A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems in Vivo: A Preliminary Study

The aim of this study was to compare the isolation systems OptraDam® Plus and OptiDam™ with the conventional rubber dam in terms of objective and subjective parameters. The isolation systems were applied during the dental treatment of the patients. The time of preparation, placement, presence and re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Kapitán, Tereza Suchánková Kleplová, Jakub Suchánek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karolinum Press 2015-07-01
Series:Acta Medica
Subjects:
id doaj-b66770d3805a4d7796c8133411512196
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b66770d3805a4d7796c81334115121962020-11-25T00:43:19ZengKarolinum PressActa Medica1211-42861805-96942015-07-01581152010.14712/18059694.2015.862763A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems in Vivo: A Preliminary StudyMartin KapitánTereza Suchánková KleplováJakub SuchánekThe aim of this study was to compare the isolation systems OptraDam® Plus and OptiDam™ with the conventional rubber dam in terms of objective and subjective parameters. The isolation systems were applied during the dental treatment of the patients. The time of preparation, placement, presence and removal were measured and the quality of isolation was evaluated. The median time of rubber dam placement was 76 s (Q1 = 62 s; Q3 = 111.25 s). The application time of OptraDam® Plus was significantly longer compared to the other systems (P < 0.001). The median volume of fluid remaining in the isolated space after 5 minutes was 4.9 mL (Q1 = 4 mL; Q3 = 5 mL). The differences between the systems with regards to isolation quality were not statistically significant. The majority of the patients reported a higher level of comfort during the treatment with a rubber dam than without it. The attitude of patients was not affected by any of the observed factors. The ranking of the isolation systems according to the subjective evaluation by the patients was (from best to worst) OptiDam™, conventional rubber dam, OptraDam® plus. The results presented in this study could guide clinicians for choosing the most appropriate isolation system.Dental equipmentIsolation qualityOperation fieldRubber dam
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Kapitán
Tereza Suchánková Kleplová
Jakub Suchánek
spellingShingle Martin Kapitán
Tereza Suchánková Kleplová
Jakub Suchánek
A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems in Vivo: A Preliminary Study
Acta Medica
Dental equipment
Isolation quality
Operation field
Rubber dam
author_facet Martin Kapitán
Tereza Suchánková Kleplová
Jakub Suchánek
author_sort Martin Kapitán
title A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems in Vivo: A Preliminary Study
title_short A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems in Vivo: A Preliminary Study
title_full A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems in Vivo: A Preliminary Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems in Vivo: A Preliminary Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems in Vivo: A Preliminary Study
title_sort comparison of three rubber dam systems in vivo: a preliminary study
publisher Karolinum Press
series Acta Medica
issn 1211-4286
1805-9694
publishDate 2015-07-01
description The aim of this study was to compare the isolation systems OptraDam® Plus and OptiDam™ with the conventional rubber dam in terms of objective and subjective parameters. The isolation systems were applied during the dental treatment of the patients. The time of preparation, placement, presence and removal were measured and the quality of isolation was evaluated. The median time of rubber dam placement was 76 s (Q1 = 62 s; Q3 = 111.25 s). The application time of OptraDam® Plus was significantly longer compared to the other systems (P < 0.001). The median volume of fluid remaining in the isolated space after 5 minutes was 4.9 mL (Q1 = 4 mL; Q3 = 5 mL). The differences between the systems with regards to isolation quality were not statistically significant. The majority of the patients reported a higher level of comfort during the treatment with a rubber dam than without it. The attitude of patients was not affected by any of the observed factors. The ranking of the isolation systems according to the subjective evaluation by the patients was (from best to worst) OptiDam™, conventional rubber dam, OptraDam® plus. The results presented in this study could guide clinicians for choosing the most appropriate isolation system.
topic Dental equipment
Isolation quality
Operation field
Rubber dam
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkapitan acomparisonofthreerubberdamsystemsinvivoapreliminarystudy
AT terezasuchankovakleplova acomparisonofthreerubberdamsystemsinvivoapreliminarystudy
AT jakubsuchanek acomparisonofthreerubberdamsystemsinvivoapreliminarystudy
AT martinkapitan comparisonofthreerubberdamsystemsinvivoapreliminarystudy
AT terezasuchankovakleplova comparisonofthreerubberdamsystemsinvivoapreliminarystudy
AT jakubsuchanek comparisonofthreerubberdamsystemsinvivoapreliminarystudy
_version_ 1725279071815860224