Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials

One important feature of two dimensional (2D) materials is that they possess an exceptional nonlinear optical (NLO) response to light, with conduc¬tivities that are several orders of magnitude larger than their 3D counterparts. The theoretical descriptions of these NLO responses in crystalline syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ventura G.B., Passos D.J., Viana Parente Lopes J.M., Lopes dos Santos J.M.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2020/09/epjconf_cmpnc2019_03001.pdf
id doaj-b817d3bbe55346bebf337fbbb3834275
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b817d3bbe55346bebf337fbbb38342752021-08-02T13:47:35ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2020-01-012330300110.1051/epjconf/202023303001epjconf_cmpnc2019_03001Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materialsVentura G.B.0Passos D.J.1Viana Parente Lopes J.M.2Lopes dos Santos J.M.B.3Centro de Física das Universidades do Minho e Porto, Universidade do PortoCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e Porto, Universidade do PortoCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e Porto, Universidade do PortoCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e Porto, Universidade do PortoOne important feature of two dimensional (2D) materials is that they possess an exceptional nonlinear optical (NLO) response to light, with conduc¬tivities that are several orders of magnitude larger than their 3D counterparts. The theoretical descriptions of these NLO responses in crystalline systems in¬volve two different representations of the perturbation: the length and velocity gauges. The former has been the formalism of choice for the past two decades; the latter was implemented only recently, due to concerns that it could not be pratically implemented without breaking sum rules – a set of identities that en¬sure the equivalence between the two formalisms – which would then render the results unphysical. In this work, we shall review and summarize our contri¬butions to the study of the two formalisms and of their relationship by means of the aforementioned sum rules.https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2020/09/epjconf_cmpnc2019_03001.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ventura G.B.
Passos D.J.
Viana Parente Lopes J.M.
Lopes dos Santos J.M.B.
spellingShingle Ventura G.B.
Passos D.J.
Viana Parente Lopes J.M.
Lopes dos Santos J.M.B.
Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet Ventura G.B.
Passos D.J.
Viana Parente Lopes J.M.
Lopes dos Santos J.M.B.
author_sort Ventura G.B.
title Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials
title_short Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials
title_full Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials
title_fullStr Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2D materials
title_sort theoretical calculations of nonlinear optical calculations of 2d materials
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description One important feature of two dimensional (2D) materials is that they possess an exceptional nonlinear optical (NLO) response to light, with conduc¬tivities that are several orders of magnitude larger than their 3D counterparts. The theoretical descriptions of these NLO responses in crystalline systems in¬volve two different representations of the perturbation: the length and velocity gauges. The former has been the formalism of choice for the past two decades; the latter was implemented only recently, due to concerns that it could not be pratically implemented without breaking sum rules – a set of identities that en¬sure the equivalence between the two formalisms – which would then render the results unphysical. In this work, we shall review and summarize our contri¬butions to the study of the two formalisms and of their relationship by means of the aforementioned sum rules.
url https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2020/09/epjconf_cmpnc2019_03001.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT venturagb theoreticalcalculationsofnonlinearopticalcalculationsof2dmaterials
AT passosdj theoreticalcalculationsofnonlinearopticalcalculationsof2dmaterials
AT vianaparentelopesjm theoreticalcalculationsofnonlinearopticalcalculationsof2dmaterials
AT lopesdossantosjmb theoreticalcalculationsofnonlinearopticalcalculationsof2dmaterials
_version_ 1721231774208491520