Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”

This paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the resear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Afzalur Rashid, Anura De Zoysa, Sudhir Lodh, Kathy Rudkin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Wollongong 2012-09-01
Series:Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol6/iss3/8
id doaj-b999669360a1415cb852ace5e2a090a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b999669360a1415cb852ace5e2a090a52020-11-24T23:33:13ZengUniversity of WollongongAustralasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal1834-20001834-20192012-09-0163121131Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”Afzalur RashidAnura De ZoysaSudhir LodhKathy RudkinThis paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the research. The authors elucidate issues raised, and in so doing, reproduce the results incorporating the commentator’s suggestions.http://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol6/iss3/8Board compositionindependent directorsfirm performanceBangladesh
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Afzalur Rashid
Anura De Zoysa
Sudhir Lodh
Kathy Rudkin
spellingShingle Afzalur Rashid
Anura De Zoysa
Sudhir Lodh
Kathy Rudkin
Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”
Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
Board composition
independent directors
firm performance
Bangladesh
author_facet Afzalur Rashid
Anura De Zoysa
Sudhir Lodh
Kathy Rudkin
author_sort Afzalur Rashid
title Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”
title_short Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”
title_full Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”
title_fullStr Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”
title_full_unstemmed Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”
title_sort reply to “response: board composition and firm performance: evidence from bangladesh - a sceptical view”
publisher University of Wollongong
series Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
issn 1834-2000
1834-2019
publishDate 2012-09-01
description This paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the research. The authors elucidate issues raised, and in so doing, reproduce the results incorporating the commentator’s suggestions.
topic Board composition
independent directors
firm performance
Bangladesh
url http://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol6/iss3/8
work_keys_str_mv AT afzalurrashid replytoresponseboardcompositionandfirmperformanceevidencefrombangladeshascepticalview
AT anuradezoysa replytoresponseboardcompositionandfirmperformanceevidencefrombangladeshascepticalview
AT sudhirlodh replytoresponseboardcompositionandfirmperformanceevidencefrombangladeshascepticalview
AT kathyrudkin replytoresponseboardcompositionandfirmperformanceevidencefrombangladeshascepticalview
_version_ 1725531572184023040