Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study

Aim Resin composite (RC) are commonly used under full crowns. However, independent information is lacking to guide practitioners regarding core RC material selection. This study aimed at comparing the flexural properties of a large selection of commercially-available core build-up RCs (CBU-RC), eith...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Spinhayer, A.T.B. Bui, J.G. Leprince, C.M.F. Hardy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1838283
id doaj-b98c2dc1efe74c21a00605189a953634
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b98c2dc1efe74c21a00605189a9536342021-03-02T16:11:16ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBiomaterial Investigations in Dentistry2641-52752020-01-017115916610.1080/26415275.2020.18382831838283Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative studyL. Spinhayer0A.T.B. Bui1J.G. Leprince2C.M.F. Hardy3School of Dental Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvainSchool of Dental Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvainSchool of Dental Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvainSchool of Dental Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvainAim Resin composite (RC) are commonly used under full crowns. However, independent information is lacking to guide practitioners regarding core RC material selection. This study aimed at comparing the flexural properties of a large selection of commercially-available core build-up RCs (CBU-RC), either light-, self- or dual-cure, to conventional light-cure RCs. Methods RCs were injected into a 25 × 2×2mm Teflon mold, and either light-cured during 20 s (materials with claimed light-cure characteristics) or covered by aluminum during 10 min (dual- and self-cure CBU-RCs). They were subjected after a one-week water storage at 37.5 °C to three-point bending, and Flexural modulus (Eflex) and Flexural Strength (σf) were calculated (n = 20). Thermogravimetric analysis (n = 3) was performed to determine inorganic filler content (%). Results For dual-cure CBU-RCs, both RC (p < .0001) and light-curing (p = .0007) had a significant influence on Eflex, while only RC was significant for σf (p < .0001). Between all conventional RCs and CBU-RCs, significant differences were observed (p < .0001), both regarding Eflex and σf, with values ranging from 3.9 to 15.5 GPa and from 76 to 130.3 MPa, respectively. Higher Eflex values were observed for light-cure RCs than for self- and dual-cure ones, while no clear trend was noticed regarding σf. Good linear correlation was found between inorganic filler content and Eflex (R2=0.85, p < .0001), but not with σf (R2=0.08, p = .1609). Conclusion This work demonstrated a positive influence of light-curing on dual-cure CBU-RC’s Eflex. It also highlighted large differences in flexural properties (especially Eflex) among the investigated materials, questioning the use of some CBU-RCs as dentin replacement in case of large tissue loss.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1838283core build-upresin compositedual cureflexural modulusflexural strength
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. Spinhayer
A.T.B. Bui
J.G. Leprince
C.M.F. Hardy
spellingShingle L. Spinhayer
A.T.B. Bui
J.G. Leprince
C.M.F. Hardy
Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
core build-up
resin composite
dual cure
flexural modulus
flexural strength
author_facet L. Spinhayer
A.T.B. Bui
J.G. Leprince
C.M.F. Hardy
author_sort L. Spinhayer
title Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study
title_short Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study
title_full Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study
title_fullStr Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study
title_sort core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
issn 2641-5275
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Aim Resin composite (RC) are commonly used under full crowns. However, independent information is lacking to guide practitioners regarding core RC material selection. This study aimed at comparing the flexural properties of a large selection of commercially-available core build-up RCs (CBU-RC), either light-, self- or dual-cure, to conventional light-cure RCs. Methods RCs were injected into a 25 × 2×2mm Teflon mold, and either light-cured during 20 s (materials with claimed light-cure characteristics) or covered by aluminum during 10 min (dual- and self-cure CBU-RCs). They were subjected after a one-week water storage at 37.5 °C to three-point bending, and Flexural modulus (Eflex) and Flexural Strength (σf) were calculated (n = 20). Thermogravimetric analysis (n = 3) was performed to determine inorganic filler content (%). Results For dual-cure CBU-RCs, both RC (p < .0001) and light-curing (p = .0007) had a significant influence on Eflex, while only RC was significant for σf (p < .0001). Between all conventional RCs and CBU-RCs, significant differences were observed (p < .0001), both regarding Eflex and σf, with values ranging from 3.9 to 15.5 GPa and from 76 to 130.3 MPa, respectively. Higher Eflex values were observed for light-cure RCs than for self- and dual-cure ones, while no clear trend was noticed regarding σf. Good linear correlation was found between inorganic filler content and Eflex (R2=0.85, p < .0001), but not with σf (R2=0.08, p = .1609). Conclusion This work demonstrated a positive influence of light-curing on dual-cure CBU-RC’s Eflex. It also highlighted large differences in flexural properties (especially Eflex) among the investigated materials, questioning the use of some CBU-RCs as dentin replacement in case of large tissue loss.
topic core build-up
resin composite
dual cure
flexural modulus
flexural strength
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1838283
work_keys_str_mv AT lspinhayer corebuildupresincompositesaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT atbbui corebuildupresincompositesaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT jgleprince corebuildupresincompositesaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT cmfhardy corebuildupresincompositesaninvitrocomparativestudy
_version_ 1724234464077283328