Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics

Argentina was the first country that enacted regulatory criteria to assess if organisms resulting from new breeding techniques (NBTs) are to be regarded as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or not. The country has now accumulated 4 year of experience applying such criteria, reaching a considerab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agustina I. Whelan, Patricia Gutti, Martin A. Lema
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00303/full
id doaj-bb2a7805d574426e86e9e3b9ce092c55
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb2a7805d574426e86e9e3b9ce092c552020-11-25T02:29:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852020-04-01810.3389/fbioe.2020.00303525237Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation EconomicsAgustina I. Whelan0Agustina I. Whelan1Patricia Gutti2Patricia Gutti3Martin A. Lema4Martin A. Lema5Maestría en Política y Gestión de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDirección de Biotecnología, Secretaría de Alimentos y Bioeconomía, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaMaestría en Política y Gestión de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDepartamento de Ciencia y Tecnología & Maestría en Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Bernal, ArgentinaDirección de Biotecnología, Secretaría de Alimentos y Bioeconomía, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDepartamento de Ciencia y Tecnología & Maestría en Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Bernal, ArgentinaArgentina was the first country that enacted regulatory criteria to assess if organisms resulting from new breeding techniques (NBTs) are to be regarded as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or not. The country has now accumulated 4 year of experience applying such criteria, reaching a considerable number of cases, composed mostly of gene-edited plants, animals, and microorganisms of agricultural use. This article explores the effects on economic innovation of such regulatory experience. This is done by comparing the cases of products derived from gene editing and other NBTs that have been presented to the regulatory system, against the cases of GMOs that have been deregulated in the country. Albeit preliminary, this analysis suggests that products from gene editing will have different profiles and market release rates compared with the first wave of products from the so called “modern biotechnology.” Gene editing products seems to follow a much faster development rate from bench to market. Such development is driven by a more diverse group of developers, and led mostly by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and public research institutions. In addition, product profiles are also more diversified in terms of traits and organisms. The inferences of these findings for the agricultural and biotechnology sectors, particularly in developing countries, are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00303/fullgene editinginnovation economybiotechnology regulationbioeconomygenome editingCRISPR-CAS
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agustina I. Whelan
Agustina I. Whelan
Patricia Gutti
Patricia Gutti
Martin A. Lema
Martin A. Lema
spellingShingle Agustina I. Whelan
Agustina I. Whelan
Patricia Gutti
Patricia Gutti
Martin A. Lema
Martin A. Lema
Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
gene editing
innovation economy
biotechnology regulation
bioeconomy
genome editing
CRISPR-CAS
author_facet Agustina I. Whelan
Agustina I. Whelan
Patricia Gutti
Patricia Gutti
Martin A. Lema
Martin A. Lema
author_sort Agustina I. Whelan
title Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics
title_short Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics
title_full Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics
title_fullStr Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics
title_full_unstemmed Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics
title_sort gene editing regulation and innovation economics
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
issn 2296-4185
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Argentina was the first country that enacted regulatory criteria to assess if organisms resulting from new breeding techniques (NBTs) are to be regarded as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or not. The country has now accumulated 4 year of experience applying such criteria, reaching a considerable number of cases, composed mostly of gene-edited plants, animals, and microorganisms of agricultural use. This article explores the effects on economic innovation of such regulatory experience. This is done by comparing the cases of products derived from gene editing and other NBTs that have been presented to the regulatory system, against the cases of GMOs that have been deregulated in the country. Albeit preliminary, this analysis suggests that products from gene editing will have different profiles and market release rates compared with the first wave of products from the so called “modern biotechnology.” Gene editing products seems to follow a much faster development rate from bench to market. Such development is driven by a more diverse group of developers, and led mostly by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and public research institutions. In addition, product profiles are also more diversified in terms of traits and organisms. The inferences of these findings for the agricultural and biotechnology sectors, particularly in developing countries, are discussed.
topic gene editing
innovation economy
biotechnology regulation
bioeconomy
genome editing
CRISPR-CAS
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00303/full
work_keys_str_mv AT agustinaiwhelan geneeditingregulationandinnovationeconomics
AT agustinaiwhelan geneeditingregulationandinnovationeconomics
AT patriciagutti geneeditingregulationandinnovationeconomics
AT patriciagutti geneeditingregulationandinnovationeconomics
AT martinalema geneeditingregulationandinnovationeconomics
AT martinalema geneeditingregulationandinnovationeconomics
_version_ 1724830550370287616