USABeyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USABeyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USABeyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USAA major conceptual step forward in understanding the logical architecture of living systems was advanced by von Neumann with his universal constructor, a physical device capable of self-reproduction. A necessary condition for a universal constructor to exist is that the laws of physics permit physical universality, such that any transformation (consistent with the laws of physics and availability of resources) can be caused to occur. While physical universality has been demonstrated in simple cellular automata models, so far these have not displayed a requisite feature of life—namely open-ended evolution—the explanation of which was also a prime motivator in von Neumann’s formulation of a universal constructor. Current examples of physical universality rely on reversible dynamical laws, whereas it is well-known that living processes are dissipative. Here we show that physical universality and open-ended dynamics should both be possible in irreversible dynamical systems if one entertains the possibility of state-dependent laws. We demonstrate with simple toy models how the accessibility of state space can yield open-ended trajectories, defined as trajectories that do not repeat within the expected Poincaré recurrence time and are not reproducible by an isolated system. We discuss implications for physical universality, or an approximation to it, as a foundational framework for developing a physics for life.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/19/9/461open-ended evolutioninnovationphysical universalityself-referencetop-down causationcellular automata
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alyssa M. Adams
Angelica Berner
Paul C. W. Davies
Sara I. Walker
spellingShingle Alyssa M. Adams
Angelica Berner
Paul C. W. Davies
Sara I. Walker
Physical Universality, State-Dependent Dynamical Laws and Open-Ended Novelty
Entropy
open-ended evolution
innovation
physical universality
self-reference
top-down causation
cellular automata
author_facet Alyssa M. Adams
Angelica Berner
Paul C. W. Davies
Sara I. Walker
author_sort Alyssa M. Adams
title Physical Universality, State-Dependent Dynamical Laws and Open-Ended Novelty
title_short Physical Universality, State-Dependent Dynamical Laws and Open-Ended Novelty
title_full Physical Universality, State-Dependent Dynamical Laws and Open-Ended Novelty
title_fullStr Physical Universality, State-Dependent Dynamical Laws and Open-Ended Novelty
title_full_unstemmed Physical Universality, State-Dependent Dynamical Laws and Open-Ended Novelty
title_sort physical universality, state-dependent dynamical laws and open-ended novelty
publisher MDPI AG
series Entropy
issn 1099-4300
publishDate 2017-09-01
description A major conceptual step forward in understanding the logical architecture of living systems was advanced by von Neumann with his universal constructor, a physical device capable of self-reproduction. A necessary condition for a universal constructor to exist is that the laws of physics permit physical universality, such that any transformation (consistent with the laws of physics and availability of resources) can be caused to occur. While physical universality has been demonstrated in simple cellular automata models, so far these have not displayed a requisite feature of life—namely open-ended evolution—the explanation of which was also a prime motivator in von Neumann’s formulation of a universal constructor. Current examples of physical universality rely on reversible dynamical laws, whereas it is well-known that living processes are dissipative. Here we show that physical universality and open-ended dynamics should both be possible in irreversible dynamical systems if one entertains the possibility of state-dependent laws. We demonstrate with simple toy models how the accessibility of state space can yield open-ended trajectories, defined as trajectories that do not repeat within the expected Poincaré recurrence time and are not reproducible by an isolated system. We discuss implications for physical universality, or an approximation to it, as a foundational framework for developing a physics for life.
topic open-ended evolution
innovation
physical universality
self-reference
top-down causation
cellular automata
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/19/9/461
work_keys_str_mv AT alyssamadams physicaluniversalitystatedependentdynamicallawsandopenendednovelty
AT angelicaberner physicaluniversalitystatedependentdynamicallawsandopenendednovelty
AT paulcwdavies physicaluniversalitystatedependentdynamicallawsandopenendednovelty
AT saraiwalker physicaluniversalitystatedependentdynamicallawsandopenendednovelty
_version_ 1725570134623387648