Payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.

BACKGROUND:While the rise in opioid analgesic prescribing and overdose deaths was multifactorial, financial relationships between opioid drug manufacturers and physicians may be one important factor. METHODS:Using national data from 2013 to 2015, we conducted a retrospective cohort study linking the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark A Zezza, Marcus A Bachhuber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6300290?pdf=render
id doaj-b945c79502f04a009b7ce89344387fbd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b945c79502f04a009b7ce89344387fbd2020-11-24T21:49:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011312e020938310.1371/journal.pone.0209383Payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.Mark A ZezzaMarcus A BachhuberBACKGROUND:While the rise in opioid analgesic prescribing and overdose deaths was multifactorial, financial relationships between opioid drug manufacturers and physicians may be one important factor. METHODS:Using national data from 2013 to 2015, we conducted a retrospective cohort study linking the Open Payments database and Medicare Part D drug utilization data. We created two cohorts of physicians, those receiving opioid-related payments in 2014 and 2015, but not in 2013, and those receiving opioid-related payments in 2015 but not in 2013 and 2014. Our main outcome measures were expenditures on filled prescriptions, daily doses filled, and expenditures per daily dose. For each cohort, we created a comparison group that did not receive an opioid-related payment in any year and was matched on state, specialty, and baseline opioid expenditures. We used a difference-in-differences analysis with linear generalized estimating equations regression models. RESULTS:We identified 6,322 physicians who received opioid-related payments in 2014 and 2015, but not in 2013; they received a mean total of $251. Relative to comparison group physicians, they had a significantly larger increase in mean opioid expenditures ($6,171; 95% CI: 4,997 to 7,346), daily doses dispensed (1,574; 95%CI: 1,330 to 1,818) and mean expenditures per daily dose ($0.38; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.47). We identified 8,669 physicians who received opioid-related payments in 2015, but not in 2013 or 2014; they received a mean total of $40. Relative to comparison physicians, they also had a larger increase in mean opioid expenditures ($1,031; 95% CI: 603 to 1,460), daily doses dispensed (557; 95% CI: 417 to 697), and expenditures per daily dose ($0.06; 95% CI: 0.002 to 0.13). CONCLUSIONS:Our findings add to the growing public policy concern that payments from opioid drug manufacturers can influence physician prescribing. Interventions are needed to reduce such promotional activities or to mitigate their influence.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6300290?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark A Zezza
Marcus A Bachhuber
spellingShingle Mark A Zezza
Marcus A Bachhuber
Payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mark A Zezza
Marcus A Bachhuber
author_sort Mark A Zezza
title Payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.
title_short Payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.
title_full Payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.
title_fullStr Payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.
title_full_unstemmed Payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.
title_sort payments from drug companies to physicians are associated with higher volume and more expensive opioid analgesic prescribing.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description BACKGROUND:While the rise in opioid analgesic prescribing and overdose deaths was multifactorial, financial relationships between opioid drug manufacturers and physicians may be one important factor. METHODS:Using national data from 2013 to 2015, we conducted a retrospective cohort study linking the Open Payments database and Medicare Part D drug utilization data. We created two cohorts of physicians, those receiving opioid-related payments in 2014 and 2015, but not in 2013, and those receiving opioid-related payments in 2015 but not in 2013 and 2014. Our main outcome measures were expenditures on filled prescriptions, daily doses filled, and expenditures per daily dose. For each cohort, we created a comparison group that did not receive an opioid-related payment in any year and was matched on state, specialty, and baseline opioid expenditures. We used a difference-in-differences analysis with linear generalized estimating equations regression models. RESULTS:We identified 6,322 physicians who received opioid-related payments in 2014 and 2015, but not in 2013; they received a mean total of $251. Relative to comparison group physicians, they had a significantly larger increase in mean opioid expenditures ($6,171; 95% CI: 4,997 to 7,346), daily doses dispensed (1,574; 95%CI: 1,330 to 1,818) and mean expenditures per daily dose ($0.38; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.47). We identified 8,669 physicians who received opioid-related payments in 2015, but not in 2013 or 2014; they received a mean total of $40. Relative to comparison physicians, they also had a larger increase in mean opioid expenditures ($1,031; 95% CI: 603 to 1,460), daily doses dispensed (557; 95% CI: 417 to 697), and expenditures per daily dose ($0.06; 95% CI: 0.002 to 0.13). CONCLUSIONS:Our findings add to the growing public policy concern that payments from opioid drug manufacturers can influence physician prescribing. Interventions are needed to reduce such promotional activities or to mitigate their influence.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6300290?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT markazezza paymentsfromdrugcompaniestophysiciansareassociatedwithhighervolumeandmoreexpensiveopioidanalgesicprescribing
AT marcusabachhuber paymentsfromdrugcompaniestophysiciansareassociatedwithhighervolumeandmoreexpensiveopioidanalgesicprescribing
_version_ 1725888873923346432