Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired Innovation

The disparity between disciplinary approaches to bioinspired innovation has created a cultural divide that is stifling to the overall advancement of the approach for sustainable societies. This paper aims to advance the effectiveness of bioinspired innovation processes for positive benefits through...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taryn Mead, David Coley, D. Scott Borden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Biomimetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/5/4/60
id doaj-b91da3f1c5634002b0c1adb1d6e81c13
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b91da3f1c5634002b0c1adb1d6e81c132020-11-25T04:04:37ZengMDPI AGBiomimetics2313-76732020-11-015606010.3390/biomimetics5040060Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired InnovationTaryn Mead0David Coley1D. Scott Borden2School of Business, Western Colorado University, Gunnison, CO 81231, USADepartment of Architecture & Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UKSchool of Business, Western Colorado University, Gunnison, CO 81231, USAThe disparity between disciplinary approaches to bioinspired innovation has created a cultural divide that is stifling to the overall advancement of the approach for sustainable societies. This paper aims to advance the effectiveness of bioinspired innovation processes for positive benefits through interdisciplinary communication by exploring the epistemological assumptions in various fields that contribute to the discipline. We propose that there is a shift in epistemological assumptions within bioinspired innovation processes at the points where biological models derived from reductionist approaches are interpreted as socially-constructed design principles, which are then realized in practical settings wrought with complexity and multiplicity. This epistemological shift from one position to another frequently leaves practitioners with erroneous assumptions due to a naturalistic fallacy. Drawing on examples in biology, we provide three recommendations to improve the clarity of the dialogue amongst interdisciplinary teams. (1) The deliberate articulation of epistemological perspectives amongst team members. (2) The application of a gradient orientation towards sustainability instead of a dichotomous orientation. (3) Ongoing dialogue and further research to develop novel epistemological approaches towards the topic. Adopting these recommendations could further advance the effectiveness of bioinspired innovation processes to positively impact social and ecological systems.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/5/4/60bioinspired innovationbiomimicrybiomimeticsbioinspired designepistemologysustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taryn Mead
David Coley
D. Scott Borden
spellingShingle Taryn Mead
David Coley
D. Scott Borden
Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired Innovation
Biomimetics
bioinspired innovation
biomimicry
biomimetics
bioinspired design
epistemology
sustainability
author_facet Taryn Mead
David Coley
D. Scott Borden
author_sort Taryn Mead
title Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired Innovation
title_short Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired Innovation
title_full Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired Innovation
title_fullStr Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired Innovation
title_full_unstemmed Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired Innovation
title_sort navigating the tower of babel: the epistemological shift of bioinspired innovation
publisher MDPI AG
series Biomimetics
issn 2313-7673
publishDate 2020-11-01
description The disparity between disciplinary approaches to bioinspired innovation has created a cultural divide that is stifling to the overall advancement of the approach for sustainable societies. This paper aims to advance the effectiveness of bioinspired innovation processes for positive benefits through interdisciplinary communication by exploring the epistemological assumptions in various fields that contribute to the discipline. We propose that there is a shift in epistemological assumptions within bioinspired innovation processes at the points where biological models derived from reductionist approaches are interpreted as socially-constructed design principles, which are then realized in practical settings wrought with complexity and multiplicity. This epistemological shift from one position to another frequently leaves practitioners with erroneous assumptions due to a naturalistic fallacy. Drawing on examples in biology, we provide three recommendations to improve the clarity of the dialogue amongst interdisciplinary teams. (1) The deliberate articulation of epistemological perspectives amongst team members. (2) The application of a gradient orientation towards sustainability instead of a dichotomous orientation. (3) Ongoing dialogue and further research to develop novel epistemological approaches towards the topic. Adopting these recommendations could further advance the effectiveness of bioinspired innovation processes to positively impact social and ecological systems.
topic bioinspired innovation
biomimicry
biomimetics
bioinspired design
epistemology
sustainability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/5/4/60
work_keys_str_mv AT tarynmead navigatingthetowerofbabeltheepistemologicalshiftofbioinspiredinnovation
AT davidcoley navigatingthetowerofbabeltheepistemologicalshiftofbioinspiredinnovation
AT dscottborden navigatingthetowerofbabeltheepistemologicalshiftofbioinspiredinnovation
_version_ 1724435979369971712