With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad (Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom)

<p>This case note addresses the recent European Court of Human Rights case <em>Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom</em>. In this case, the Court decided that the act of detaining and interning the applicant in Iraq was attributable to the United Kingdom, and not the United Nations, and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laura Henderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2012-02-01
Series:Merkourios
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.merkourios.org/index.php/mj/article/view/42
id doaj-b6952353f70c4e44bc4d928ee4986ee9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b6952353f70c4e44bc4d928ee4986ee92020-11-25T02:00:33ZengUbiquity PressMerkourios0927-460X2012-02-0128745056With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad (Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom)Laura Henderson<p>This case note addresses the recent European Court of Human Rights case <em>Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom</em>. In this case, the Court decided that the act of detaining and interning the applicant in Iraq was attributable to the United Kingdom, and not the United Nations, and that the applicant fell under the UK's jurisdiction. Having established jurisdiction, the Court addressed whether Al-Jedda's internment violated Article 5(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. In order to answer this, the Court had to decide whether Article 103 of the UN Charter, together with a UN Security Council Resolution authorizing the UK (among other States) to secure and maintain security in Iraq, entailed a conflict of norms that resulted in the inapplicability of the ECHR's right to liberty. The Court concluded that no such conflict was present and, thus, that the UK had violated the right to liberty. </p>http://www.merkourios.org/index.php/mj/article/view/42Attribution, Conflict of Norms, European Court of Human Rights, Iraq War, Jurisdiction, United Nations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Henderson
spellingShingle Laura Henderson
With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad (Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom)
Merkourios
Attribution, Conflict of Norms, European Court of Human Rights, Iraq War, Jurisdiction, United Nations
author_facet Laura Henderson
author_sort Laura Henderson
title With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad (Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom)
title_short With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad (Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom)
title_full With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad (Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom)
title_fullStr With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad (Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom)
title_full_unstemmed With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad (Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom)
title_sort with (great) power comes (great) responsibility: a move toward greater responsibility for states exercising power abroad (al-jedda v the united kingdom)
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Merkourios
issn 0927-460X
publishDate 2012-02-01
description <p>This case note addresses the recent European Court of Human Rights case <em>Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom</em>. In this case, the Court decided that the act of detaining and interning the applicant in Iraq was attributable to the United Kingdom, and not the United Nations, and that the applicant fell under the UK's jurisdiction. Having established jurisdiction, the Court addressed whether Al-Jedda's internment violated Article 5(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. In order to answer this, the Court had to decide whether Article 103 of the UN Charter, together with a UN Security Council Resolution authorizing the UK (among other States) to secure and maintain security in Iraq, entailed a conflict of norms that resulted in the inapplicability of the ECHR's right to liberty. The Court concluded that no such conflict was present and, thus, that the UK had violated the right to liberty. </p>
topic Attribution, Conflict of Norms, European Court of Human Rights, Iraq War, Jurisdiction, United Nations
url http://www.merkourios.org/index.php/mj/article/view/42
work_keys_str_mv AT laurahenderson withgreatpowercomesgreatresponsibilityamovetowardgreaterresponsibilityforstatesexercisingpowerabroadaljeddavtheunitedkingdom
_version_ 1724959797471608832