From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical Theory

Berber Bevernage does not share the pessimistic view that the philosophy of history is in crisis or coming to an end: it can have a bright and fascinating future. However in order to remain relevant, he argues, philosophy of history should look beyond academic historiography and transform into a br...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Berber Bevernage
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2012-12-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/5907
id doaj-b8123dd23e494b248f62e37e0c6be05f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8123dd23e494b248f62e37e0c6be05f2021-10-02T15:44:26ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982012-12-011274From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical TheoryBerber Bevernage0Royal Netherlands Historical Society (reviews) Berber Bevernage does not share the pessimistic view that the philosophy of history is in crisis or coming to an end: it can have a bright and fascinating future. However in order to remain relevant, he argues, philosophy of history should look beyond academic historiography and transform into a broad ‘philosophy of historicities’ that also pays attention to the wide variety of extra-academic ways of dealing with the past. In order to do this current philosophy of history has to overcome a number challenges.   First, it has to recognise that academic historiography did not develop in an intellectual vacuum but is closely related to particular social, cultural and political presuppositions about time and historicity on which it is partly dependent but which it can also reinforce or contradict. Second, it should recognise that different approaches to time and historicity have different social, cultural and political functions and not restrict its focus to philosophy of science or epistemological/cognitive issues. Third, it should focus on the ethics of history.   This article is part of the forum 'Theoretical History'. https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/5907Theoretical HistoryHistory of IdeasUniversitiesStudentsPhilosophy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Berber Bevernage
spellingShingle Berber Bevernage
From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical Theory
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Theoretical History
History of Ideas
Universities
Students
Philosophy
author_facet Berber Bevernage
author_sort Berber Bevernage
title From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical Theory
title_short From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical Theory
title_full From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical Theory
title_fullStr From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical Theory
title_full_unstemmed From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical Theory
title_sort from philosophy of history to philosophy of historicities: some ideas on a potential future of historical theory
publisher Open Journals
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
publishDate 2012-12-01
description Berber Bevernage does not share the pessimistic view that the philosophy of history is in crisis or coming to an end: it can have a bright and fascinating future. However in order to remain relevant, he argues, philosophy of history should look beyond academic historiography and transform into a broad ‘philosophy of historicities’ that also pays attention to the wide variety of extra-academic ways of dealing with the past. In order to do this current philosophy of history has to overcome a number challenges.   First, it has to recognise that academic historiography did not develop in an intellectual vacuum but is closely related to particular social, cultural and political presuppositions about time and historicity on which it is partly dependent but which it can also reinforce or contradict. Second, it should recognise that different approaches to time and historicity have different social, cultural and political functions and not restrict its focus to philosophy of science or epistemological/cognitive issues. Third, it should focus on the ethics of history.   This article is part of the forum 'Theoretical History'.
topic Theoretical History
History of Ideas
Universities
Students
Philosophy
url https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/5907
work_keys_str_mv AT berberbevernage fromphilosophyofhistorytophilosophyofhistoricitiessomeideasonapotentialfutureofhistoricaltheory
_version_ 1716853282533539840