Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses

Abstract Background To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. Methods Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingjing Chen, Youjiao Si, Kaikai Zhao, Xianglong Shi, Weiqun Bi, Shi-en Liu, Hui Hua
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8
id doaj-ba16ebcc30104c7d8126366ded6f1344
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba16ebcc30104c7d8126366ded6f13442020-11-25T03:30:34ZengBMCBMC Medical Imaging1471-23422018-12-011811710.1186/s12880-018-0299-8Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic massesJingjing Chen0Youjiao Si1Kaikai Zhao2Xianglong Shi3Weiqun Bi4Shi-en Liu5Hui Hua6Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Oncology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityAbstract Background To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. Methods Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR before treatment. Mean enhancement time (MET), positive enhancement integral (PEI), a maximum slope of increase (MSI), and a maximum slope of decrease (MSD) were measured. Results There were significant differences between benign and malignant hepatic masses with respect to MET, PEI, and MSI values. The PEI and MSI values between hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), cholangiocarcinomas, and metastatic tumors had significant differences. The MSD value between metastatic tumors, HCCs, and hemangiomas were significantly different. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operator characteristic curves for MET, PEI, and MSI were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The specificity of MET, PEI, and MSI were all 77%, and the sensitivities of MSI was the highest, of which was 82.40%. Logistic regression analysis showed the regression equation to be P = 1/[1 + e0.008 × 1 + 0.007 × 2–6.707], and taking the Youden index maximum points as a diagnostic point was 0.2946. Conclusion Some parameters of MDCE-MRI have significant roles in differentiating hepatic masses.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8Hepatic tumorMagnetic resonance imagingHemangiomaHepatocellular carcinomaCholangiocarcinomaMetastatic tumor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jingjing Chen
Youjiao Si
Kaikai Zhao
Xianglong Shi
Weiqun Bi
Shi-en Liu
Hui Hua
spellingShingle Jingjing Chen
Youjiao Si
Kaikai Zhao
Xianglong Shi
Weiqun Bi
Shi-en Liu
Hui Hua
Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
BMC Medical Imaging
Hepatic tumor
Magnetic resonance imaging
Hemangioma
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Cholangiocarcinoma
Metastatic tumor
author_facet Jingjing Chen
Youjiao Si
Kaikai Zhao
Xianglong Shi
Weiqun Bi
Shi-en Liu
Hui Hua
author_sort Jingjing Chen
title Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_short Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_full Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_fullStr Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_sort evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Imaging
issn 1471-2342
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Abstract Background To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. Methods Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR before treatment. Mean enhancement time (MET), positive enhancement integral (PEI), a maximum slope of increase (MSI), and a maximum slope of decrease (MSD) were measured. Results There were significant differences between benign and malignant hepatic masses with respect to MET, PEI, and MSI values. The PEI and MSI values between hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), cholangiocarcinomas, and metastatic tumors had significant differences. The MSD value between metastatic tumors, HCCs, and hemangiomas were significantly different. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operator characteristic curves for MET, PEI, and MSI were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The specificity of MET, PEI, and MSI were all 77%, and the sensitivities of MSI was the highest, of which was 82.40%. Logistic regression analysis showed the regression equation to be P = 1/[1 + e0.008 × 1 + 0.007 × 2–6.707], and taking the Youden index maximum points as a diagnostic point was 0.2946. Conclusion Some parameters of MDCE-MRI have significant roles in differentiating hepatic masses.
topic Hepatic tumor
Magnetic resonance imaging
Hemangioma
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Cholangiocarcinoma
Metastatic tumor
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jingjingchen evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT youjiaosi evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT kaikaizhao evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT xianglongshi evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT weiqunbi evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT shienliu evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT huihua evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
_version_ 1724574702329921536