Borderwaters: Archipelagic Geometries between Indonesia and the United States

<span lang="en-us" xml:lang="en-us">Generally speaking, the border/borderlands complex has oriented itself around interactions between the border as a one-dimensional Euclidean line and the borderlands’ set of contestations growing out of cultural currents that exceed the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brian Russell Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Transnational American Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7010021b
id doaj-b85393695a81453ab1e0ece8fdf5c39e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b85393695a81453ab1e0ece8fdf5c39e2020-12-15T08:16:49ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaJournal of Transnational American Studies1940-07642020-07-01111ark:13030/qt7010021bBorderwaters: Archipelagic Geometries between Indonesia and the United StatesBrian Russell Roberts0Brigham Young University<span lang="en-us" xml:lang="en-us">Generally speaking, the border/borderlands complex has oriented itself around interactions between the border as a one-dimensional Euclidean line and the borderlands’ set of contestations growing out of cultural currents that exceed the state’s superimposed Euclidean geometry/geography. In complement and contradistinction, this essay advances a borderwaters framework as interlinked with governmentality’s engagement in and with modes of <em>non</em>-Euclidean spatial perception, in which the state’s imagination of borders has not been the evocation of, in Gloria Anzaldúa’s term, an “unnatural boundary” but has rather been a partial function of the geological and hydrological materialities and processes to which governmentality has tended to affix water-based and water-dependent borders. These water-dependent and natural-cultural borders (with their attendant notions of human sovereignty) are intertwined with an arena of borderwaters where nonhuman actants (currents, waves, shorelines, and nonhuman animals) play roles in establishing how human borders will attain perception. In outlining some of the dynamics of the borderwaters, this essay turns toward the oceanic and archipelagic work of the Greater Mexican visual artist Miguel Covarrubias, whose midcentury representations of Indonesia and the United States’s Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands help contextualize and theorize state, Indigenous, and nonhuman cultures as they have converged and diverged across non-Euclidean modes of imagining boundaries, nonboundaries, and spatial area on a terraqueous planet.</span>http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7010021bborderwatersnonhuman agencynon-euclidean geometrymiguel covarrubiastransnational american studiesjtas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brian Russell Roberts
spellingShingle Brian Russell Roberts
Borderwaters: Archipelagic Geometries between Indonesia and the United States
Journal of Transnational American Studies
borderwaters
nonhuman agency
non-euclidean geometry
miguel covarrubias
transnational american studies
jtas
author_facet Brian Russell Roberts
author_sort Brian Russell Roberts
title Borderwaters: Archipelagic Geometries between Indonesia and the United States
title_short Borderwaters: Archipelagic Geometries between Indonesia and the United States
title_full Borderwaters: Archipelagic Geometries between Indonesia and the United States
title_fullStr Borderwaters: Archipelagic Geometries between Indonesia and the United States
title_full_unstemmed Borderwaters: Archipelagic Geometries between Indonesia and the United States
title_sort borderwaters: archipelagic geometries between indonesia and the united states
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series Journal of Transnational American Studies
issn 1940-0764
publishDate 2020-07-01
description <span lang="en-us" xml:lang="en-us">Generally speaking, the border/borderlands complex has oriented itself around interactions between the border as a one-dimensional Euclidean line and the borderlands’ set of contestations growing out of cultural currents that exceed the state’s superimposed Euclidean geometry/geography. In complement and contradistinction, this essay advances a borderwaters framework as interlinked with governmentality’s engagement in and with modes of <em>non</em>-Euclidean spatial perception, in which the state’s imagination of borders has not been the evocation of, in Gloria Anzaldúa’s term, an “unnatural boundary” but has rather been a partial function of the geological and hydrological materialities and processes to which governmentality has tended to affix water-based and water-dependent borders. These water-dependent and natural-cultural borders (with their attendant notions of human sovereignty) are intertwined with an arena of borderwaters where nonhuman actants (currents, waves, shorelines, and nonhuman animals) play roles in establishing how human borders will attain perception. In outlining some of the dynamics of the borderwaters, this essay turns toward the oceanic and archipelagic work of the Greater Mexican visual artist Miguel Covarrubias, whose midcentury representations of Indonesia and the United States’s Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands help contextualize and theorize state, Indigenous, and nonhuman cultures as they have converged and diverged across non-Euclidean modes of imagining boundaries, nonboundaries, and spatial area on a terraqueous planet.</span>
topic borderwaters
nonhuman agency
non-euclidean geometry
miguel covarrubias
transnational american studies
jtas
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7010021b
work_keys_str_mv AT brianrussellroberts borderwatersarchipelagicgeometriesbetweenindonesiaandtheunitedstates
_version_ 1724382574962278400