Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
Objectives A core outcome set (COS) is an agreed standardised minimum collection of outcomes that should be measured and reported in research in a specific area of health. Cochrane systematic reviews (‘reviews’) are rigorous reviews on health-related topics conducted under the auspices of Cochrane....
Main Authors: | Karen Hughes, Mike Clarke, Sarah L Gorst, Paula R Williamson, Ricardo de Ávila Oliveira, Ian J Saldanha, Jochen Schmitt |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036562.full |
Similar Items
-
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
by: Kirkham Jamie J, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
by: Clarke Mike, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
by: Ingrid Eshun-Wilson, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability.
by: Ian J Saldanha, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
by: Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)