Relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapse

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Mitral valve thickness is used as a criterion to distinguish the classical from the non-classical form of mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Classical form of MVP has been associated with higher risk of mitral regurgitation (MR) and concom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sénéchal Mario, Michaud Nicolas, MacHaalany Jimmy, Bernier Mathieu, Dubois Michelle, Magne Julien, Couture Christian, Mathieu Patrick, Bertrand Olivier F, Voisine Pierre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-01-01
Series:Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/10/1/3
id doaj-b8ceb26c1e8c43ecb18549835869dd12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8ceb26c1e8c43ecb18549835869dd122020-11-25T00:16:50ZengBMCCardiovascular Ultrasound1476-71202012-01-01101310.1186/1476-7120-10-3Relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapseSénéchal MarioMichaud NicolasMacHaalany JimmyBernier MathieuDubois MichelleMagne JulienCouture ChristianMathieu PatrickBertrand Olivier FVoisine Pierre<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Mitral valve thickness is used as a criterion to distinguish the classical from the non-classical form of mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Classical form of MVP has been associated with higher risk of mitral regurgitation (MR) and concomitant complications. We sought to determine the relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with MVP.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We prospectively analyzed transthoracic echocardiograms of 38 consecutive patients with MVP and various degrees of MR. In the parasternal long-axis view, leaflets length, diastolic leaflet thickness, prolapsing depth, billowing area and non-coaptation distance between both leaflets were measured.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty patients (53%) and 18 patients (47%) were identified as having moderate to severe and mild MR respectively (ERO = 45 ± 27 mm<sup>2 </sup>vs. 5 ± 7 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.001). Diastolic leaflet thickness was similar in both groups (5.5 ± 0.9 mm vs. 5.3 ± 1 mm, p = 0.57). On multivariate analysis, the non-coaptation distance (OR 7.9 per 1 mm increase; 95% CI 1.72-37.2) was associated with significant MR. Thick mitral valve leaflet as traditionally reported (≥ 5 mm) was not associated with significant MR (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.2-3.4).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In patients with MVP, thick mitral leaflet is not associated with significant MR. Leaflet thickness is probably not as important in risk stratification as previously reported in patients with MVP. Other anatomical and geometrical features of the mitral valve apparatus area appear to be much more closely related to MR severity.</p> http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/10/1/3mitral regurgitationmitral valveechocardiographymitral valve prolapse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sénéchal Mario
Michaud Nicolas
MacHaalany Jimmy
Bernier Mathieu
Dubois Michelle
Magne Julien
Couture Christian
Mathieu Patrick
Bertrand Olivier F
Voisine Pierre
spellingShingle Sénéchal Mario
Michaud Nicolas
MacHaalany Jimmy
Bernier Mathieu
Dubois Michelle
Magne Julien
Couture Christian
Mathieu Patrick
Bertrand Olivier F
Voisine Pierre
Relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapse
Cardiovascular Ultrasound
mitral regurgitation
mitral valve
echocardiography
mitral valve prolapse
author_facet Sénéchal Mario
Michaud Nicolas
MacHaalany Jimmy
Bernier Mathieu
Dubois Michelle
Magne Julien
Couture Christian
Mathieu Patrick
Bertrand Olivier F
Voisine Pierre
author_sort Sénéchal Mario
title Relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapse
title_short Relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapse
title_full Relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapse
title_fullStr Relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapse
title_sort relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with mitral valve prolapse
publisher BMC
series Cardiovascular Ultrasound
issn 1476-7120
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Mitral valve thickness is used as a criterion to distinguish the classical from the non-classical form of mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Classical form of MVP has been associated with higher risk of mitral regurgitation (MR) and concomitant complications. We sought to determine the relation of mitral valve morphology and motion to mitral regurgitation severity in patients with MVP.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We prospectively analyzed transthoracic echocardiograms of 38 consecutive patients with MVP and various degrees of MR. In the parasternal long-axis view, leaflets length, diastolic leaflet thickness, prolapsing depth, billowing area and non-coaptation distance between both leaflets were measured.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty patients (53%) and 18 patients (47%) were identified as having moderate to severe and mild MR respectively (ERO = 45 ± 27 mm<sup>2 </sup>vs. 5 ± 7 mm<sup>2</sup>, p < 0.001). Diastolic leaflet thickness was similar in both groups (5.5 ± 0.9 mm vs. 5.3 ± 1 mm, p = 0.57). On multivariate analysis, the non-coaptation distance (OR 7.9 per 1 mm increase; 95% CI 1.72-37.2) was associated with significant MR. Thick mitral valve leaflet as traditionally reported (≥ 5 mm) was not associated with significant MR (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.2-3.4).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In patients with MVP, thick mitral leaflet is not associated with significant MR. Leaflet thickness is probably not as important in risk stratification as previously reported in patients with MVP. Other anatomical and geometrical features of the mitral valve apparatus area appear to be much more closely related to MR severity.</p>
topic mitral regurgitation
mitral valve
echocardiography
mitral valve prolapse
url http://www.cardiovascularultrasound.com/content/10/1/3
work_keys_str_mv AT senechalmario relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT michaudnicolas relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT machaalanyjimmy relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT berniermathieu relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT duboismichelle relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT magnejulien relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT couturechristian relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT mathieupatrick relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT bertrandolivierf relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
AT voisinepierre relationofmitralvalvemorphologyandmotiontomitralregurgitationseverityinpatientswithmitralvalveprolapse
_version_ 1725382189297696768