Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research

Challenges of governance often constitute critical obstacles to efforts to equitably improve livelihoods in social-ecological systems. Yet, just as often, these challenges go unspoken, or are viewed as fixed parts of the context, beyond the scope of influence of agricultural, development, or natural...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Marina. Apgar, Philippa J. Cohen, Blake D. Ratner, Sanjiv de Silva, Marie-Charlotte Buisson, Catherine Longley, Ram C. Bastakoti, Everisto Mapedza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2017-03-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss1/art9/
id doaj-baf88f7be76b43e78ec9692083c67399
record_format Article
spelling doaj-baf88f7be76b43e78ec9692083c673992020-11-24T21:02:06ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872017-03-01221910.5751/ES-08929-2201098929Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action researchJ. Marina. Apgar0Philippa J. Cohen1Blake D. Ratner2Sanjiv de Silva3Marie-Charlotte Buisson4Catherine Longley5Ram C. Bastakoti6Everisto Mapedza7formerly WorldFish, Penang, MalaysiaWorldFish, Honiara, Solomon IslandsWorldFish, Penang, MalaysiaInternational Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri LankaInternational Water Management Institute, New-Delhi, Indiaformerly WorldFish, Lusaka, ZambiaInternational Water Management Institute, Kathmandu, NepalInternational Water Management Institute, Pretoria, South AfricaChallenges of governance often constitute critical obstacles to efforts to equitably improve livelihoods in social-ecological systems. Yet, just as often, these challenges go unspoken, or are viewed as fixed parts of the context, beyond the scope of influence of agricultural, development, or natural resource management initiatives. What does it take to get governance obstacles and opportunities out in the open, creating the space for constructive dialogue and collective action that can help to address them? We respond to this question by comparing experiences of participatory action research (PAR) in coastal and floodplain systems in four countries (Zambia, Solomon Islands, Bangladesh, and Cambodia) with a focus on understanding how to build more equitable governance arrangements. We found that governance improvement was often an implicit or secondary objective of initiatives that initially sought to address more technical natural resource or livelihood-related development challenges. We argue that using PAR principles of ownership, equity, shared analysis, and feedback built trust and helped to identify and act upon opportunities to address more difficult-to-shift dimensions of governance particularly in terms of stakeholder representation, distribution of authority, and accountability. Our findings suggest that the engaged and embedded approach of researcher-facilitators can help move from identifying opportunities for governance change to supporting stakeholders as they build more equitable governance arrangements.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss1/art9/aquatic agricultural systemsequityfacilitationgovernanceparticipatory action researchrepresentationtransformation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Marina. Apgar
Philippa J. Cohen
Blake D. Ratner
Sanjiv de Silva
Marie-Charlotte Buisson
Catherine Longley
Ram C. Bastakoti
Everisto Mapedza
spellingShingle J. Marina. Apgar
Philippa J. Cohen
Blake D. Ratner
Sanjiv de Silva
Marie-Charlotte Buisson
Catherine Longley
Ram C. Bastakoti
Everisto Mapedza
Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
Ecology and Society
aquatic agricultural systems
equity
facilitation
governance
participatory action research
representation
transformation
author_facet J. Marina. Apgar
Philippa J. Cohen
Blake D. Ratner
Sanjiv de Silva
Marie-Charlotte Buisson
Catherine Longley
Ram C. Bastakoti
Everisto Mapedza
author_sort J. Marina. Apgar
title Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
title_short Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
title_full Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
title_fullStr Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
title_full_unstemmed Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
title_sort identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Challenges of governance often constitute critical obstacles to efforts to equitably improve livelihoods in social-ecological systems. Yet, just as often, these challenges go unspoken, or are viewed as fixed parts of the context, beyond the scope of influence of agricultural, development, or natural resource management initiatives. What does it take to get governance obstacles and opportunities out in the open, creating the space for constructive dialogue and collective action that can help to address them? We respond to this question by comparing experiences of participatory action research (PAR) in coastal and floodplain systems in four countries (Zambia, Solomon Islands, Bangladesh, and Cambodia) with a focus on understanding how to build more equitable governance arrangements. We found that governance improvement was often an implicit or secondary objective of initiatives that initially sought to address more technical natural resource or livelihood-related development challenges. We argue that using PAR principles of ownership, equity, shared analysis, and feedback built trust and helped to identify and act upon opportunities to address more difficult-to-shift dimensions of governance particularly in terms of stakeholder representation, distribution of authority, and accountability. Our findings suggest that the engaged and embedded approach of researcher-facilitators can help move from identifying opportunities for governance change to supporting stakeholders as they build more equitable governance arrangements.
topic aquatic agricultural systems
equity
facilitation
governance
participatory action research
representation
transformation
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss1/art9/
work_keys_str_mv AT jmarinaapgar identifyingopportunitiestoimprovegovernanceofaquaticagriculturalsystemsthroughparticipatoryactionresearch
AT philippajcohen identifyingopportunitiestoimprovegovernanceofaquaticagriculturalsystemsthroughparticipatoryactionresearch
AT blakedratner identifyingopportunitiestoimprovegovernanceofaquaticagriculturalsystemsthroughparticipatoryactionresearch
AT sanjivdesilva identifyingopportunitiestoimprovegovernanceofaquaticagriculturalsystemsthroughparticipatoryactionresearch
AT mariecharlottebuisson identifyingopportunitiestoimprovegovernanceofaquaticagriculturalsystemsthroughparticipatoryactionresearch
AT catherinelongley identifyingopportunitiestoimprovegovernanceofaquaticagriculturalsystemsthroughparticipatoryactionresearch
AT ramcbastakoti identifyingopportunitiestoimprovegovernanceofaquaticagriculturalsystemsthroughparticipatoryactionresearch
AT everistomapedza identifyingopportunitiestoimprovegovernanceofaquaticagriculturalsystemsthroughparticipatoryactionresearch
_version_ 1716776495309914112