Arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomes

Abstract Background Primary purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic arthrolysis in posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness. Secondary aims are to compare the level of satisfaction and complications. Methods We retrospectively evaluated th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saroj Rai, Qimin Zhang, Nira Tamang, Shengyang Jin, Hong Wang, Chunqing Meng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2666-1
id doaj-bafc74ee221f4f7c93e9165aaa2eea56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bafc74ee221f4f7c93e9165aaa2eea562020-11-25T03:37:41ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742019-06-012011810.1186/s12891-019-2666-1Arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomesSaroj Rai0Qimin Zhang1Nira Tamang2Shengyang Jin3Hong Wang4Chunqing Meng5Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologySchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background Primary purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic arthrolysis in posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness. Secondary aims are to compare the level of satisfaction and complications. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the patients undergoing arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis between January 2008 and September 2015 and have completed a minimum 2-year follow-up. Total of 141 patients (male = 90; female = 51) with 143 elbows (posttraumatic, n = 75; non-traumatic, n = 68) with an average age of 33 years were available for final evaluation. The average follow-up period was 44 months. We used the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, range of motion (ROM), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure clinical outcomes. The level of satisfaction was measured by a self-constructed questionnaire. Results All parameters were significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.01). However, statistically significant differences were not present in the rate of postoperative improvement of elbow ROM (P = 0.08) and MEPI (P = 0.21) in both groups. According to MEPI, 72(96%) elbows in posttraumatic and 60(88%) elbows in non-traumatic group were rated as good to excellent. No statistically significant differences were observed in the level of satisfaction (P = 0.76) and rate of complications (P = 0.91). Conclusions Arthroscopic arthrolysis is an effective tool and a good option for the treatment of patients with posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness. The rate of elbow ROM and MEPI score improvements were significant and comparable postoperatively with a high level of patient’s satisfaction. However, postoperative rehabilitation is equally essential to maintain intraoperative elbow ROM, to attain optimal outcome and to prevent complications.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2666-1ArthroscopicArthrolysisElbowStiffnessPosttraumaticNon-traumatic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saroj Rai
Qimin Zhang
Nira Tamang
Shengyang Jin
Hong Wang
Chunqing Meng
spellingShingle Saroj Rai
Qimin Zhang
Nira Tamang
Shengyang Jin
Hong Wang
Chunqing Meng
Arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomes
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Arthroscopic
Arthrolysis
Elbow
Stiffness
Posttraumatic
Non-traumatic
author_facet Saroj Rai
Qimin Zhang
Nira Tamang
Shengyang Jin
Hong Wang
Chunqing Meng
author_sort Saroj Rai
title Arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomes
title_short Arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomes
title_full Arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomes
title_fullStr Arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomes
title_sort arthroscopic arthrolysis of posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness offers comparable clinical outcomes
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Primary purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic arthrolysis in posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness. Secondary aims are to compare the level of satisfaction and complications. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the patients undergoing arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis between January 2008 and September 2015 and have completed a minimum 2-year follow-up. Total of 141 patients (male = 90; female = 51) with 143 elbows (posttraumatic, n = 75; non-traumatic, n = 68) with an average age of 33 years were available for final evaluation. The average follow-up period was 44 months. We used the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, range of motion (ROM), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure clinical outcomes. The level of satisfaction was measured by a self-constructed questionnaire. Results All parameters were significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.01). However, statistically significant differences were not present in the rate of postoperative improvement of elbow ROM (P = 0.08) and MEPI (P = 0.21) in both groups. According to MEPI, 72(96%) elbows in posttraumatic and 60(88%) elbows in non-traumatic group were rated as good to excellent. No statistically significant differences were observed in the level of satisfaction (P = 0.76) and rate of complications (P = 0.91). Conclusions Arthroscopic arthrolysis is an effective tool and a good option for the treatment of patients with posttraumatic and non-traumatic elbow stiffness. The rate of elbow ROM and MEPI score improvements were significant and comparable postoperatively with a high level of patient’s satisfaction. However, postoperative rehabilitation is equally essential to maintain intraoperative elbow ROM, to attain optimal outcome and to prevent complications.
topic Arthroscopic
Arthrolysis
Elbow
Stiffness
Posttraumatic
Non-traumatic
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2666-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sarojrai arthroscopicarthrolysisofposttraumaticandnontraumaticelbowstiffnessofferscomparableclinicaloutcomes
AT qiminzhang arthroscopicarthrolysisofposttraumaticandnontraumaticelbowstiffnessofferscomparableclinicaloutcomes
AT niratamang arthroscopicarthrolysisofposttraumaticandnontraumaticelbowstiffnessofferscomparableclinicaloutcomes
AT shengyangjin arthroscopicarthrolysisofposttraumaticandnontraumaticelbowstiffnessofferscomparableclinicaloutcomes
AT hongwang arthroscopicarthrolysisofposttraumaticandnontraumaticelbowstiffnessofferscomparableclinicaloutcomes
AT chunqingmeng arthroscopicarthrolysisofposttraumaticandnontraumaticelbowstiffnessofferscomparableclinicaloutcomes
_version_ 1724544534769041408