Retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse

Introduction: Reduced port laparoscopic Well's procedure (RPLWP) is a novel technique used to overcome the limitations of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between RPLWP and conventional laparoscopic Well's procedure (CLWP) and to investiga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akira Umemura, Takayuki Suto, Hisataka Fujiwara, Seika Nakamura, Fumitaka Endo, Akira Sasaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2019;volume=15;issue=4;spage=316;epage=319;aulast=Umemura
id doaj-b837931e5b2e4c34a1977ff1233861b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b837931e5b2e4c34a1977ff1233861b52020-11-25T02:39:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212019-01-0115431631910.4103/jmas.JMAS_100_18Retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapseAkira UmemuraTakayuki SutoHisataka FujiwaraSeika NakamuraFumitaka EndoAkira SasakiIntroduction: Reduced port laparoscopic Well's procedure (RPLWP) is a novel technique used to overcome the limitations of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between RPLWP and conventional laparoscopic Well's procedure (CLWP) and to investigate the learning curve of RPLWP. Patients and Methods: From January 2006 to March 2017, a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained laparoscopic surgery database was performed to identify patients had undergone CLWP and RPLWP. From these patients, each of 10 cases were manually matched for age, sex, body mass index. From January 2006 to March 2015, CLWP was used for all procedures whereas, from April 2015, RPLWP was routinely performed as a standard procedure for rectal prolapse. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operating time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, and conversion to CLWP or open rectopexy. Based on the postoperative outcomes, the hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RPLWP group. The estimated learning curve for RPLWP was fitted and defined as y = 278.47e-0.064x with R2 = 0.838; therefore, a significant decrease in operative time was observed by using the more advanced surgical procedure. Conclusions: RPLWP is an effective, safe, minimally invasive procedural alternative to CLWP with no disadvantage for patients when a skilled surgeon performs it.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2019;volume=15;issue=4;spage=316;epage=319;aulast=UmemuraRectopexyreduced port surgerysingle-incision laparoscopic surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Akira Umemura
Takayuki Suto
Hisataka Fujiwara
Seika Nakamura
Fumitaka Endo
Akira Sasaki
spellingShingle Akira Umemura
Takayuki Suto
Hisataka Fujiwara
Seika Nakamura
Fumitaka Endo
Akira Sasaki
Retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Rectopexy
reduced port surgery
single-incision laparoscopic surgery
author_facet Akira Umemura
Takayuki Suto
Hisataka Fujiwara
Seika Nakamura
Fumitaka Endo
Akira Sasaki
author_sort Akira Umemura
title Retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse
title_short Retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse
title_full Retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse
title_fullStr Retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse
title_sort retrospective case-matched study between reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy and conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Introduction: Reduced port laparoscopic Well's procedure (RPLWP) is a novel technique used to overcome the limitations of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between RPLWP and conventional laparoscopic Well's procedure (CLWP) and to investigate the learning curve of RPLWP. Patients and Methods: From January 2006 to March 2017, a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained laparoscopic surgery database was performed to identify patients had undergone CLWP and RPLWP. From these patients, each of 10 cases were manually matched for age, sex, body mass index. From January 2006 to March 2015, CLWP was used for all procedures whereas, from April 2015, RPLWP was routinely performed as a standard procedure for rectal prolapse. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operating time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, and conversion to CLWP or open rectopexy. Based on the postoperative outcomes, the hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RPLWP group. The estimated learning curve for RPLWP was fitted and defined as y = 278.47e-0.064x with R2 = 0.838; therefore, a significant decrease in operative time was observed by using the more advanced surgical procedure. Conclusions: RPLWP is an effective, safe, minimally invasive procedural alternative to CLWP with no disadvantage for patients when a skilled surgeon performs it.
topic Rectopexy
reduced port surgery
single-incision laparoscopic surgery
url http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2019;volume=15;issue=4;spage=316;epage=319;aulast=Umemura
work_keys_str_mv AT akiraumemura retrospectivecasematchedstudybetweenreducedportlaparoscopicrectopexyandconventionallaparoscopicrectopexyforrectalprolapse
AT takayukisuto retrospectivecasematchedstudybetweenreducedportlaparoscopicrectopexyandconventionallaparoscopicrectopexyforrectalprolapse
AT hisatakafujiwara retrospectivecasematchedstudybetweenreducedportlaparoscopicrectopexyandconventionallaparoscopicrectopexyforrectalprolapse
AT seikanakamura retrospectivecasematchedstudybetweenreducedportlaparoscopicrectopexyandconventionallaparoscopicrectopexyforrectalprolapse
AT fumitakaendo retrospectivecasematchedstudybetweenreducedportlaparoscopicrectopexyandconventionallaparoscopicrectopexyforrectalprolapse
AT akirasasaki retrospectivecasematchedstudybetweenreducedportlaparoscopicrectopexyandconventionallaparoscopicrectopexyforrectalprolapse
_version_ 1724785369139904512