A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study

Abstract Background Although older adults encompass almost half of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, it remains unclear which long-term hemodialysis vascular access type, arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, is optimal with respect to effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Cli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariana Murea, Randolph L. Geary, Denise K. Houston, Matthew S. Edwards, Todd W. Robinson, Ross P. Davis, Justin B. Hurie, Timothy K. Williams, Gabriela Velazquez-Ramirez, Benjamin Bagwell, Audrey B. Tuttle, Shahriar Moossavi, Michael V. Rocco, Barry I. Freedman, Jeff D. Williamson, Haiying Chen, Jasmin Divers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00619-9
id doaj-b88d8e387006450a9aa3a119d00d08ab
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariana Murea
Randolph L. Geary
Denise K. Houston
Matthew S. Edwards
Todd W. Robinson
Ross P. Davis
Justin B. Hurie
Timothy K. Williams
Gabriela Velazquez-Ramirez
Benjamin Bagwell
Audrey B. Tuttle
Shahriar Moossavi
Michael V. Rocco
Barry I. Freedman
Jeff D. Williamson
Haiying Chen
Jasmin Divers
spellingShingle Mariana Murea
Randolph L. Geary
Denise K. Houston
Matthew S. Edwards
Todd W. Robinson
Ross P. Davis
Justin B. Hurie
Timothy K. Williams
Gabriela Velazquez-Ramirez
Benjamin Bagwell
Audrey B. Tuttle
Shahriar Moossavi
Michael V. Rocco
Barry I. Freedman
Jeff D. Williamson
Haiying Chen
Jasmin Divers
A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Arteriovenous vascular access
Hemodialysis
Kidney disease
Older adults
Randomized trial
author_facet Mariana Murea
Randolph L. Geary
Denise K. Houston
Matthew S. Edwards
Todd W. Robinson
Ross P. Davis
Justin B. Hurie
Timothy K. Williams
Gabriela Velazquez-Ramirez
Benjamin Bagwell
Audrey B. Tuttle
Shahriar Moossavi
Michael V. Rocco
Barry I. Freedman
Jeff D. Williamson
Haiying Chen
Jasmin Divers
author_sort Mariana Murea
title A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study
title_short A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study
title_full A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study
title_fullStr A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study
title_sort randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility study
publisher BMC
series Pilot and Feasibility Studies
issn 2055-5784
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Background Although older adults encompass almost half of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, it remains unclear which long-term hemodialysis vascular access type, arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, is optimal with respect to effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Clinical outcomes based on the initial AV access type have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. This pilot study tested the feasibility of randomizing older adults with advanced kidney disease to initial arteriovenous fistula versus graft vascular access surgery. Methods Patients 65 years or older with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease or incident end-stage kidney disease and no prior arteriovenous vascular access intervention were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo surgical placement of a fistula or a graft after providing informed consent. Trial feasibility was evaluated as (i) recruitment of ≥ 70% of eligible participants, (ii) ≥ 50 to 70% of participants undergo placement of index arteriovenous access within 90 to 180 days of enrollment, respectively, (iii) ≥ 80% adherence to study-related assessments, and (iv) ≥ 70% of participants who underwent index arteriovenous access placement will have a follow-up duration of ≥ 12 months after index surgery date. Results Between September 2018 and October 2019, 81% (44/54) of eligible participants consented and were enrolled in the study; 11 had pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease, and 33 had incident or prevalent end-stage kidney disease. After randomization, 100% (21/21) assigned to arteriovenous fistula surgery and 78% (18/23) assigned to arteriovenous graft surgery underwent index arteriovenous access placement within a median (1st, 3rd quartile) of 5.0 (1.0, 14.0) days and 13.0 (5.0, 44.3) days, respectively, after referral to vascular surgery. The completion rates for study-specific assessments ranged between 40.0 and 88.6%. At median follow-up of 215.0 days, 5 participants expired, 7 completed 12 months of follow-up, and 29 are actively being followed. Assessments of grip strength, functional independence, and vascular access satisfaction were completed by > 85% of patients who reached pre-specified post-operative assessment time point. Conclusions Results from this study reveal it is feasible to enroll and randomize older adults with advanced kidney disease to one of two different arteriovenous vascular access placement surgeries. The study can progress with minor protocol adjustments to a multisite clinical trial. Trial registration Clinical Trials ID, NCT03545113 .
