The semantics and pragmatics of plurals

This paper addresses the semantics and pragmatics of singular and plural nominals in languages that manifest a binary morphological number distinction within this category. We review the main challenges such an account has to meet, and develop an analysis which treats the plural morpheme as semantic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henriëtte de Swart, Donka Farkas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linguistic Society of America 2010-03-01
Series:Semantics and Pragmatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://semprag.org/article/view/130
id doaj-bb1c735adcfa4758ae99a2cad819a456
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb1c735adcfa4758ae99a2cad819a4562020-11-24T21:11:50ZengLinguistic Society of AmericaSemantics and Pragmatics1937-89122010-03-013015410.3765/sp.3.6545The semantics and pragmatics of pluralsHenriëtte de SwartDonka FarkasThis paper addresses the semantics and pragmatics of singular and plural nominals in languages that manifest a binary morphological number distinction within this category. We review the main challenges such an account has to meet, and develop an analysis which treats the plural morpheme as semantically relevant, and the singular form as not contributing any number restriction on its own but acquiring one when in competition with the plural form. The competition between singular and plural nominals is grounded in bidirectional optimization over form-meaning pairs. The main conceptual advantage our proposal has over recent alternative accounts is that it respects Horn's 'division of pragmatic labor', in that it treats morphologically marked forms as semantically marked, and morphologically unmarked forms as semantically unmarked. In our account, plural forms are polysemous between an exclusive plural sense, which enforces sum reference, and an inclusive sense, which allows both atoms and sums as possible witnesses. The analysis predicts that a plural form is pragmatically appropriate only in case sum values are among the intended referents. To account for the choice between these two senses in context we invoke the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis, an independently motivated pragmatic principle. Finally, we show how the approach we develop explains some puzzling contrasts in number marking between English "three/more children" and Hungarian "három/több gyerek" ('three/more child'), a problem that has not been properly accounted for in the literature so far. doi:10.3765/sp.3.6 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/farkas-deswart10.bib">BibTeX info</a>http://semprag.org/article/view/130singular, plural, morphology, semantics, pragmatics, markedness, optimality theory, strongest meaning hypothesis, Hungarian
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henriëtte de Swart
Donka Farkas
spellingShingle Henriëtte de Swart
Donka Farkas
The semantics and pragmatics of plurals
Semantics and Pragmatics
singular, plural, morphology, semantics, pragmatics, markedness, optimality theory, strongest meaning hypothesis, Hungarian
author_facet Henriëtte de Swart
Donka Farkas
author_sort Henriëtte de Swart
title The semantics and pragmatics of plurals
title_short The semantics and pragmatics of plurals
title_full The semantics and pragmatics of plurals
title_fullStr The semantics and pragmatics of plurals
title_full_unstemmed The semantics and pragmatics of plurals
title_sort semantics and pragmatics of plurals
publisher Linguistic Society of America
series Semantics and Pragmatics
issn 1937-8912
publishDate 2010-03-01
description This paper addresses the semantics and pragmatics of singular and plural nominals in languages that manifest a binary morphological number distinction within this category. We review the main challenges such an account has to meet, and develop an analysis which treats the plural morpheme as semantically relevant, and the singular form as not contributing any number restriction on its own but acquiring one when in competition with the plural form. The competition between singular and plural nominals is grounded in bidirectional optimization over form-meaning pairs. The main conceptual advantage our proposal has over recent alternative accounts is that it respects Horn's 'division of pragmatic labor', in that it treats morphologically marked forms as semantically marked, and morphologically unmarked forms as semantically unmarked. In our account, plural forms are polysemous between an exclusive plural sense, which enforces sum reference, and an inclusive sense, which allows both atoms and sums as possible witnesses. The analysis predicts that a plural form is pragmatically appropriate only in case sum values are among the intended referents. To account for the choice between these two senses in context we invoke the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis, an independently motivated pragmatic principle. Finally, we show how the approach we develop explains some puzzling contrasts in number marking between English "three/more children" and Hungarian "három/több gyerek" ('three/more child'), a problem that has not been properly accounted for in the literature so far. doi:10.3765/sp.3.6 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/farkas-deswart10.bib">BibTeX info</a>
topic singular, plural, morphology, semantics, pragmatics, markedness, optimality theory, strongest meaning hypothesis, Hungarian
url http://semprag.org/article/view/130
work_keys_str_mv AT henriettedeswart thesemanticsandpragmaticsofplurals
AT donkafarkas thesemanticsandpragmaticsofplurals
AT henriettedeswart semanticsandpragmaticsofplurals
AT donkafarkas semanticsandpragmaticsofplurals
_version_ 1716752581925011456