Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study

Constantine Scordalakes,1 Robert delRosario,2 Andrew Shimer,3 Russell Stankiewicz4 1Women’s Health Care, P.C., Newburgh, IN, 2Partners in Women’s Healthcare, Lemoyne, PA, 3Craig Ranch OB-GYN, McKinney, TX, 4OB-GYN of Evangelical, Lewisburg, PA, USA Objective: Compare amenorrhea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scordalakes C, delRosario R, Shimer A, Stankiewicz R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2018-04-01
Series:International Journal of Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/efficacy-and-patient-satisfaction-after-novasure-and-minerva-endometri-peer-reviewed-article-IJWH
id doaj-b987aa2c5e6f4c008a61b71266e395c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b987aa2c5e6f4c008a61b71266e395c62020-11-25T00:00:28ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of Women's Health1179-14112018-04-01Volume 1013714537850Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative studyScordalakes CdelRosario RShimer AStankiewicz RConstantine Scordalakes,1 Robert delRosario,2 Andrew Shimer,3 Russell Stankiewicz4 1Women’s Health Care, P.C., Newburgh, IN, 2Partners in Women’s Healthcare, Lemoyne, PA, 3Craig Ranch OB-GYN, McKinney, TX, 4OB-GYN of Evangelical, Lewisburg, PA, USA Objective: Compare amenorrhea rate, menstrual symptoms, patient satisfaction, and adverse events in women who underwent endometrial ablation with the NovaSure versus the Minerva radiofrequency ablation systems.Methods: We surveyed 189 premenopausal women (mean 40.8±6.2 years old) who underwent endometrial ablation for abnormal uterine bleeding using the NovaSure (n=97) or Minerva (n=92) systems, at four private US gynecology clinics, and whose procedure date was after July 2015 with follow-up ≥3 months. Women were surveyed an average of 11.3±3.9 months (range 137–532 days) after ablation.Results: The subject-reported amenorrhea rate was 52% higher in NovaSure subjects than Minerva subjects (64% and 42%, respectively; p=0.004). Age and bleeding cyclicity did not affect amenorrhea rate in either group. Normal-to-no bleeding was reported by >90% of subjects after either treatment. NovaSure was significantly more effective than Minerva at reducing pad/tampon use in women with any residual bleeding (2.4±5.2 items/day versus 4.7±5.5 items/day, p=0.049). NovaSure was significantly more effective than Minerva at reducing premenstrual syndrome (PMS) symptoms (p=0.019) and menstrual pain (p=0.003), and more NovaSure subjects (94%) than Minerva subjects (78%) were satisfied with clinical outcomes (p=0.003). Adverse events did not differ by treatment; three women in each group progressed to hysterectomy.Conclusion: While overall bleeding reduction in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding was excellent with either endometrial ablation system, NovaSure treatment resulted in a higher patient-reported 1-year amenorrhea rate, and women with residual bleeding used fewer pads and tampons than Minerva-treated women. Additionally, NovaSure subjects reported better menstrual-related life quality and PMS symptom alleviation, and greater satisfaction with outcomes than Minerva-treated women. Keywords: endometrial ablation, abnormal uterine bleeding, NovaSure, Minerva, premenopausal, satisfactionhttps://www.dovepress.com/efficacy-and-patient-satisfaction-after-novasure-and-minerva-endometri-peer-reviewed-article-IJWHEndometrial ablationAbnormal uterine bleedingNovaSureMinervaPremenopausalSatisfaction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Scordalakes C
delRosario R
Shimer A
Stankiewicz R
spellingShingle Scordalakes C
delRosario R
Shimer A
Stankiewicz R
Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
International Journal of Women's Health
Endometrial ablation
Abnormal uterine bleeding
NovaSure
Minerva
Premenopausal
Satisfaction
author_facet Scordalakes C
delRosario R
Shimer A
Stankiewicz R
author_sort Scordalakes C
title Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
title_short Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
title_full Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
title_sort efficacy and patient satisfaction after novasure and minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
publisher Dove Medical Press
series International Journal of Women's Health
issn 1179-1411
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Constantine Scordalakes,1 Robert delRosario,2 Andrew Shimer,3 Russell Stankiewicz4 1Women’s Health Care, P.C., Newburgh, IN, 2Partners in Women’s Healthcare, Lemoyne, PA, 3Craig Ranch OB-GYN, McKinney, TX, 4OB-GYN of Evangelical, Lewisburg, PA, USA Objective: Compare amenorrhea rate, menstrual symptoms, patient satisfaction, and adverse events in women who underwent endometrial ablation with the NovaSure versus the Minerva radiofrequency ablation systems.Methods: We surveyed 189 premenopausal women (mean 40.8±6.2 years old) who underwent endometrial ablation for abnormal uterine bleeding using the NovaSure (n=97) or Minerva (n=92) systems, at four private US gynecology clinics, and whose procedure date was after July 2015 with follow-up ≥3 months. Women were surveyed an average of 11.3±3.9 months (range 137–532 days) after ablation.Results: The subject-reported amenorrhea rate was 52% higher in NovaSure subjects than Minerva subjects (64% and 42%, respectively; p=0.004). Age and bleeding cyclicity did not affect amenorrhea rate in either group. Normal-to-no bleeding was reported by >90% of subjects after either treatment. NovaSure was significantly more effective than Minerva at reducing pad/tampon use in women with any residual bleeding (2.4±5.2 items/day versus 4.7±5.5 items/day, p=0.049). NovaSure was significantly more effective than Minerva at reducing premenstrual syndrome (PMS) symptoms (p=0.019) and menstrual pain (p=0.003), and more NovaSure subjects (94%) than Minerva subjects (78%) were satisfied with clinical outcomes (p=0.003). Adverse events did not differ by treatment; three women in each group progressed to hysterectomy.Conclusion: While overall bleeding reduction in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding was excellent with either endometrial ablation system, NovaSure treatment resulted in a higher patient-reported 1-year amenorrhea rate, and women with residual bleeding used fewer pads and tampons than Minerva-treated women. Additionally, NovaSure subjects reported better menstrual-related life quality and PMS symptom alleviation, and greater satisfaction with outcomes than Minerva-treated women. Keywords: endometrial ablation, abnormal uterine bleeding, NovaSure, Minerva, premenopausal, satisfaction
topic Endometrial ablation
Abnormal uterine bleeding
NovaSure
Minerva
Premenopausal
Satisfaction
url https://www.dovepress.com/efficacy-and-patient-satisfaction-after-novasure-and-minerva-endometri-peer-reviewed-article-IJWH
work_keys_str_mv AT scordalakesc efficacyandpatientsatisfactionafternovasureandminervaendometrialablationfortreatingabnormaluterinebleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT delrosarior efficacyandpatientsatisfactionafternovasureandminervaendometrialablationfortreatingabnormaluterinebleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT shimera efficacyandpatientsatisfactionafternovasureandminervaendometrialablationfortreatingabnormaluterinebleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT stankiewiczr efficacyandpatientsatisfactionafternovasureandminervaendometrialablationfortreatingabnormaluterinebleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy
_version_ 1725444857368936448