The Shape of Native Plant Cellulose Microfibrils

Abstract Determining the shape of plant cellulose microfibrils is critical for understanding plant cell wall molecular architecture and conversion of cellulose into biofuels. Only recently has it been determined that these cellulose microfibrils are composed of 18 cellulose chains rather than 36 pol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James D. Kubicki, Hui Yang, Daisuke Sawada, Hugh O’Neill, Daniel Oehme, Daniel Cosgrove
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2018-09-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32211-w
id doaj-b8c5d32b35184f31badf469412f94867
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8c5d32b35184f31badf469412f948672020-12-08T05:55:46ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222018-09-01811810.1038/s41598-018-32211-wThe Shape of Native Plant Cellulose MicrofibrilsJames D. Kubicki0Hui Yang1Daisuke Sawada2Hugh O’Neill3Daniel Oehme4Daniel Cosgrove5Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El PasoDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State UniversityDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto UniversityNeutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El PasoDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstract Determining the shape of plant cellulose microfibrils is critical for understanding plant cell wall molecular architecture and conversion of cellulose into biofuels. Only recently has it been determined that these cellulose microfibrils are composed of 18 cellulose chains rather than 36 polymers arranged in a diamond-shaped pattern. This study uses density functional theory calculations to model three possible habits for the 18-chain microfibril and compares the calculated energies, structures, 13C NMR chemical shifts and WAXS diffractograms of each to evaluate which shape is most probable. Each model is capable of reproducing experimentally-observed data to some extent, but based on relative theoretical energies and reasonable reproduction of all variables considered, a microfibril based on 5 layers in a 34443 arrangement is predicted to be the most probable. A habit based on a 234432 arrangement is slightly less favored, and a 6 × 3 arrangement is considered improbable.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32211-wCellulose Microfibrils (CMF)Plant CMFWAXS DiffractogramsWide-angle X-ray Diffraction (WAXS)WAXS Peak
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James D. Kubicki
Hui Yang
Daisuke Sawada
Hugh O’Neill
Daniel Oehme
Daniel Cosgrove
spellingShingle James D. Kubicki
Hui Yang
Daisuke Sawada
Hugh O’Neill
Daniel Oehme
Daniel Cosgrove
The Shape of Native Plant Cellulose Microfibrils
Scientific Reports
Cellulose Microfibrils (CMF)
Plant CMF
WAXS Diffractograms
Wide-angle X-ray Diffraction (WAXS)
WAXS Peak
author_facet James D. Kubicki
Hui Yang
Daisuke Sawada
Hugh O’Neill
Daniel Oehme
Daniel Cosgrove
author_sort James D. Kubicki
title The Shape of Native Plant Cellulose Microfibrils
title_short The Shape of Native Plant Cellulose Microfibrils
title_full The Shape of Native Plant Cellulose Microfibrils
title_fullStr The Shape of Native Plant Cellulose Microfibrils
title_full_unstemmed The Shape of Native Plant Cellulose Microfibrils
title_sort shape of native plant cellulose microfibrils
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Abstract Determining the shape of plant cellulose microfibrils is critical for understanding plant cell wall molecular architecture and conversion of cellulose into biofuels. Only recently has it been determined that these cellulose microfibrils are composed of 18 cellulose chains rather than 36 polymers arranged in a diamond-shaped pattern. This study uses density functional theory calculations to model three possible habits for the 18-chain microfibril and compares the calculated energies, structures, 13C NMR chemical shifts and WAXS diffractograms of each to evaluate which shape is most probable. Each model is capable of reproducing experimentally-observed data to some extent, but based on relative theoretical energies and reasonable reproduction of all variables considered, a microfibril based on 5 layers in a 34443 arrangement is predicted to be the most probable. A habit based on a 234432 arrangement is slightly less favored, and a 6 × 3 arrangement is considered improbable.
topic Cellulose Microfibrils (CMF)
Plant CMF
WAXS Diffractograms
Wide-angle X-ray Diffraction (WAXS)
WAXS Peak
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32211-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesdkubicki theshapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT huiyang theshapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT daisukesawada theshapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT hughoneill theshapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT danieloehme theshapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT danielcosgrove theshapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT jamesdkubicki shapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT huiyang shapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT daisukesawada shapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT hughoneill shapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT danieloehme shapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
AT danielcosgrove shapeofnativeplantcellulosemicrofibrils
_version_ 1724391561530179584