Revolutionary Laughter: The Aesthetico-Political Meaning of Benjamin’s Chaplin

This paper discusses the aesthetic and political motivations of the great importance that Walter Benjamin gives to Charlie Chaplin in Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit (1935-1936). First, it proceeds to identify the main paragraphs that Benjamin devoted to Chaplin’s f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ricardo Ibarlucía
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2019-11-01
Series:Aisthesis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/10732
id doaj-b5f05fb2e03d4384ba12fb5005db56b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5f05fb2e03d4384ba12fb5005db56b62020-11-25T00:14:27ZengFirenze University PressAisthesis2035-84662019-11-0112210.13128/Aisthesis-10732Revolutionary Laughter: The Aesthetico-Political Meaning of Benjamin’s ChaplinRicardo Ibarlucía0Instituto de Filosofía Ezequiel de Olaso (CIF-CONICET) and Universidad Nacional de San Martín This paper discusses the aesthetic and political motivations of the great importance that Walter Benjamin gives to Charlie Chaplin in Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit (1935-1936). First, it proceeds to identify the main paragraphs that Benjamin devoted to Chaplin’s films in the different versions of his famous essay. Then it examines Chaplin’s reception in Weimar Germany both in the field of avant-garde art and that of press criticism, highlighting the philosophical, ethico-political and psychological arguments exchanged in a wide and intensive debate on the human dimension of the Tramp character. By focusing on Sigried Kracauaer’s and Rudolf Arnheim’s chronicles, it seeks to illustrate two approaches that are contemporaries to Benjamin’s Rückblick auf Chaplin (1929), a brief review based on an essay written by the French surrealist poet Philippe Soupault. Lastly, it analyzes some notes on Charlot’s gestuality discarded from this famous essay and a fragment in which, six years before The Great Dictator (1940), Benjamin compares Chaplin to Hitler. https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/10732Film art, Chaplin’s reception in Weimar Culture, German avant-garde, Humor, Hitler.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ricardo Ibarlucía
spellingShingle Ricardo Ibarlucía
Revolutionary Laughter: The Aesthetico-Political Meaning of Benjamin’s Chaplin
Aisthesis
Film art, Chaplin’s reception in Weimar Culture, German avant-garde, Humor, Hitler.
author_facet Ricardo Ibarlucía
author_sort Ricardo Ibarlucía
title Revolutionary Laughter: The Aesthetico-Political Meaning of Benjamin’s Chaplin
title_short Revolutionary Laughter: The Aesthetico-Political Meaning of Benjamin’s Chaplin
title_full Revolutionary Laughter: The Aesthetico-Political Meaning of Benjamin’s Chaplin
title_fullStr Revolutionary Laughter: The Aesthetico-Political Meaning of Benjamin’s Chaplin
title_full_unstemmed Revolutionary Laughter: The Aesthetico-Political Meaning of Benjamin’s Chaplin
title_sort revolutionary laughter: the aesthetico-political meaning of benjamin’s chaplin
publisher Firenze University Press
series Aisthesis
issn 2035-8466
publishDate 2019-11-01
description This paper discusses the aesthetic and political motivations of the great importance that Walter Benjamin gives to Charlie Chaplin in Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit (1935-1936). First, it proceeds to identify the main paragraphs that Benjamin devoted to Chaplin’s films in the different versions of his famous essay. Then it examines Chaplin’s reception in Weimar Germany both in the field of avant-garde art and that of press criticism, highlighting the philosophical, ethico-political and psychological arguments exchanged in a wide and intensive debate on the human dimension of the Tramp character. By focusing on Sigried Kracauaer’s and Rudolf Arnheim’s chronicles, it seeks to illustrate two approaches that are contemporaries to Benjamin’s Rückblick auf Chaplin (1929), a brief review based on an essay written by the French surrealist poet Philippe Soupault. Lastly, it analyzes some notes on Charlot’s gestuality discarded from this famous essay and a fragment in which, six years before The Great Dictator (1940), Benjamin compares Chaplin to Hitler.
topic Film art, Chaplin’s reception in Weimar Culture, German avant-garde, Humor, Hitler.
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/10732
work_keys_str_mv AT ricardoibarlucia revolutionarylaughtertheaestheticopoliticalmeaningofbenjaminschaplin
_version_ 1725390332926885888