Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment

Background: Patients with outpatient commitment have a decision on coercive treatment from the specialist health services even if they are in their own home and receive municipal health services. Objective: The aim of this study is to gain more knowledge about how the outpatient commitment system wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Løvsletten, Tonje Lossius Husum, Elisabeth Haug, Arild Granerud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-05-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120926410
id doaj-b601a7fb4cfa45a2b34a329d90c32379
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b601a7fb4cfa45a2b34a329d90c323792020-11-25T03:12:03ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212020-05-01810.1177/2050312120926410Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitmentMaria Løvsletten0Tonje Lossius Husum1Elisabeth Haug2Arild Granerud3Institute for Health & Society, Universitet I Oslo, Oslo, NorwayCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute for Health & Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDivision of Mental Health Care, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Reinsvoll, NorwayFaculty of Public Health, Inland Norway University of Applied Science, Elverum, NorwayBackground: Patients with outpatient commitment have a decision on coercive treatment from the specialist health services even if they are in their own home and receive municipal health services. Objective: The aim of this study is to gain more knowledge about how the outpatient commitment system works in the municipal health service and specialist health services, and how they collaborate with patients and across service levels from the perspectives of healthcare professionals. Methods: This is a qualitative study collecting data through focus group interviews with health personnel from the municipal health service and specialist health services. Results: The results describe the health personnel’s experiences with follow-up and interactions with the patients with outpatient commitment decisions, and their experiences with collaboration between service levels. Conclusion: The study show that outpatient commitment makes a difference in the way patients with this decision are followed up. The legislative amendment with new requirements for consent competence was challenging. Collaboration between services levels was also challenging.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120926410
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Løvsletten
Tonje Lossius Husum
Elisabeth Haug
Arild Granerud
spellingShingle Maria Løvsletten
Tonje Lossius Husum
Elisabeth Haug
Arild Granerud
Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment
SAGE Open Medicine
author_facet Maria Løvsletten
Tonje Lossius Husum
Elisabeth Haug
Arild Granerud
author_sort Maria Løvsletten
title Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment
title_short Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment
title_full Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment
title_fullStr Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment
title_full_unstemmed Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment
title_sort cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medicine
issn 2050-3121
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Background: Patients with outpatient commitment have a decision on coercive treatment from the specialist health services even if they are in their own home and receive municipal health services. Objective: The aim of this study is to gain more knowledge about how the outpatient commitment system works in the municipal health service and specialist health services, and how they collaborate with patients and across service levels from the perspectives of healthcare professionals. Methods: This is a qualitative study collecting data through focus group interviews with health personnel from the municipal health service and specialist health services. Results: The results describe the health personnel’s experiences with follow-up and interactions with the patients with outpatient commitment decisions, and their experiences with collaboration between service levels. Conclusion: The study show that outpatient commitment makes a difference in the way patients with this decision are followed up. The legislative amendment with new requirements for consent competence was challenging. Collaboration between services levels was also challenging.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120926410
work_keys_str_mv AT marialøvsletten cooperationinthementalhealthtreatmentofpatientswithoutpatientcommitment
AT tonjelossiushusum cooperationinthementalhealthtreatmentofpatientswithoutpatientcommitment
AT elisabethhaug cooperationinthementalhealthtreatmentofpatientswithoutpatientcommitment
AT arildgranerud cooperationinthementalhealthtreatmentofpatientswithoutpatientcommitment
_version_ 1724651712224952320