Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis

This meta-analysis paper describes the analysis of observational clinical studies on the treatment of refractory epilepsy with cannabidiol (CBD)-based products. Beyond attempting to establish the safety and efficacy of such products, we also investigated if there is enough evidence to assume any dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabricio A. Pamplona, Lorenzo Rolim da Silva, Ana Carolina Coan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2018.00759/full
id doaj-bb2a3e0de3314484abde4df89945ef91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb2a3e0de3314484abde4df89945ef912020-11-25T00:21:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952018-09-01910.3389/fneur.2018.00759392084Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysisFabricio A. Pamplona0Lorenzo Rolim da Silva1Ana Carolina Coan2Entourage Phytolab, São Paulo, BrazilBedrocan Brasil, São Paulo, BrazilUNICAMP, Campinas, BrazilThis meta-analysis paper describes the analysis of observational clinical studies on the treatment of refractory epilepsy with cannabidiol (CBD)-based products. Beyond attempting to establish the safety and efficacy of such products, we also investigated if there is enough evidence to assume any difference in efficacy between CBD-rich extracts compared to purified CBD products. The systematic search took place in February/2017 and updated in December/2017 using the keywords “epilepsy” or “Dravet” or “Lennox-Gastaut” or “CDKL5” combined with “Cannabis,” “cannabinoid,” “cannabidiol,” or “CBD” resulting in 199 papers. The qualitative assessment resulted in 11 valid references, with an average impact factor of 8.1 (ranging from 1.4 to 47.8). The categorical data of a total of 670 patients were analyzed by Fischer test. The average daily dose ranged between 1 and 50 mg/kg, with treatment length from 3 to 12 months (mean 6.2 months). Two thirds of patients reported improvement in the frequency of seizures (399/622, 64%). There were more reports of improvement from patients treated with CBD-rich extracts (318/447, 71%) than patients treated with purified CBD (81/175, 46%), with statistical significance (p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, when the standard clinical threshold of a “50% reduction or more in the frequency of seizures” was applied, only 39% of the individuals were considered “responders,” and there was no difference (p = 0.52) between treatments with CBD-rich extracts (122/330, 37%) and purified CBD (94/223, 42%). Patients treated with CBD-rich extracts reported lower average dose (6.0 mg/kg/day) than those using purified CBD (25.3 mg/kg/day). The reports of mild (158/216, 76% vs. 148/447, 33%, p < 0.001) and severe (41/155, 26% vs. 23/328, 7%, p < 0.0001) adverse effects were more frequent in products containing purified CBD than in CBD-rich extracts. CBD-rich extracts seem to present a better therapeutic profile than purified CBD, at least in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy. The roots of this difference is likely due to synergistic effects of CBD with other phytocompounds (aka Entourage effect), but this remains to be confirmed in controlled clinical studies.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2018.00759/fullcannabinoidscannabidiol (CBD)epilepsymeta-analysisrefractory epilepsyphytotherapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabricio A. Pamplona
Lorenzo Rolim da Silva
Ana Carolina Coan
spellingShingle Fabricio A. Pamplona
Lorenzo Rolim da Silva
Ana Carolina Coan
Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis
Frontiers in Neurology
cannabinoids
cannabidiol (CBD)
epilepsy
meta-analysis
refractory epilepsy
phytotherapy
author_facet Fabricio A. Pamplona
Lorenzo Rolim da Silva
Ana Carolina Coan
author_sort Fabricio A. Pamplona
title Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis
title_short Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis
title_full Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis
title_sort potential clinical benefits of cbd-rich cannabis extracts over purified cbd in treatment-resistant epilepsy: observational data meta-analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2018-09-01
description This meta-analysis paper describes the analysis of observational clinical studies on the treatment of refractory epilepsy with cannabidiol (CBD)-based products. Beyond attempting to establish the safety and efficacy of such products, we also investigated if there is enough evidence to assume any difference in efficacy between CBD-rich extracts compared to purified CBD products. The systematic search took place in February/2017 and updated in December/2017 using the keywords “epilepsy” or “Dravet” or “Lennox-Gastaut” or “CDKL5” combined with “Cannabis,” “cannabinoid,” “cannabidiol,” or “CBD” resulting in 199 papers. The qualitative assessment resulted in 11 valid references, with an average impact factor of 8.1 (ranging from 1.4 to 47.8). The categorical data of a total of 670 patients were analyzed by Fischer test. The average daily dose ranged between 1 and 50 mg/kg, with treatment length from 3 to 12 months (mean 6.2 months). Two thirds of patients reported improvement in the frequency of seizures (399/622, 64%). There were more reports of improvement from patients treated with CBD-rich extracts (318/447, 71%) than patients treated with purified CBD (81/175, 46%), with statistical significance (p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, when the standard clinical threshold of a “50% reduction or more in the frequency of seizures” was applied, only 39% of the individuals were considered “responders,” and there was no difference (p = 0.52) between treatments with CBD-rich extracts (122/330, 37%) and purified CBD (94/223, 42%). Patients treated with CBD-rich extracts reported lower average dose (6.0 mg/kg/day) than those using purified CBD (25.3 mg/kg/day). The reports of mild (158/216, 76% vs. 148/447, 33%, p < 0.001) and severe (41/155, 26% vs. 23/328, 7%, p < 0.0001) adverse effects were more frequent in products containing purified CBD than in CBD-rich extracts. CBD-rich extracts seem to present a better therapeutic profile than purified CBD, at least in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy. The roots of this difference is likely due to synergistic effects of CBD with other phytocompounds (aka Entourage effect), but this remains to be confirmed in controlled clinical studies.
topic cannabinoids
cannabidiol (CBD)
epilepsy
meta-analysis
refractory epilepsy
phytotherapy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2018.00759/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fabricioapamplona potentialclinicalbenefitsofcbdrichcannabisextractsoverpurifiedcbdintreatmentresistantepilepsyobservationaldatametaanalysis
AT lorenzorolimdasilva potentialclinicalbenefitsofcbdrichcannabisextractsoverpurifiedcbdintreatmentresistantepilepsyobservationaldatametaanalysis
AT anacarolinacoan potentialclinicalbenefitsofcbdrichcannabisextractsoverpurifiedcbdintreatmentresistantepilepsyobservationaldatametaanalysis
_version_ 1725362274069118976