Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism

This article discusses the law and practice of Muslim marriages and their registration in Indonesia. The central question is to what extent these accommodate the rights and needs of poor women. A historical overview of state involvement in marriage regulation demonstrates how the women’s rights disc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adriaan Bedner, Stijn van Huis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2010-06-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.130/
id doaj-b6f35e064b0e4ddaac467b3e7ed7e6b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b6f35e064b0e4ddaac467b3e7ed7e6b32020-11-25T03:41:52ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2010-06-016217519110.18352/ulr.130130Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatismAdriaan BednerStijn van HuisThis article discusses the law and practice of Muslim marriages and their registration in Indonesia. The central question is to what extent these accommodate the rights and needs of poor women. A historical overview of state involvement in marriage regulation demonstrates how the women’s rights discourse has been largely replaced by one based on Islamic law, but that nonetheless women’s rights in marriage have been substantively reinforced. The next part discusses the control of Muslim marriage in practice, by focusing on the registration of marriage and divorce. It shows how informal practices at the lowest level of the state and state courts serving as a safety net protect the rights of poor women in practice much more effectively than is often assumed. These findings undermine the assumptions underlying the current emphasis by national women’s rights groups and donors on extending state registration and criminalising non-registration. This emphasis on the juridification of people’s lives by casting the issue essentially in terms of human rights and remedies may in fact even lead to the opposite of what it aims to achieve: more liberty for women to dispose of their own lives.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.130/Islamic lawmarriage lawIndonesiareligious courtswomen’s rightsdevelopment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adriaan Bedner
Stijn van Huis
spellingShingle Adriaan Bedner
Stijn van Huis
Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism
Utrecht Law Review
Islamic law
marriage law
Indonesia
religious courts
women’s rights
development
author_facet Adriaan Bedner
Stijn van Huis
author_sort Adriaan Bedner
title Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism
title_short Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism
title_full Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism
title_fullStr Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism
title_full_unstemmed Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism
title_sort plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for muslims in indonesia: a plea for pragmatism
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2010-06-01
description This article discusses the law and practice of Muslim marriages and their registration in Indonesia. The central question is to what extent these accommodate the rights and needs of poor women. A historical overview of state involvement in marriage regulation demonstrates how the women’s rights discourse has been largely replaced by one based on Islamic law, but that nonetheless women’s rights in marriage have been substantively reinforced. The next part discusses the control of Muslim marriage in practice, by focusing on the registration of marriage and divorce. It shows how informal practices at the lowest level of the state and state courts serving as a safety net protect the rights of poor women in practice much more effectively than is often assumed. These findings undermine the assumptions underlying the current emphasis by national women’s rights groups and donors on extending state registration and criminalising non-registration. This emphasis on the juridification of people’s lives by casting the issue essentially in terms of human rights and remedies may in fact even lead to the opposite of what it aims to achieve: more liberty for women to dispose of their own lives.
topic Islamic law
marriage law
Indonesia
religious courts
women’s rights
development
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.130/
work_keys_str_mv AT adriaanbedner pluralityofmarriagelawandmarriageregistrationformuslimsinindonesiaapleaforpragmatism
AT stijnvanhuis pluralityofmarriagelawandmarriageregistrationformuslimsinindonesiaapleaforpragmatism
_version_ 1724527788646465536