Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study

Abstract Background Collaborative interprofessional practices are essential in caring for people with complex mental health problems. Despite the difficulties of demonstrating positive impacts of interprofessional education (IPE), it is believed to enhance interprofessional practices. We aimed to as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Marcussen, Birgitte Nørgaard, Karen Borgnakke, Sidse Arnfred
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-020-02616-x
id doaj-b8d4d9ffc3554f08beff9aa4e28ad956
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8d4d9ffc3554f08beff9aa4e28ad9562020-11-25T03:00:36ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2020-05-012011910.1186/s12888-020-02616-xImproved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention studyMichael Marcussen0Birgitte Nørgaard1Karen Borgnakke2Sidse Arnfred3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen and Psychiatry Slagelse, Region Zealand Mental Health ServiceDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of CopenhagenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen and Psychiatry Slagelse, Region Zealand Mental Health ServiceAbstract Background Collaborative interprofessional practices are essential in caring for people with complex mental health problems. Despite the difficulties of demonstrating positive impacts of interprofessional education (IPE), it is believed to enhance interprofessional practices. We aimed to assess impacts on patient satisfaction, self-reported psychological distress and mental health status in a psychiatric ward. Methods We conducted a nonrandomized intervention study with patient satisfaction, psychological distress, and health status as outcomes. Mental health inpatients were referred to either an interprofessional training unit (intervention group) or to a conventionally organized ward (comparison group). Outcomes were assessed using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Results The intervention group included 129 patients, the comparison group 123. The former group reported better mental health status than the latter; the postintervention mean difference between them being 5.30 (95% CI 2.71–7.89; p = 0.001; SF-36), with an effect size of 0.24. The intervention group patients also scored higher on satisfaction (mean difference 1.01; 95% CI 0.06–1.96; p = 0.04), with an effect size of 0.31. The groups’ mean scores of psychological distress were identical. Conclusion Our results support the hypothesized value of interprofessional training: intervention group patients reported higher scores regarding mental health status and satisfaction than did comparison group patients. As IPE interventions have rarely involved patients and fewer have taken place in practice settings, further research into both the processes and the long-term effects of IPE in mental healthcare is needed. Trial registration The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03070977 on March 6, 2017.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-020-02616-x*Patient-reported outcomes*PRO*Interprofessional training*IPE*Team-based care*Mental health services
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Marcussen
Birgitte Nørgaard
Karen Borgnakke
Sidse Arnfred
spellingShingle Michael Marcussen
Birgitte Nørgaard
Karen Borgnakke
Sidse Arnfred
Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study
BMC Psychiatry
*Patient-reported outcomes
*PRO
*Interprofessional training
*IPE
*Team-based care
*Mental health services
author_facet Michael Marcussen
Birgitte Nørgaard
Karen Borgnakke
Sidse Arnfred
author_sort Michael Marcussen
title Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study
title_short Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study
title_full Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study
title_fullStr Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study
title_sort improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study
publisher BMC
series BMC Psychiatry
issn 1471-244X
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background Collaborative interprofessional practices are essential in caring for people with complex mental health problems. Despite the difficulties of demonstrating positive impacts of interprofessional education (IPE), it is believed to enhance interprofessional practices. We aimed to assess impacts on patient satisfaction, self-reported psychological distress and mental health status in a psychiatric ward. Methods We conducted a nonrandomized intervention study with patient satisfaction, psychological distress, and health status as outcomes. Mental health inpatients were referred to either an interprofessional training unit (intervention group) or to a conventionally organized ward (comparison group). Outcomes were assessed using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Results The intervention group included 129 patients, the comparison group 123. The former group reported better mental health status than the latter; the postintervention mean difference between them being 5.30 (95% CI 2.71–7.89; p = 0.001; SF-36), with an effect size of 0.24. The intervention group patients also scored higher on satisfaction (mean difference 1.01; 95% CI 0.06–1.96; p = 0.04), with an effect size of 0.31. The groups’ mean scores of psychological distress were identical. Conclusion Our results support the hypothesized value of interprofessional training: intervention group patients reported higher scores regarding mental health status and satisfaction than did comparison group patients. As IPE interventions have rarely involved patients and fewer have taken place in practice settings, further research into both the processes and the long-term effects of IPE in mental healthcare is needed. Trial registration The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03070977 on March 6, 2017.
topic *Patient-reported outcomes
*PRO
*Interprofessional training
*IPE
*Team-based care
*Mental health services
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-020-02616-x
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelmarcussen improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafterinterprofessionaltraininginmentalhealthanonrandomizedinterventionstudy
AT birgittenørgaard improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafterinterprofessionaltraininginmentalhealthanonrandomizedinterventionstudy
AT karenborgnakke improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafterinterprofessionaltraininginmentalhealthanonrandomizedinterventionstudy
AT sidsearnfred improvedpatientreportedoutcomesafterinterprofessionaltraininginmentalhealthanonrandomizedinterventionstudy
_version_ 1724697134039564288