Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins

The quantitive revolution in geography was the methodological expression of a shift in paradigm. Nomological thinking took over from the idiographic approach of classic geography. The classic paradigm had been that of a desirable identity of concrete working, active humans with their concrete natura...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: U. Eisel
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Geographica Helvetica
Online Access:http://www.geogr-helv.net/72/55/2017/gh-72-55-2017.pdf
id doaj-b65195ebaff54ca2bf0de3fa58e7a32e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b65195ebaff54ca2bf0de3fa58e7a32e2020-11-25T00:31:19ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982017-01-01721556410.5194/gh-72-55-2017Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die &bdquo;Quantitative Revolution&ldquo; der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen BewusstseinsU. Eisel0ehemals: Kulturgeschichte der Natur, Fachbereich 14 Landschaftsentwicklung, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, GermanyThe quantitive revolution in geography was the methodological expression of a shift in paradigm. Nomological thinking took over from the idiographic approach of classic geography. The classic paradigm had been that of a desirable identity of concrete working, active humans with their concrete natural surroundings: landscape was imagined as <i>Lebensraum</i>. The logic of industrial production processes contrasts with this; it creates an identity of scientifically analysed human work sequences with machines, and it thus represents a form of adapting to nature by abstracting holistically integrated ways of carrying out work. The geographical paradigm had no theoretical tools with which to approach this relationship between humans and nature. With regard to the theoretical ideas underlying it, this methodological change corresponds, on the one hand, to the transition from following a humanist concept of the individual, which guides idiographic thinking, to using a democratic concept of the individual, which correlates with the principles of experiment-based empirical sciences. On the other hand, geography's move towards an abstract concept of space reflects the degree to which industrial production methods are abstracted. The <q>spatial approach</q>, the <q>behavioural approach</q>, and <q>humanistic geography</q> are interpreted and contrasted with the idiographic paradigm within this coordinate system.http://www.geogr-helv.net/72/55/2017/gh-72-55-2017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author U. Eisel
spellingShingle U. Eisel
Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die &bdquo;Quantitative Revolution&ldquo; der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins
Geographica Helvetica
author_facet U. Eisel
author_sort U. Eisel
title Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die &bdquo;Quantitative Revolution&ldquo; der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins
title_short Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die &bdquo;Quantitative Revolution&ldquo; der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins
title_full Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die &bdquo;Quantitative Revolution&ldquo; der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins
title_fullStr Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die &bdquo;Quantitative Revolution&ldquo; der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins
title_full_unstemmed Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die &bdquo;Quantitative Revolution&ldquo; der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins
title_sort ökonomische und politische prinzipien im umbruch: die &bdquo;quantitative revolution&ldquo; der geographie als spiegel bürgerlichen bewusstseins
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geographica Helvetica
issn 0016-7312
2194-8798
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The quantitive revolution in geography was the methodological expression of a shift in paradigm. Nomological thinking took over from the idiographic approach of classic geography. The classic paradigm had been that of a desirable identity of concrete working, active humans with their concrete natural surroundings: landscape was imagined as <i>Lebensraum</i>. The logic of industrial production processes contrasts with this; it creates an identity of scientifically analysed human work sequences with machines, and it thus represents a form of adapting to nature by abstracting holistically integrated ways of carrying out work. The geographical paradigm had no theoretical tools with which to approach this relationship between humans and nature. With regard to the theoretical ideas underlying it, this methodological change corresponds, on the one hand, to the transition from following a humanist concept of the individual, which guides idiographic thinking, to using a democratic concept of the individual, which correlates with the principles of experiment-based empirical sciences. On the other hand, geography's move towards an abstract concept of space reflects the degree to which industrial production methods are abstracted. The <q>spatial approach</q>, the <q>behavioural approach</q>, and <q>humanistic geography</q> are interpreted and contrasted with the idiographic paradigm within this coordinate system.
url http://www.geogr-helv.net/72/55/2017/gh-72-55-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ueisel okonomischeundpolitischeprinzipienimumbruchdiebdquoquantitativerevolutionldquodergeographiealsspiegelburgerlichenbewusstseins
_version_ 1725322676568850432