Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC data

Measurements of proton and nuclear collisions at the Large Hadron Collider at nucleon-nucleon c.m. energies up to SNN=13 TeV$ \sqrt {S_{NN} } = 13\,{\rm{TeV}} $ have improved our understanding of hadronic interactions at the highest energies reached in collisions of cosmic rays with nuclei in the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: d’Enterria David
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2019/15/epjconf_uhecr18_02005.pdf
id doaj-bb2dbcf3d0d347b19aeafe931e256308
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb2dbcf3d0d347b19aeafe931e2563082021-08-02T06:15:37ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2019-01-012100200510.1051/epjconf/201921002005epjconf_uhecr18_02005Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC datad’Enterria David0CERN, EP DepartmentMeasurements of proton and nuclear collisions at the Large Hadron Collider at nucleon-nucleon c.m. energies up to SNN=13 TeV$ \sqrt {S_{NN} } = 13\,{\rm{TeV}} $ have improved our understanding of hadronic interactions at the highest energies reached in collisions of cosmic rays with nuclei in the earth atmosphere, up to sNN$ \sqrt {S_{NN} } $ ≈ 450 TeV. The Monte Carlo event generators (epos, qgsjet, and sibyll) commonly used to describe the air showers generated by ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECR, with ECR ≈ 1017-1020 eV) feature now, after parameter retuning based on LHC Run-I data, more consistent predictions on the nature of the cosmic rays at the tail of the measured spectrum. However, anomalies persist in the data that cannot be accommodated by the models. Among others, the total number of muons (as well as their maximum production depth) remains significantly underestimated (overestimated) by all models. Comparisons of epos, qgsjet, and sibyll predictions to the latest LHC data, and to collider MC generators such as pythia, indicate that improved description of hard multiple minijet production and nuclear effects may help reduce part of the data-model discrepancies, shed light on the UHECR composition approaching the observed ECR ≈ 1020 eV cutoff, and uncover any potential new physics responsible for the observed anomalies.https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2019/15/epjconf_uhecr18_02005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author d’Enterria David
spellingShingle d’Enterria David
Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC data
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet d’Enterria David
author_sort d’Enterria David
title Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC data
title_short Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC data
title_full Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC data
title_fullStr Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC data
title_full_unstemmed Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC data
title_sort ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: anomalies, qcd, and lhc data
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Measurements of proton and nuclear collisions at the Large Hadron Collider at nucleon-nucleon c.m. energies up to SNN=13 TeV$ \sqrt {S_{NN} } = 13\,{\rm{TeV}} $ have improved our understanding of hadronic interactions at the highest energies reached in collisions of cosmic rays with nuclei in the earth atmosphere, up to sNN$ \sqrt {S_{NN} } $ ≈ 450 TeV. The Monte Carlo event generators (epos, qgsjet, and sibyll) commonly used to describe the air showers generated by ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECR, with ECR ≈ 1017-1020 eV) feature now, after parameter retuning based on LHC Run-I data, more consistent predictions on the nature of the cosmic rays at the tail of the measured spectrum. However, anomalies persist in the data that cannot be accommodated by the models. Among others, the total number of muons (as well as their maximum production depth) remains significantly underestimated (overestimated) by all models. Comparisons of epos, qgsjet, and sibyll predictions to the latest LHC data, and to collider MC generators such as pythia, indicate that improved description of hard multiple minijet production and nuclear effects may help reduce part of the data-model discrepancies, shed light on the UHECR composition approaching the observed ECR ≈ 1020 eV cutoff, and uncover any potential new physics responsible for the observed anomalies.
url https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2019/15/epjconf_uhecr18_02005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT denterriadavid ultrahighenergycosmicraysanomaliesqcdandlhcdata
_version_ 1721240434313789440