Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind
Abstract The numerical simulation based on Reynolds time-averaged equation is one of the approved methods to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of trains in crosswind. However, there are several turbulence models, trains may present different aerodynamic performances in crosswind using different t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10033-019-0402-2 |
id |
doaj-baac841602f546fe99ee0b1e1c3c4463 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-baac841602f546fe99ee0b1e1c3c44632020-11-25T03:39:17ZengSpringerOpenChinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering1000-93452192-82582019-10-0132111210.1186/s10033-019-0402-2Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in CrosswindTian Li0Deng Qin1Jiye Zhang2State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong UniversityState Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong UniversityState Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong UniversityAbstract The numerical simulation based on Reynolds time-averaged equation is one of the approved methods to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of trains in crosswind. However, there are several turbulence models, trains may present different aerodynamic performances in crosswind using different turbulence models. In order to select the most suitable turbulence model, the inter-city express 2 (ICE2) model is chosen as a research object, 6 different turbulence models are used to simulate the flow characteristics, surface pressure and aerodynamic forces of the train in crosswind, respectively. 6 turbulence models are the standard k-ε, Renormalization Group (RNG) k-ε, Realizable k-ε, Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω, standard k-ω and Spalart–Allmaras (SPA), respectively. The numerical results and the wind tunnel experimental data are compared. The results show that the most accurate model for predicting the surface pressure of the train is SST k-ω, followed by Realizable k-ε. Compared with the experimental result, the error of the side force coefficient obtained by SST k-ω and Realizable k-ε turbulence model is less than 1 %. The most accurate prediction for the lift force coefficient is achieved by SST k-ω, followed by RNG k-ε. By comparing 6 different turbulence models, the SST k-ω model is most suitable for the numerical simulation of the aerodynamic behavior of trains in crosswind.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10033-019-0402-2Turbulence modelCrosswindHigh speed trainNumerical simulationAerodynamic |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tian Li Deng Qin Jiye Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Tian Li Deng Qin Jiye Zhang Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Turbulence model Crosswind High speed train Numerical simulation Aerodynamic |
author_facet |
Tian Li Deng Qin Jiye Zhang |
author_sort |
Tian Li |
title |
Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind |
title_short |
Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind |
title_full |
Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind |
title_fullStr |
Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind |
title_sort |
effect of rans turbulence model on aerodynamic behavior of trains in crosswind |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering |
issn |
1000-9345 2192-8258 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Abstract The numerical simulation based on Reynolds time-averaged equation is one of the approved methods to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of trains in crosswind. However, there are several turbulence models, trains may present different aerodynamic performances in crosswind using different turbulence models. In order to select the most suitable turbulence model, the inter-city express 2 (ICE2) model is chosen as a research object, 6 different turbulence models are used to simulate the flow characteristics, surface pressure and aerodynamic forces of the train in crosswind, respectively. 6 turbulence models are the standard k-ε, Renormalization Group (RNG) k-ε, Realizable k-ε, Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω, standard k-ω and Spalart–Allmaras (SPA), respectively. The numerical results and the wind tunnel experimental data are compared. The results show that the most accurate model for predicting the surface pressure of the train is SST k-ω, followed by Realizable k-ε. Compared with the experimental result, the error of the side force coefficient obtained by SST k-ω and Realizable k-ε turbulence model is less than 1 %. The most accurate prediction for the lift force coefficient is achieved by SST k-ω, followed by RNG k-ε. By comparing 6 different turbulence models, the SST k-ω model is most suitable for the numerical simulation of the aerodynamic behavior of trains in crosswind. |
topic |
Turbulence model Crosswind High speed train Numerical simulation Aerodynamic |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10033-019-0402-2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tianli effectofransturbulencemodelonaerodynamicbehavioroftrainsincrosswind AT dengqin effectofransturbulencemodelonaerodynamicbehavioroftrainsincrosswind AT jiyezhang effectofransturbulencemodelonaerodynamicbehavioroftrainsincrosswind |
_version_ |
1724539903373475840 |