Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions
Abstract Background Sustainable shifts in population behaviours require system-level implementation and embeddedness of large-scale health interventions. This paper aims to understand how different contexts of scaling up interventions affect mechanisms to produce intended and unintended scale up out...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01103-0 |
id |
doaj-b7c717ec04a243deb93b1ec76e8a5fc0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b7c717ec04a243deb93b1ec76e8a5fc02021-03-28T11:25:06ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682021-03-0118111610.1186/s12966-021-01103-0Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventionsHarriet Koorts0Samuel Cassar1Jo Salmon2Mark Lawrence3Paul Salmon4Henry Dorling5Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition SciencesDeakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition SciencesDeakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition SciencesDeakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition SciencesCentre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, Faculty of Arts, Business and Law, University of the Sunshine CoastSolent University, School of Sport, Health and Social ScienceAbstract Background Sustainable shifts in population behaviours require system-level implementation and embeddedness of large-scale health interventions. This paper aims to understand how different contexts of scaling up interventions affect mechanisms to produce intended and unintended scale up outcomes. Methods A mixed method study combining a realist perspective and systems analysis (causal loop diagrams) of scaled-up physical activity and/or nutrition interventions implemented at a state/national level in Australia (2010–18). The study involved four distinct phases: Phase 1 expert consultation, database and grey literature searches to identify scaled-up interventions; Phase 2 generating initial Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOs) from the WHO ExpandNet framework for scaling up; Phase 3 testing and refining CMOs via online surveys and realist interviews with academics, government and non-government organisations (NGOs) involved in scale up of selected interventions (Phase 1); and Phase 4 generating cross-case mid-range theories represented in systems models of scaling up; validated by member checking. Descriptive statistics were reported for online survey data and realist analysis for interview data. Results Seven interventions were analysed, targeting nutrition (n = 1), physical activity (n = 1), or a combination (n = 5). Twenty-six participants completed surveys; 19 completed interviews. Sixty-three CMO pathways underpinned successful scale up, reflecting 36 scale up contexts, 8 key outcomes; linked via 53 commonly occurring mechanisms. All five WHO framework domains were represented in the systems models. Most CMO pathways included ‘intervention attributes’ and led to outcomes ‘community sustainability/embeddedness’ and ‘stakeholder buy-in/perceived value’. Irrespective of interventions being scaled in similar contexts (e.g., having political favourability); mechanisms still led to both intended and unintended scale up outcomes (e.g., increased or reduced sustainability). Conclusion This paper provides the first evidence for mechanisms underpinning outcomes required for successful scale up of state or nationally delivered interventions. Our findings challenge current prerequisites for effective scaling suggesting other conditions may be necessary. Future scale up approaches that plan for complexity and encourage iterative adaptation throughout, may enhance scale up outcomes. Current linear, context-to-outcome depictions of scale up oversimplify what is a clearly a complex interaction between perceptions, worldviews and goals of those involved. Mechanisms identified in this study could potentially be leveraged during future scale up efforts, to positively influence intervention scalability and sustainability.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01103-0Scale upSystemsPhysical activityNutritionInterventionRealist evaluation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Harriet Koorts Samuel Cassar Jo Salmon Mark Lawrence Paul Salmon Henry Dorling |
spellingShingle |
Harriet Koorts Samuel Cassar Jo Salmon Mark Lawrence Paul Salmon Henry Dorling Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Scale up Systems Physical activity Nutrition Intervention Realist evaluation |
author_facet |
Harriet Koorts Samuel Cassar Jo Salmon Mark Lawrence Paul Salmon Henry Dorling |
author_sort |
Harriet Koorts |
title |
Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions |
title_short |
Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions |
title_full |
Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions |
title_fullStr |
Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions |
title_sort |
mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity |
issn |
1479-5868 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Sustainable shifts in population behaviours require system-level implementation and embeddedness of large-scale health interventions. This paper aims to understand how different contexts of scaling up interventions affect mechanisms to produce intended and unintended scale up outcomes. Methods A mixed method study combining a realist perspective and systems analysis (causal loop diagrams) of scaled-up physical activity and/or nutrition interventions implemented at a state/national level in Australia (2010–18). The study involved four distinct phases: Phase 1 expert consultation, database and grey literature searches to identify scaled-up interventions; Phase 2 generating initial Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOs) from the WHO ExpandNet framework for scaling up; Phase 3 testing and refining CMOs via online surveys and realist interviews with academics, government and non-government organisations (NGOs) involved in scale up of selected interventions (Phase 1); and Phase 4 generating cross-case mid-range theories represented in systems models of scaling up; validated by member checking. Descriptive statistics were reported for online survey data and realist analysis for interview data. Results Seven interventions were analysed, targeting nutrition (n = 1), physical activity (n = 1), or a combination (n = 5). Twenty-six participants completed surveys; 19 completed interviews. Sixty-three CMO pathways underpinned successful scale up, reflecting 36 scale up contexts, 8 key outcomes; linked via 53 commonly occurring mechanisms. All five WHO framework domains were represented in the systems models. Most CMO pathways included ‘intervention attributes’ and led to outcomes ‘community sustainability/embeddedness’ and ‘stakeholder buy-in/perceived value’. Irrespective of interventions being scaled in similar contexts (e.g., having political favourability); mechanisms still led to both intended and unintended scale up outcomes (e.g., increased or reduced sustainability). Conclusion This paper provides the first evidence for mechanisms underpinning outcomes required for successful scale up of state or nationally delivered interventions. Our findings challenge current prerequisites for effective scaling suggesting other conditions may be necessary. Future scale up approaches that plan for complexity and encourage iterative adaptation throughout, may enhance scale up outcomes. Current linear, context-to-outcome depictions of scale up oversimplify what is a clearly a complex interaction between perceptions, worldviews and goals of those involved. Mechanisms identified in this study could potentially be leveraged during future scale up efforts, to positively influence intervention scalability and sustainability. |
topic |
Scale up Systems Physical activity Nutrition Intervention Realist evaluation |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01103-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT harrietkoorts mechanismsofscalingupcombiningarealistperspectiveandsystemsanalysistounderstandsuccessfullyscaledinterventions AT samuelcassar mechanismsofscalingupcombiningarealistperspectiveandsystemsanalysistounderstandsuccessfullyscaledinterventions AT josalmon mechanismsofscalingupcombiningarealistperspectiveandsystemsanalysistounderstandsuccessfullyscaledinterventions AT marklawrence mechanismsofscalingupcombiningarealistperspectiveandsystemsanalysistounderstandsuccessfullyscaledinterventions AT paulsalmon mechanismsofscalingupcombiningarealistperspectiveandsystemsanalysistounderstandsuccessfullyscaledinterventions AT henrydorling mechanismsofscalingupcombiningarealistperspectiveandsystemsanalysistounderstandsuccessfullyscaledinterventions |
_version_ |
1724200159842140160 |