Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”
This paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the resear...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Wollongong
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol6/iss3/8 |
id |
doaj-b999669360a1415cb852ace5e2a090a5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b999669360a1415cb852ace5e2a090a52020-11-24T23:33:13ZengUniversity of WollongongAustralasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal1834-20001834-20192012-09-0163121131Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”Afzalur RashidAnura De ZoysaSudhir LodhKathy RudkinThis paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the research. The authors elucidate issues raised, and in so doing, reproduce the results incorporating the commentator’s suggestions.http://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol6/iss3/8Board compositionindependent directorsfirm performanceBangladesh |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Afzalur Rashid Anura De Zoysa Sudhir Lodh Kathy Rudkin |
spellingShingle |
Afzalur Rashid Anura De Zoysa Sudhir Lodh Kathy Rudkin Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View” Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal Board composition independent directors firm performance Bangladesh |
author_facet |
Afzalur Rashid Anura De Zoysa Sudhir Lodh Kathy Rudkin |
author_sort |
Afzalur Rashid |
title |
Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View” |
title_short |
Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View” |
title_full |
Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View” |
title_fullStr |
Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View” |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View” |
title_sort |
reply to “response: board composition and firm performance: evidence from bangladesh - a sceptical view” |
publisher |
University of Wollongong |
series |
Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal |
issn |
1834-2000 1834-2019 |
publishDate |
2012-09-01 |
description |
This paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the research. The authors elucidate issues raised, and in so doing, reproduce the results incorporating the commentator’s suggestions. |
topic |
Board composition independent directors firm performance Bangladesh |
url |
http://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol6/iss3/8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT afzalurrashid replytoresponseboardcompositionandfirmperformanceevidencefrombangladeshascepticalview AT anuradezoysa replytoresponseboardcompositionandfirmperformanceevidencefrombangladeshascepticalview AT sudhirlodh replytoresponseboardcompositionandfirmperformanceevidencefrombangladeshascepticalview AT kathyrudkin replytoresponseboardcompositionandfirmperformanceevidencefrombangladeshascepticalview |
_version_ |
1725531572184023040 |