Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sexual dimorphism of body size has been the subject of numerous studies, but few have examined sexual shape dimorphism (SShD) and its evolution. Allometry, the shape change associated with size variation, has been suggested to be a m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baylac Michel, Gidaszewski Nelly A, Klingenberg Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-05-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/9/110
id doaj-b87fc3b061cd41aebfb3246c91684b41
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b87fc3b061cd41aebfb3246c91684b412021-09-02T04:44:34ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482009-05-019111010.1186/1471-2148-9-110Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroupBaylac MichelGidaszewski Nelly AKlingenberg Christian<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sexual dimorphism of body size has been the subject of numerous studies, but few have examined sexual shape dimorphism (SShD) and its evolution. Allometry, the shape change associated with size variation, has been suggested to be a main component of SShD. Yet little is known about the relative importance of the allometric and non-allometric components for the evolution of SShD.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We investigated sexual dimorphism in wing shape in the nine species of the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup. We used geometric morphometrics to characterise wing shape and found significant SShD in all nine species. The amount of shape difference and the diversity of the shape changes evolved across the group. However, mapping the divergence of SShD onto the phylogeny of the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup indicated that there is little phylogenetic signal. Finally, allometry accounted for a substantial part of SShD, but did not explain the bulk of evolutionary divergence in SShD because allometry itself was found to be evolutionarily plastic.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>SShD in the <it>Drosophila </it>wing can evolve rapidly and therefore shows only weak phylogenetic structure. The variable contribution of allometric and non-allometric components to the evolutionary divergence of SShD and the evolutionary plasticity of allometry suggest that SShD and allometry are influenced by a complex interaction of processes.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/9/110
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Baylac Michel
Gidaszewski Nelly A
Klingenberg Christian
spellingShingle Baylac Michel
Gidaszewski Nelly A
Klingenberg Christian
Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup
BMC Evolutionary Biology
author_facet Baylac Michel
Gidaszewski Nelly A
Klingenberg Christian
author_sort Baylac Michel
title Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup
title_short Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup
title_full Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup
title_fullStr Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup
title_sort evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the <it>drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup
publisher BMC
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
issn 1471-2148
publishDate 2009-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sexual dimorphism of body size has been the subject of numerous studies, but few have examined sexual shape dimorphism (SShD) and its evolution. Allometry, the shape change associated with size variation, has been suggested to be a main component of SShD. Yet little is known about the relative importance of the allometric and non-allometric components for the evolution of SShD.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We investigated sexual dimorphism in wing shape in the nine species of the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup. We used geometric morphometrics to characterise wing shape and found significant SShD in all nine species. The amount of shape difference and the diversity of the shape changes evolved across the group. However, mapping the divergence of SShD onto the phylogeny of the <it>Drosophila melanogaster </it>subgroup indicated that there is little phylogenetic signal. Finally, allometry accounted for a substantial part of SShD, but did not explain the bulk of evolutionary divergence in SShD because allometry itself was found to be evolutionarily plastic.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>SShD in the <it>Drosophila </it>wing can evolve rapidly and therefore shows only weak phylogenetic structure. The variable contribution of allometric and non-allometric components to the evolutionary divergence of SShD and the evolutionary plasticity of allometry suggest that SShD and allometry are influenced by a complex interaction of processes.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/9/110
work_keys_str_mv AT baylacmichel evolutionofsexualdimorphismofwingshapeintheitdrosophilamelanogasteritsubgroup
AT gidaszewskinellya evolutionofsexualdimorphismofwingshapeintheitdrosophilamelanogasteritsubgroup
AT klingenbergchristian evolutionofsexualdimorphismofwingshapeintheitdrosophilamelanogasteritsubgroup
_version_ 1721179977328623616