Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins
The quantitive revolution in geography was the methodological expression of a shift in paradigm. Nomological thinking took over from the idiographic approach of classic geography. The classic paradigm had been that of a desirable identity of concrete working, active humans with their concrete natura...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Geographica Helvetica |
Online Access: | http://www.geogr-helv.net/72/55/2017/gh-72-55-2017.pdf |
id |
doaj-b65195ebaff54ca2bf0de3fa58e7a32e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b65195ebaff54ca2bf0de3fa58e7a32e2020-11-25T00:31:19ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982017-01-01721556410.5194/gh-72-55-2017Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen BewusstseinsU. Eisel0ehemals: Kulturgeschichte der Natur, Fachbereich 14 Landschaftsentwicklung, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, GermanyThe quantitive revolution in geography was the methodological expression of a shift in paradigm. Nomological thinking took over from the idiographic approach of classic geography. The classic paradigm had been that of a desirable identity of concrete working, active humans with their concrete natural surroundings: landscape was imagined as <i>Lebensraum</i>. The logic of industrial production processes contrasts with this; it creates an identity of scientifically analysed human work sequences with machines, and it thus represents a form of adapting to nature by abstracting holistically integrated ways of carrying out work. The geographical paradigm had no theoretical tools with which to approach this relationship between humans and nature. With regard to the theoretical ideas underlying it, this methodological change corresponds, on the one hand, to the transition from following a humanist concept of the individual, which guides idiographic thinking, to using a democratic concept of the individual, which correlates with the principles of experiment-based empirical sciences. On the other hand, geography's move towards an abstract concept of space reflects the degree to which industrial production methods are abstracted. The <q>spatial approach</q>, the <q>behavioural approach</q>, and <q>humanistic geography</q> are interpreted and contrasted with the idiographic paradigm within this coordinate system.http://www.geogr-helv.net/72/55/2017/gh-72-55-2017.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
U. Eisel |
spellingShingle |
U. Eisel Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins Geographica Helvetica |
author_facet |
U. Eisel |
author_sort |
U. Eisel |
title |
Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins |
title_short |
Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins |
title_full |
Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins |
title_fullStr |
Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ökonomische und politische Prinzipien im Umbruch: die „Quantitative Revolution“ der Geographie als Spiegel bürgerlichen Bewusstseins |
title_sort |
ökonomische und politische prinzipien im umbruch: die „quantitative revolution“ der geographie als spiegel bürgerlichen bewusstseins |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geographica Helvetica |
issn |
0016-7312 2194-8798 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
The quantitive revolution in geography was the methodological expression of a
shift in paradigm. Nomological thinking took over from the idiographic
approach of classic geography. The classic paradigm had been that of a
desirable identity of concrete working, active humans with their concrete
natural surroundings: landscape was imagined as <i>Lebensraum</i>. The
logic of industrial production processes contrasts with this; it creates an
identity of scientifically analysed human work sequences with machines, and
it thus represents a form of adapting to nature by abstracting holistically integrated ways of carrying
out work. The geographical paradigm had no theoretical tools with which to
approach this relationship between humans and nature. With regard to the
theoretical ideas underlying it, this methodological change corresponds, on
the one hand, to the transition from following a humanist concept of the
individual, which guides idiographic thinking, to using a democratic concept
of the individual, which correlates with the principles of experiment-based
empirical sciences. On the other hand, geography's move towards an abstract
concept of space reflects the degree to which industrial production methods
are abstracted. The <q>spatial approach</q>, the <q>behavioural approach</q>, and
<q>humanistic geography</q> are interpreted and contrasted with the idiographic
paradigm within this coordinate system. |
url |
http://www.geogr-helv.net/72/55/2017/gh-72-55-2017.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ueisel okonomischeundpolitischeprinzipienimumbruchdiebdquoquantitativerevolutionldquodergeographiealsspiegelburgerlichenbewusstseins |
_version_ |
1725322676568850432 |