Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform Lidar

Species information is a key component of any forest inventory. However, when performing forest inventory from aerial scanning Lidar data, species classification can be very difficult. We investigated changes in classification accuracy while identifying five individual tree species (Douglas-fir, wes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric C. Turnblom, L. Monika Moskal, Nicholas R. Vaughn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-02-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/4/2/377/
id doaj-b82362b517d7451f8c24b555f3543b88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b82362b517d7451f8c24b555f3543b882020-11-25T00:02:31ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922012-02-014237740310.3390/rs4020377Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform LidarEric C. TurnblomL. Monika MoskalNicholas R. VaughnSpecies information is a key component of any forest inventory. However, when performing forest inventory from aerial scanning Lidar data, species classification can be very difficult. We investigated changes in classification accuracy while identifying five individual tree species (Douglas-fir, western redcedar, bigleaf maple, red alder, and black cottonwood) in the Pacific Northwest United States using two data sets: discrete point Lidar data alone and discrete point data in combination with waveform Lidar data. Waveform information included variables which summarize the frequency domain representation of all waveforms crossing individual trees. Discrete point data alone provided 79.2 percent overall accuracy (kappa = 0.74) for all 5 species and up to 97.8 percent (kappa = 0.96) when comparing individual pairs of these 5 species. Incorporating waveform information improved the overall accuracy to 85.4 percent (kappa = 0.817) for five species, and in several two-species comparisons. Improvements were most notable in comparing the two conifer species and in comparing two of the three hardwood species.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/4/2/377/Support Vector Machinefullwave lidardiscrete Fourier transformforest inventory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eric C. Turnblom
L. Monika Moskal
Nicholas R. Vaughn
spellingShingle Eric C. Turnblom
L. Monika Moskal
Nicholas R. Vaughn
Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform Lidar
Remote Sensing
Support Vector Machine
fullwave lidar
discrete Fourier transform
forest inventory
author_facet Eric C. Turnblom
L. Monika Moskal
Nicholas R. Vaughn
author_sort Eric C. Turnblom
title Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform Lidar
title_short Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform Lidar
title_full Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform Lidar
title_fullStr Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform Lidar
title_full_unstemmed Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform Lidar
title_sort tree species detection accuracies using discrete point lidar and airborne waveform lidar
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2012-02-01
description Species information is a key component of any forest inventory. However, when performing forest inventory from aerial scanning Lidar data, species classification can be very difficult. We investigated changes in classification accuracy while identifying five individual tree species (Douglas-fir, western redcedar, bigleaf maple, red alder, and black cottonwood) in the Pacific Northwest United States using two data sets: discrete point Lidar data alone and discrete point data in combination with waveform Lidar data. Waveform information included variables which summarize the frequency domain representation of all waveforms crossing individual trees. Discrete point data alone provided 79.2 percent overall accuracy (kappa = 0.74) for all 5 species and up to 97.8 percent (kappa = 0.96) when comparing individual pairs of these 5 species. Incorporating waveform information improved the overall accuracy to 85.4 percent (kappa = 0.817) for five species, and in several two-species comparisons. Improvements were most notable in comparing the two conifer species and in comparing two of the three hardwood species.
topic Support Vector Machine
fullwave lidar
discrete Fourier transform
forest inventory
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/4/2/377/
work_keys_str_mv AT ericcturnblom treespeciesdetectionaccuraciesusingdiscretepointlidarandairbornewaveformlidar
AT lmonikamoskal treespeciesdetectionaccuraciesusingdiscretepointlidarandairbornewaveformlidar
AT nicholasrvaughn treespeciesdetectionaccuraciesusingdiscretepointlidarandairbornewaveformlidar
_version_ 1725437345465892864