Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials
One important feature of two dimensional (2D) materials is that they possess an exceptional nonlinear optical (NLO) response to light, with conduc¬tivities that are several orders of magnitude larger than their 3D counterparts. The theoretical descriptions of these NLO responses in crystalline syste...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2020-01-01
|
Series: | EPJ Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2020/09/epjconf_cmpnc2019_03001.pdf |
id |
doaj-b817d3bbe55346bebf337fbbb3834275 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b817d3bbe55346bebf337fbbb38342752021-08-02T13:47:35ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2020-01-012330300110.1051/epjconf/202023303001epjconf_cmpnc2019_03001Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materialsVentura G.B.0Passos D.J.1Viana Parente Lopes J.M.2Lopes dos Santos J.M.B.3Centro de Física das Universidades do Minho e Porto, Universidade do PortoCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e Porto, Universidade do PortoCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e Porto, Universidade do PortoCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e Porto, Universidade do PortoOne important feature of two dimensional (2D) materials is that they possess an exceptional nonlinear optical (NLO) response to light, with conduc¬tivities that are several orders of magnitude larger than their 3D counterparts. The theoretical descriptions of these NLO responses in crystalline systems in¬volve two different representations of the perturbation: the length and velocity gauges. The former has been the formalism of choice for the past two decades; the latter was implemented only recently, due to concerns that it could not be pratically implemented without breaking sum rules – a set of identities that en¬sure the equivalence between the two formalisms – which would then render the results unphysical. In this work, we shall review and summarize our contri¬butions to the study of the two formalisms and of their relationship by means of the aforementioned sum rules.https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2020/09/epjconf_cmpnc2019_03001.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ventura G.B. Passos D.J. Viana Parente Lopes J.M. Lopes dos Santos J.M.B. |
spellingShingle |
Ventura G.B. Passos D.J. Viana Parente Lopes J.M. Lopes dos Santos J.M.B. Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials EPJ Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Ventura G.B. Passos D.J. Viana Parente Lopes J.M. Lopes dos Santos J.M.B. |
author_sort |
Ventura G.B. |
title |
Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials |
title_short |
Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials |
title_full |
Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials |
title_fullStr |
Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials |
title_sort |
theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2d materials |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
EPJ Web of Conferences |
issn |
2100-014X |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
One important feature of two dimensional (2D) materials is that they possess an exceptional nonlinear optical (NLO) response to light, with conduc¬tivities that are several orders of magnitude larger than their 3D counterparts. The theoretical descriptions of these NLO responses in crystalline systems in¬volve two different representations of the perturbation: the length and velocity gauges. The former has been the formalism of choice for the past two decades; the latter was implemented only recently, due to concerns that it could not be pratically implemented without breaking sum rules – a set of identities that en¬sure the equivalence between the two formalisms – which would then render the results unphysical. In this work, we shall review and summarize our contri¬butions to the study of the two formalisms and of their relationship by means of the aforementioned sum rules. |
url |
https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2020/09/epjconf_cmpnc2019_03001.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT venturagb theoreticalcalculationsofnonlinearopticalcalculationsof2dmaterials AT passosdj theoreticalcalculationsofnonlinearopticalcalculationsof2dmaterials AT vianaparentelopesjm theoreticalcalculationsofnonlinearopticalcalculationsof2dmaterials AT lopesdossantosjmb theoreticalcalculationsofnonlinearopticalcalculationsof2dmaterials |
_version_ |
1721231774208491520 |