Construction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays

Academic writing ability is an important goal that learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) try to attain. While ESL students’ academic writings have been widely explored, owing to few studies investigating appraisal resources in EFL students’ argumentati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alireza Jalilifar, Ali Hemmati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2013-11-01
Series:Issues in Language Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1363_46ce400f40e54f3f07121049e5d7d896.pdf
id doaj-b779523dae7a42a39963036fbb519b4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b779523dae7a42a39963036fbb519b4f2020-11-25T04:05:26ZengAllameh Tabataba'i University PressIssues in Language Teaching2322-37152476-61942013-11-012257841363Construction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative EssaysAlireza Jalilifar0Ali Hemmati1Associate Professor, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, IranPh.D. Candidate, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, IranAcademic writing ability is an important goal that learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) try to attain. While ESL students’ academic writings have been widely explored, owing to few studies investigating appraisal resources in EFL students’ argumentative writing, the gap still exists about EFL students’ academic writing. This study aimed to see how Kurdish-speaking learners of English employ appraisal resources in their writings. It further aimed to explore whether the appraisal framework can be utilized as an assessment scale for evaluating the students’ argumentative writing. To this end, the study investigated the argumentative essays written by 15 bilingual Kurdish-Iranian graduates of English within the framework of the appraisal theory. The instruments applied in this study consisted of a modified rating scale for assessing the essays in terms of the macrostructures exploited in them and the framework for the analysis of appraisal resources. Quantitative findings revealed high-graded essays employ more attitudinal items and fewer monoglossic resources than low-graded ones. Qualitatively, the high-graded essays articulated attitudinal values in nominal forms and sometimes in a backgrounded manner while these values were mostly presented by surge of feelings and in a foregrounded way in the low-graded essays. Regarding engagement, unlike the high-graded essays, the low-graded ones were poor in recognizing other voices and alternative positions. Inspired by the strength of the appraisal model evaluating writing, results suggest that high-graded essays are successful in positioning readers attitudinally and clarifying the ethical message to readers.https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1363_46ce400f40e54f3f07121049e5d7d896.pdfargumentative writingappraisal theoryhigh- and low-graded essayskurdish
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alireza Jalilifar
Ali Hemmati
spellingShingle Alireza Jalilifar
Ali Hemmati
Construction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays
Issues in Language Teaching
argumentative writing
appraisal theory
high- and low-graded essays
kurdish
author_facet Alireza Jalilifar
Ali Hemmati
author_sort Alireza Jalilifar
title Construction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays
title_short Construction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays
title_full Construction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays
title_fullStr Construction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays
title_full_unstemmed Construction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays
title_sort construction of evaluative meanings by kurdish-speaking learners of english: a comparison of high- and low-graded argumentative essays
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
series Issues in Language Teaching
issn 2322-3715
2476-6194
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Academic writing ability is an important goal that learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) try to attain. While ESL students’ academic writings have been widely explored, owing to few studies investigating appraisal resources in EFL students’ argumentative writing, the gap still exists about EFL students’ academic writing. This study aimed to see how Kurdish-speaking learners of English employ appraisal resources in their writings. It further aimed to explore whether the appraisal framework can be utilized as an assessment scale for evaluating the students’ argumentative writing. To this end, the study investigated the argumentative essays written by 15 bilingual Kurdish-Iranian graduates of English within the framework of the appraisal theory. The instruments applied in this study consisted of a modified rating scale for assessing the essays in terms of the macrostructures exploited in them and the framework for the analysis of appraisal resources. Quantitative findings revealed high-graded essays employ more attitudinal items and fewer monoglossic resources than low-graded ones. Qualitatively, the high-graded essays articulated attitudinal values in nominal forms and sometimes in a backgrounded manner while these values were mostly presented by surge of feelings and in a foregrounded way in the low-graded essays. Regarding engagement, unlike the high-graded essays, the low-graded ones were poor in recognizing other voices and alternative positions. Inspired by the strength of the appraisal model evaluating writing, results suggest that high-graded essays are successful in positioning readers attitudinally and clarifying the ethical message to readers.
topic argumentative writing
appraisal theory
high- and low-graded essays
kurdish
url https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1363_46ce400f40e54f3f07121049e5d7d896.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezajalilifar constructionofevaluativemeaningsbykurdishspeakinglearnersofenglishacomparisonofhighandlowgradedargumentativeessays
AT alihemmati constructionofevaluativemeaningsbykurdishspeakinglearnersofenglishacomparisonofhighandlowgradedargumentativeessays
_version_ 1724433969583226880