Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Walking disability is one of the most frequent and burdening symptoms of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Most of the exercise intervention studies that showed an improvement in mobility performance were conducted in low to moderately disabled relapsing–remitting MS patients with int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Inga Heinrich, Friederike Rosenthal, Stefan Patra, Karl-Heinz Schulz, Götz H. Welsch, Eik Vettorazzi, Sina C. Rosenkranz, Jan Patrick Stellmann, Caren Ramien, Jana Pöttgen, Stefan M. Gold, Christoph Heesen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.644533/full
id doaj-b858b692f7984a41941205620a3e4949
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Inga Heinrich
Friederike Rosenthal
Stefan Patra
Karl-Heinz Schulz
Götz H. Welsch
Eik Vettorazzi
Sina C. Rosenkranz
Sina C. Rosenkranz
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Caren Ramien
Jana Pöttgen
Jana Pöttgen
Stefan M. Gold
Stefan M. Gold
Stefan M. Gold
Christoph Heesen
Christoph Heesen
spellingShingle Inga Heinrich
Friederike Rosenthal
Stefan Patra
Karl-Heinz Schulz
Götz H. Welsch
Eik Vettorazzi
Sina C. Rosenkranz
Sina C. Rosenkranz
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Caren Ramien
Jana Pöttgen
Jana Pöttgen
Stefan M. Gold
Stefan M. Gold
Stefan M. Gold
Christoph Heesen
Christoph Heesen
Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Frontiers in Neurology
aerobic exercise
multiple sclerosis
progressive multiple sclerosis
arm ergometry
cognition
author_facet Inga Heinrich
Friederike Rosenthal
Stefan Patra
Karl-Heinz Schulz
Götz H. Welsch
Eik Vettorazzi
Sina C. Rosenkranz
Sina C. Rosenkranz
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Jan Patrick Stellmann
Caren Ramien
Jana Pöttgen
Jana Pöttgen
Stefan M. Gold
Stefan M. Gold
Stefan M. Gold
Christoph Heesen
Christoph Heesen
author_sort Inga Heinrich
title Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort arm ergometry to improve mobility in progressive multiple sclerosis (ambos)—results of a pilot randomized controlled trial
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Background: Walking disability is one of the most frequent and burdening symptoms of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Most of the exercise intervention studies that showed an improvement in mobility performance were conducted in low to moderately disabled relapsing–remitting MS patients with interventions using the legs. However, MS patients with substantial walking disability hardly can perform these tasks. Earlier work has indicated that aerobic arm training might also improve walking performance and could therefore be a therapeutic option in already moderately disabled progressive MS patients.Methods: Patients with progressive MS and EDSS 4–6.5 were randomized using a computer-generated algorithm list to either a waitlist control group (CG) or an intervention group (IG). The IG performed a 12-week home-based, individualized arm ergometry exercise training program. Maximum walking distance as measured by the 6-min walking test (6MWT) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included aerobic fitness, other mobility tests, cognitive functioning, as well as fatigue and depression.Results: Of n = 86 screened patients, 53 with moderate disability (mean EDSS 5.5, SD 0.9) were included and data of 39 patients were analyzed. Patients in the IG showed strong adherence to the program with a mean of 67 (SD 26.4) training sessions. Maximum work load (Pmax) increased in the training group while other fitness indicators did not. Walking distance in the 6MWT improved in both training and waitlist group but not significantly more in trained patients. Similarly, other mobility measures showed no differential group effect. Cognitive functioning remained unchanged. No serious events attributable to the intervention occurred.Conclusion: Although maximum work load improved, 3 months of high-frequency arm ergometry training of low to moderate intensity could not show improved walking ability or cognitive functioning in progressive MS compared to a waitlist CG.The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03147105) and funded by the local MS self-help organization.
topic aerobic exercise
multiple sclerosis
progressive multiple sclerosis
arm ergometry
cognition
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.644533/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ingaheinrich armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT friederikerosenthal armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stefanpatra armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT karlheinzschulz armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gotzhwelsch armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eikvettorazzi armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sinacrosenkranz armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sinacrosenkranz armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT janpatrickstellmann armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT janpatrickstellmann armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT janpatrickstellmann armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT carenramien armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT janapottgen armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT janapottgen armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stefanmgold armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stefanmgold armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stefanmgold armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT christophheesen armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT christophheesen armergometrytoimprovemobilityinprogressivemultiplesclerosisambosresultsofapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721295139353133056
spelling doaj-b858b692f7984a41941205620a3e49492021-07-19T10:02:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-07-011210.3389/fneur.2021.644533644533Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled TrialInga Heinrich0Friederike Rosenthal1Stefan Patra2Karl-Heinz Schulz3Götz H. Welsch4Eik Vettorazzi5Sina C. Rosenkranz6Sina C. Rosenkranz7Jan Patrick Stellmann8Jan Patrick Stellmann9Jan Patrick Stellmann10Caren Ramien11Jana Pöttgen12Jana Pöttgen13Stefan M. Gold14Stefan M. Gold15Stefan M. Gold16Christoph Heesen17Christoph Heesen18Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyUniversitäres Kompetenzzentrum für Sport- und Bewegungsmedizin (Athleticum) und Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyUniversitäres Kompetenzzentrum für Sport- und Bewegungsmedizin (Athleticum) und Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyUniversitäres Kompetenzzentrum für Sport- und Bewegungsmedizin (Athleticum) und Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Biometry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyAPHM, Hospital de la Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, FranceAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, UMR 7339, Marseille, FranceInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, GermanyDivision of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Medical Department, Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyBackground: Walking disability is one of the most frequent and burdening symptoms of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Most of the exercise intervention studies that showed an improvement in mobility performance were conducted in low to moderately disabled relapsing–remitting MS patients with interventions using the legs. However, MS patients with substantial walking disability hardly can perform these tasks. Earlier work has indicated that aerobic arm training might also improve walking performance and could therefore be a therapeutic option in already moderately disabled progressive MS patients.Methods: Patients with progressive MS and EDSS 4–6.5 were randomized using a computer-generated algorithm list to either a waitlist control group (CG) or an intervention group (IG). The IG performed a 12-week home-based, individualized arm ergometry exercise training program. Maximum walking distance as measured by the 6-min walking test (6MWT) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included aerobic fitness, other mobility tests, cognitive functioning, as well as fatigue and depression.Results: Of n = 86 screened patients, 53 with moderate disability (mean EDSS 5.5, SD 0.9) were included and data of 39 patients were analyzed. Patients in the IG showed strong adherence to the program with a mean of 67 (SD 26.4) training sessions. Maximum work load (Pmax) increased in the training group while other fitness indicators did not. Walking distance in the 6MWT improved in both training and waitlist group but not significantly more in trained patients. Similarly, other mobility measures showed no differential group effect. Cognitive functioning remained unchanged. No serious events attributable to the intervention occurred.Conclusion: Although maximum work load improved, 3 months of high-frequency arm ergometry training of low to moderate intensity could not show improved walking ability or cognitive functioning in progressive MS compared to a waitlist CG.The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03147105) and funded by the local MS self-help organization.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.644533/fullaerobic exercisemultiple sclerosisprogressive multiple sclerosisarm ergometrycognition