LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PARADIGM (construction of interethnic relations)

The paper presents some results of the research that is aimed at revealing the mechanisms of discursive construction of international and interethnic relations in different types of discourse. The object of study in this fragment is the legal discourse, which is viewed within the paradigm of social...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: T. V. Dubrovskaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kemerovo State University 2016-07-01
Series:Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
Subjects:
law
Online Access:https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/1977
id doaj-b7939888f4c042acbb607cd9c6b1a0ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7939888f4c042acbb607cd9c6b1a0ca2020-11-24T22:02:23ZengKemerovo State UniversityВестник Кемеровского государственного университета2078-89752078-89832016-07-010311712310.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-117-1231950LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PARADIGM (construction of interethnic relations)T. V. Dubrovskaya0Penza State UniversityThe paper presents some results of the research that is aimed at revealing the mechanisms of discursive construction of international and interethnic relations in different types of discourse. The object of study in this fragment is the legal discourse, which is viewed within the paradigm of social constructionism. The author consolidates studies of law as discursive practice and outlines an appropriate methodological perspective, which presupposes the interpretation of legal discourse in social and axiological context, participation of society in legal-discursive practices, and the essential role of legal discourse in power relations. To perform the analysis of the ‘Strategy of State national policy of the Russian Federation’, the author applies the categories of social actor, implicature, specifying and vagueness, which are typically exploited in Critical Discourse Analysis. The results demonstrate that the document in question categorises the participants in interethnic relations and constructs a few pairs of interacting parties. The state is represented as a key actor in interethnic relations. The document also operates the discursively opposite mechanisms of specifying and vagueness to problematise certain aspects of the relations. Axiologically laden abstract categories and implicature also construct interethnic relations.https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/1977legal discourselawsocial constructionisminterethnic relationsrepresentationsactors.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. V. Dubrovskaya
spellingShingle T. V. Dubrovskaya
LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PARADIGM (construction of interethnic relations)
Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
legal discourse
law
social constructionism
interethnic relations
representations
actors.
author_facet T. V. Dubrovskaya
author_sort T. V. Dubrovskaya
title LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PARADIGM (construction of interethnic relations)
title_short LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PARADIGM (construction of interethnic relations)
title_full LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PARADIGM (construction of interethnic relations)
title_fullStr LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PARADIGM (construction of interethnic relations)
title_full_unstemmed LEGAL DISCOURSE IN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PARADIGM (construction of interethnic relations)
title_sort legal discourse in the social constructionist paradigm (construction of interethnic relations)
publisher Kemerovo State University
series Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
issn 2078-8975
2078-8983
publishDate 2016-07-01
description The paper presents some results of the research that is aimed at revealing the mechanisms of discursive construction of international and interethnic relations in different types of discourse. The object of study in this fragment is the legal discourse, which is viewed within the paradigm of social constructionism. The author consolidates studies of law as discursive practice and outlines an appropriate methodological perspective, which presupposes the interpretation of legal discourse in social and axiological context, participation of society in legal-discursive practices, and the essential role of legal discourse in power relations. To perform the analysis of the ‘Strategy of State national policy of the Russian Federation’, the author applies the categories of social actor, implicature, specifying and vagueness, which are typically exploited in Critical Discourse Analysis. The results demonstrate that the document in question categorises the participants in interethnic relations and constructs a few pairs of interacting parties. The state is represented as a key actor in interethnic relations. The document also operates the discursively opposite mechanisms of specifying and vagueness to problematise certain aspects of the relations. Axiologically laden abstract categories and implicature also construct interethnic relations.
topic legal discourse
law
social constructionism
interethnic relations
representations
actors.
url https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/1977
work_keys_str_mv AT tvdubrovskaya legaldiscourseinthesocialconstructionistparadigmconstructionofinterethnicrelations
_version_ 1725836067473457152