Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anaemic status is determined by haemoglobin using the HemoCue system or haematocrit measurements, and a threefold conversion is commonly used to equate the two measures (haemoglobin = haematocrit/3). The validity of this conversion i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Owusu-Agyei Seth, Drakeley Chris J, Carneiro Ilona A, Mmbando Bruno, Chandramohan Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-05-01
Series:Malaria Journal
Online Access:http://www.malariajournal.com/content/6/1/67
id doaj-b8f09e74d6c641c78cccb2ed789fa5b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8f09e74d6c641c78cccb2ed789fa5b72020-11-24T20:53:40ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752007-05-01616710.1186/1475-2875-6-67Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?Owusu-Agyei SethDrakeley Chris JCarneiro Ilona AMmbando BrunoChandramohan Daniel<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anaemic status is determined by haemoglobin using the HemoCue system or haematocrit measurements, and a threefold conversion is commonly used to equate the two measures (haemoglobin = haematocrit/3). The validity of this conversion in malaria endemic settings was assessed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Concurrent measures of haemoglobin and centrifuged haematocrit in children aged 6–59 months were compared by modelling the difference between the two measures against their average. A random effects linear regression of the difference of the measures on their average was used to describe the line of best agreement and 95% limits of agreement for these two measures over a range of values after adjusting for statistically significant covariates.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was a consistent bias between the two measures, with haemoglobin less than haematocrit/3 in 87% (899/1,030) of observations. This difference was non-uniform, decreasing with the average measure, i.e. less difference at higher haemoglobin and haematocrit values. In these studies, use of haematocrit would have underestimated the prevalence of anaemia by misclassifying 10% (89/920) of individuals with haemoglobin < 11 g/dl, 66% (252/380) of individuals with haemoglobin < 8 g/dl and 100% (23/23) of individuals with haemoglobin < 5 g/dl. The mean difference between the measures was greater in males than females, increased with age between 6–59 months, and was greater in the wet than dry season suggesting that the relationship between haemoglobin and haematocrit may be modified by exposure to malaria.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The regression model indicated that the standard threefold conversion from haematocrit to haemoglobin underestimates the prevalence of haemoglobin < 11 g/dl in children under five years of age in malaria endemic settings. This bias was more acute for more severe anaemia defined by haemoglobin < 8 g/dl and haemoglobin < 5 g/dl. This has important implications for the comparability of studies using these different measures. Direct determination of haemoglobin should be the measurement of choice for assessing anaemia outcomes in malaria intervention trials and surveys.</p> http://www.malariajournal.com/content/6/1/67
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Owusu-Agyei Seth
Drakeley Chris J
Carneiro Ilona A
Mmbando Bruno
Chandramohan Daniel
spellingShingle Owusu-Agyei Seth
Drakeley Chris J
Carneiro Ilona A
Mmbando Bruno
Chandramohan Daniel
Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?
Malaria Journal
author_facet Owusu-Agyei Seth
Drakeley Chris J
Carneiro Ilona A
Mmbando Bruno
Chandramohan Daniel
author_sort Owusu-Agyei Seth
title Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?
title_short Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?
title_full Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?
title_fullStr Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?
title_full_unstemmed Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?
title_sort haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?
publisher BMC
series Malaria Journal
issn 1475-2875
publishDate 2007-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anaemic status is determined by haemoglobin using the HemoCue system or haematocrit measurements, and a threefold conversion is commonly used to equate the two measures (haemoglobin = haematocrit/3). The validity of this conversion in malaria endemic settings was assessed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Concurrent measures of haemoglobin and centrifuged haematocrit in children aged 6–59 months were compared by modelling the difference between the two measures against their average. A random effects linear regression of the difference of the measures on their average was used to describe the line of best agreement and 95% limits of agreement for these two measures over a range of values after adjusting for statistically significant covariates.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was a consistent bias between the two measures, with haemoglobin less than haematocrit/3 in 87% (899/1,030) of observations. This difference was non-uniform, decreasing with the average measure, i.e. less difference at higher haemoglobin and haematocrit values. In these studies, use of haematocrit would have underestimated the prevalence of anaemia by misclassifying 10% (89/920) of individuals with haemoglobin < 11 g/dl, 66% (252/380) of individuals with haemoglobin < 8 g/dl and 100% (23/23) of individuals with haemoglobin < 5 g/dl. The mean difference between the measures was greater in males than females, increased with age between 6–59 months, and was greater in the wet than dry season suggesting that the relationship between haemoglobin and haematocrit may be modified by exposure to malaria.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The regression model indicated that the standard threefold conversion from haematocrit to haemoglobin underestimates the prevalence of haemoglobin < 11 g/dl in children under five years of age in malaria endemic settings. This bias was more acute for more severe anaemia defined by haemoglobin < 8 g/dl and haemoglobin < 5 g/dl. This has important implications for the comparability of studies using these different measures. Direct determination of haemoglobin should be the measurement of choice for assessing anaemia outcomes in malaria intervention trials and surveys.</p>
url http://www.malariajournal.com/content/6/1/67
work_keys_str_mv AT owusuagyeiseth haemoglobinandhaematocritisthethreefoldconversionvalidforassessinganaemiainmalariaendemicsettings
AT drakeleychrisj haemoglobinandhaematocritisthethreefoldconversionvalidforassessinganaemiainmalariaendemicsettings
AT carneiroilonaa haemoglobinandhaematocritisthethreefoldconversionvalidforassessinganaemiainmalariaendemicsettings
AT mmbandobruno haemoglobinandhaematocritisthethreefoldconversionvalidforassessinganaemiainmalariaendemicsettings
AT chandramohandaniel haemoglobinandhaematocritisthethreefoldconversionvalidforassessinganaemiainmalariaendemicsettings
_version_ 1716796548405264384