topic Arteriovenous vascular access
Hemodialysis
Kidney disease
Older adults
Randomized trial
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00619-9
work_keys_str_mv AT marianamurea arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT randolphlgeary arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT denisekhouston arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT matthewsedwards arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT toddwrobinson arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT rosspdavis arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT justinbhurie arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT timothykwilliams arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT gabrielavelazquezramirez arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT benjaminbagwell arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT audreybtuttle arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT shahriarmoossavi arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT michaelvrocco arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT barryifreedman arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT jeffdwilliamson arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT haiyingchen arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT jasmindivers arandomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT marianamurea randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT randolphlgeary randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT denisekhouston randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT matthewsedwards randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT toddwrobinson randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT rosspdavis randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT justinbhurie randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT timothykwilliams randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT gabrielavelazquezramirez randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT benjaminbagwell randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT audreybtuttle randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT shahriarmoossavi randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT michaelvrocco randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT barryifreedman randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT jeffdwilliamson randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT haiyingchen randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT jasmindivers randomizedpilotstudytoevaluategraftversusfistulavascularaccessstrategyinolderpatientswithadvancedkidneydiseaseresultsofafeasibilitystudy
_version_ 1724673469988208640
spelling doaj-b88d8e387006450a9aa3a119d00d08ab2020-11-25T03:06:36ZengBMCPilot and Feasibility Studies2055-57842020-06-016111510.1186/s40814-020-00619-9A randomized pilot study to evaluate graft versus fistula vascular access strategy in older patients with advanced kidney disease: results of a feasibility studyMariana Murea0Randolph L. Geary1Denise K. Houston2Matthew S. Edwards3Todd W. Robinson4Ross P. Davis5Justin B. Hurie6Timothy K. Williams7Gabriela Velazquez-Ramirez8Benjamin Bagwell9Audrey B. Tuttle10Shahriar Moossavi11Michael V. Rocco12Barry I. Freedman13Jeff D. Williamson14Haiying Chen15Jasmin Divers16Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest School of MedicineSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest School of MedicineSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of MedicineDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of MedicineDivision of Health Services Research, Department of Foundations of Medicine, NYU Long Island School of MedicineAbstract Background Although older adults encompass almost half of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, it remains unclear which long-term hemodialysis vascular access type, arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, is optimal with respect to effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Clinical outcomes based on the initial AV access type have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. This pilot study tested the feasibility of randomizing older adults with advanced kidney disease to initial arteriovenous fistula versus graft vascular access surgery. Methods Patients 65 years or older with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease or incident end-stage kidney disease and no prior arteriovenous vascular access intervention were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo surgical placement of a fistula or a graft after providing informed consent. Trial feasibility was evaluated as (i) recruitment of ≥ 70% of eligible participants, (ii) ≥ 50 to 70% of participants undergo placement of index arteriovenous access within 90 to 180 days of enrollment, respectively, (iii) ≥ 80% adherence to study-related assessments, and (iv) ≥ 70% of participants who underwent index arteriovenous access placement will have a follow-up duration of ≥ 12 months after index surgery date. Results Between September 2018 and October 2019, 81% (44/54) of eligible participants consented and were enrolled in the study; 11 had pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease, and 33 had incident or prevalent end-stage kidney disease. After randomization, 100% (21/21) assigned to arteriovenous fistula surgery and 78% (18/23) assigned to arteriovenous graft surgery underwent index arteriovenous access placement within a median (1st, 3rd quartile) of 5.0 (1.0, 14.0) days and 13.0 (5.0, 44.3) days, respectively, after referral to vascular surgery. The completion rates for study-specific assessments ranged between 40.0 and 88.6%. At median follow-up of 215.0 days, 5 participants expired, 7 completed 12 months of follow-up, and 29 are actively being followed. Assessments of grip strength, functional independence, and vascular access satisfaction were completed by > 85% of patients who reached pre-specified post-operative assessment time point. Conclusions Results from this study reveal it is feasible to enroll and randomize older adults with advanced kidney disease to one of two different arteriovenous vascular access placement surgeries. The study can progress with minor protocol adjustments to a multisite clinical trial. Trial registration Clinical Trials ID, NCT03545113 .http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00619-9Arteriovenous vascular accessHemodialysisKidney diseaseOlder adultsRandomized trial