Comparative Efficacy of Metacognitive therapy versus Cognitive-Behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsession

Background: Due to the complex nature and varied symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder, different treatments have been used for OCD. Objective: The aim of this study was comparing the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) and meta-cognitive therapy (MCT) on reducing metacognitive belie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatemeh Ayetmehr, Saman Sadeghpour
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Kurdistan University of Medical Scienses 2018-04-01
Series:روانشناسی و روانپزشکی شناخت
Subjects:
Online Access:http://shenakht.muk.ac.ir/article-1-379-en.pdf
id doaj-b70ce875545c4937853b61edc67dd727
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b70ce875545c4937853b61edc67dd7272020-11-25T00:28:40ZfasKurdistan University of Medical Sciensesروانشناسی و روانپزشکی شناخت2588-66572476-29622018-04-015111710.29252/shenakht.5.1.1Comparative Efficacy of Metacognitive therapy versus Cognitive-Behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsessionFatemeh Ayetmehr0 Saman Sadeghpour1MSc. in Clinical Psychology, Kharazmi UniversityMSc in Clinical Psychology, Kharazmi UniversityBackground: Due to the complex nature and varied symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder, different treatments have been used for OCD. Objective: The aim of this study was comparing the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) and meta-cognitive therapy (MCT) on reducing metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, internal stop signals and control/threat beliefs. Method: To do so, 6 women with OCD (pure washing), were selected based on the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID), and were assigned randomly to CBT or MCT group. In each group, patients received the relevant therapies in 12 one-hour sessions. Research tools included Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI-R), stop signals questionnaire (SSQ), thought fusion inventory (TFI) and metacognition questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) that were completed by patients in pretest, posttest, follow up 1 and follow up 2. Finally, data was analyzed both individually and in group. In individual analysis, we used diagrams, visual analysis and calculating the effect size, while in group analysis, the analysis of variance with one between group factor (two group of therapies) and one within group factor (time of tests) was used. Result: The results indicated that metacognitive therapy was more effective than cognitivebehavioral therapy in reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs and internal stop signals. However, cognitive-behavioral therapy was more effective than metacognitive therapy in reducing the control/threat beliefs. Conclusion: Considering these results, it can be suggested that overall, metacognitive therapy is more appropriate for reducing the obsessive symptoms. However, definitive conclusion about the efficacy of these therapies requires more studies.http://shenakht.muk.ac.ir/article-1-379-en.pdfobsessionmetacognitive therapycognitive-behavioral therapyfusion beliesinternal stop signal
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fatemeh Ayetmehr
Saman Sadeghpour
spellingShingle Fatemeh Ayetmehr
Saman Sadeghpour
Comparative Efficacy of Metacognitive therapy versus Cognitive-Behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsession
روانشناسی و روانپزشکی شناخت
obsession
metacognitive therapy
cognitive-behavioral therapy
fusion belies
internal stop signal
author_facet Fatemeh Ayetmehr
Saman Sadeghpour
author_sort Fatemeh Ayetmehr
title Comparative Efficacy of Metacognitive therapy versus Cognitive-Behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsession
title_short Comparative Efficacy of Metacognitive therapy versus Cognitive-Behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsession
title_full Comparative Efficacy of Metacognitive therapy versus Cognitive-Behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsession
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of Metacognitive therapy versus Cognitive-Behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsession
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of Metacognitive therapy versus Cognitive-Behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsession
title_sort comparative efficacy of metacognitive therapy versus cognitive-behavioral therapy on reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, stop signals and control/threat beliefs in patient with washing obsession
publisher Kurdistan University of Medical Scienses
series روانشناسی و روانپزشکی شناخت
issn 2588-6657
2476-2962
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Background: Due to the complex nature and varied symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder, different treatments have been used for OCD. Objective: The aim of this study was comparing the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) and meta-cognitive therapy (MCT) on reducing metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs, internal stop signals and control/threat beliefs. Method: To do so, 6 women with OCD (pure washing), were selected based on the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID), and were assigned randomly to CBT or MCT group. In each group, patients received the relevant therapies in 12 one-hour sessions. Research tools included Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI-R), stop signals questionnaire (SSQ), thought fusion inventory (TFI) and metacognition questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) that were completed by patients in pretest, posttest, follow up 1 and follow up 2. Finally, data was analyzed both individually and in group. In individual analysis, we used diagrams, visual analysis and calculating the effect size, while in group analysis, the analysis of variance with one between group factor (two group of therapies) and one within group factor (time of tests) was used. Result: The results indicated that metacognitive therapy was more effective than cognitivebehavioral therapy in reducing the metacognitive beliefs, fusion beliefs and internal stop signals. However, cognitive-behavioral therapy was more effective than metacognitive therapy in reducing the control/threat beliefs. Conclusion: Considering these results, it can be suggested that overall, metacognitive therapy is more appropriate for reducing the obsessive symptoms. However, definitive conclusion about the efficacy of these therapies requires more studies.
topic obsession
metacognitive therapy
cognitive-behavioral therapy
fusion belies
internal stop signal
url http://shenakht.muk.ac.ir/article-1-379-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehayetmehr comparativeefficacyofmetacognitivetherapyversuscognitivebehavioraltherapyonreducingthemetacognitivebeliefsfusionbeliefsstopsignalsandcontrolthreatbeliefsinpatientwithwashingobsession
AT samansadeghpour comparativeefficacyofmetacognitivetherapyversuscognitivebehavioraltherapyonreducingthemetacognitivebeliefsfusionbeliefsstopsignalsandcontrolthreatbeliefsinpatientwithwashingobsession
_version_ 1725335061935423488