Retrospeksi Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kemiskinan di Pedesaan

Using a political-economy model of analysis introduced by Uphoff and Ilchman (1972), the writer tries to analyze the "aggregate optimality" of dePelopment programmes aimed at combating poverty in Indonesia. Other than the macro analysis of development political-economy, the four micro anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Victor A Hamel
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2015-12-01
Series:JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/8473
id doaj-bb2dc5a054b64bdfb34d778b65601bd1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb2dc5a054b64bdfb34d778b65601bd12020-11-25T01:09:25ZindUniversitas Gadjah MadaJKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)0852-92132477-46932015-12-0132112610.22146/jkap.84737034Retrospeksi Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kemiskinan di PedesaanVictor A HamelUsing a political-economy model of analysis introduced by Uphoff and Ilchman (1972), the writer tries to analyze the "aggregate optimality" of dePelopment programmes aimed at combating poverty in Indonesia. Other than the macro analysis of development political-economy, the four micro analysis or criteria of aggregate optimality are used to evaluate the effectiveness of development programmes for the poor: market integration, assets or production factors' transfer, organisational or institutional building, and enterpreneurship improvement. Then, a retrospective evaluation is applied to some development programmes implemented during the New Order regime in Indonesia, the Bimas (Mass Guidance) programme, PKT (Integrated Regional Development) programme, PIR (Nucleic People Plantation Project), and the Inpres (Presidential Instruction) programme. It is found out from this assessment that all of the development programmes have not really able to alleviate the incidence of poverty in the regions. The Bimas, PKT, PIR and Inpress were not designed as direct attack to poverty issues and hence could not substantially improve productivity among the poor. In the process of implementation, these programme have been oriented more to economic growth and formal sectors rather than the poor people economy. The worse thing was that the programmes have created poor people dependency in terms of economic as well as political resources.https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/8473political-economydevelopment programmepoverty allevation
collection DOAJ
language Indonesian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Victor A Hamel
spellingShingle Victor A Hamel
Retrospeksi Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kemiskinan di Pedesaan
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
political-economy
development programme
poverty allevation
author_facet Victor A Hamel
author_sort Victor A Hamel
title Retrospeksi Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kemiskinan di Pedesaan
title_short Retrospeksi Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kemiskinan di Pedesaan
title_full Retrospeksi Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kemiskinan di Pedesaan
title_fullStr Retrospeksi Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kemiskinan di Pedesaan
title_full_unstemmed Retrospeksi Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Kemiskinan di Pedesaan
title_sort retrospeksi ekonomi-politik kebijakan pemberantasan kemiskinan di pedesaan
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
series JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
issn 0852-9213
2477-4693
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Using a political-economy model of analysis introduced by Uphoff and Ilchman (1972), the writer tries to analyze the "aggregate optimality" of dePelopment programmes aimed at combating poverty in Indonesia. Other than the macro analysis of development political-economy, the four micro analysis or criteria of aggregate optimality are used to evaluate the effectiveness of development programmes for the poor: market integration, assets or production factors' transfer, organisational or institutional building, and enterpreneurship improvement. Then, a retrospective evaluation is applied to some development programmes implemented during the New Order regime in Indonesia, the Bimas (Mass Guidance) programme, PKT (Integrated Regional Development) programme, PIR (Nucleic People Plantation Project), and the Inpres (Presidential Instruction) programme. It is found out from this assessment that all of the development programmes have not really able to alleviate the incidence of poverty in the regions. The Bimas, PKT, PIR and Inpress were not designed as direct attack to poverty issues and hence could not substantially improve productivity among the poor. In the process of implementation, these programme have been oriented more to economic growth and formal sectors rather than the poor people economy. The worse thing was that the programmes have created poor people dependency in terms of economic as well as political resources.
topic political-economy
development programme
poverty allevation
url https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/8473
work_keys_str_mv AT victorahamel retrospeksiekonomipolitikkebijakanpemberantasankemiskinandipedesaan
_version_ 1725178947655696384