Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System

The evaluation of several climatological background-error covariance matrix (defined as the B matrix) estimation methods was performed using the ALADIN limited-area modeling data-assimilation system at a 4 km horizontal grid spacing. The B matrices compared were derived using the standard National M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Stanesic, Kristian Horvath, Endi Keresturi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-09-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
NWP
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/10/570
id doaj-b8e3f3640124421ea16633eeea6f4931
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8e3f3640124421ea16633eeea6f49312020-11-24T20:53:43ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332019-09-01101057010.3390/atmos10100570atmos10100570Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation SystemAntonio Stanesic0Kristian Horvath1Endi Keresturi2Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service, Gric 3, 10000 Zagreb, CroatiaCroatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service, Gric 3, 10000 Zagreb, CroatiaCroatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service, Gric 3, 10000 Zagreb, CroatiaThe evaluation of several climatological background-error covariance matrix (defined as the B matrix) estimation methods was performed using the ALADIN limited-area modeling data-assimilation system at a 4 km horizontal grid spacing. The B matrices compared were derived using the standard National Meteorological Center (NMC) and ensemble-based estimation methods. To test the influence of lateral boundary condition (LBC) perturbations on the characteristics of ensemble-based B matrix, two ensemble prediction systems were established: one used unperturbed lateral boundary conditions (ENS) and another used perturbed lateral boundary conditions (ENSLBC). The characteristics of the three B matrices were compared through a diagnostic comparison, while the influence of the different B matrices on the analysis and quality of the forecast were evaluated for the ENSLBC and NMC matrices. The results showed that the lateral boundary condition perturbations affected all the control variables, while the smallest influence was found for the specific humidity. The diagnostic comparison showed that the ensemble-based estimation method shifted the correlations toward the smaller spatial scales, while the LBC perturbations gave rise to larger spatial scales. The influence on the analysis showed a smaller spatial correlation for the ensemble B matrix compared to that of the NMC, with the most pronounced differences for the specific humidity. The verification of the forecast showed modest improvement for the experiment with the ensemble B matrix. Among the methods tested, the results suggest that the ensemble-based data-assimilation method is the favorable approach for background-error covariance calculation in high-resolution limited-area data assimilation systems.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/10/570B matrixdata assimilationNWPALADIN
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonio Stanesic
Kristian Horvath
Endi Keresturi
spellingShingle Antonio Stanesic
Kristian Horvath
Endi Keresturi
Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System
Atmosphere
B matrix
data assimilation
NWP
ALADIN
author_facet Antonio Stanesic
Kristian Horvath
Endi Keresturi
author_sort Antonio Stanesic
title Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System
title_short Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System
title_full Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System
title_fullStr Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of NMC and Ensemble-Based Climatological Background-Error Covariances in an Operational Limited-Area Data Assimilation System
title_sort comparison of nmc and ensemble-based climatological background-error covariances in an operational limited-area data assimilation system
publisher MDPI AG
series Atmosphere
issn 2073-4433
publishDate 2019-09-01
description The evaluation of several climatological background-error covariance matrix (defined as the B matrix) estimation methods was performed using the ALADIN limited-area modeling data-assimilation system at a 4 km horizontal grid spacing. The B matrices compared were derived using the standard National Meteorological Center (NMC) and ensemble-based estimation methods. To test the influence of lateral boundary condition (LBC) perturbations on the characteristics of ensemble-based B matrix, two ensemble prediction systems were established: one used unperturbed lateral boundary conditions (ENS) and another used perturbed lateral boundary conditions (ENSLBC). The characteristics of the three B matrices were compared through a diagnostic comparison, while the influence of the different B matrices on the analysis and quality of the forecast were evaluated for the ENSLBC and NMC matrices. The results showed that the lateral boundary condition perturbations affected all the control variables, while the smallest influence was found for the specific humidity. The diagnostic comparison showed that the ensemble-based estimation method shifted the correlations toward the smaller spatial scales, while the LBC perturbations gave rise to larger spatial scales. The influence on the analysis showed a smaller spatial correlation for the ensemble B matrix compared to that of the NMC, with the most pronounced differences for the specific humidity. The verification of the forecast showed modest improvement for the experiment with the ensemble B matrix. Among the methods tested, the results suggest that the ensemble-based data-assimilation method is the favorable approach for background-error covariance calculation in high-resolution limited-area data assimilation systems.
topic B matrix
data assimilation
NWP
ALADIN
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/10/570
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniostanesic comparisonofnmcandensemblebasedclimatologicalbackgrounderrorcovariancesinanoperationallimitedareadataassimilationsystem
AT kristianhorvath comparisonofnmcandensemblebasedclimatologicalbackgrounderrorcovariancesinanoperationallimitedareadataassimilationsystem
AT endikeresturi comparisonofnmcandensemblebasedclimatologicalbackgrounderrorcovariancesinanoperationallimitedareadataassimilationsystem
_version_ 1716796401689559040