Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter

<p>Real-time, in situ molecular composition measurements of the organic fraction of fine particulate matter (PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>) remain challenging, hindering a full understanding of the climate impacts and health effects of P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Qi, M. Chen, G. Stefenelli, V. Pospisilova, Y. Tong, A. Bertrand, C. Hueglin, X. Ge, U. Baltensperger, A. S. H. Prévôt, J. G. Slowik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-06-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8037/2019/acp-19-8037-2019.pdf
id doaj-bb641eeb3bc04ab3849d39d43a46595e
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. Qi
L. Qi
M. Chen
G. Stefenelli
V. Pospisilova
Y. Tong
A. Bertrand
C. Hueglin
X. Ge
U. Baltensperger
A. S. H. Prévôt
J. G. Slowik
spellingShingle L. Qi
L. Qi
M. Chen
G. Stefenelli
V. Pospisilova
Y. Tong
A. Bertrand
C. Hueglin
X. Ge
U. Baltensperger
A. S. H. Prévôt
J. G. Slowik
Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet L. Qi
L. Qi
M. Chen
G. Stefenelli
V. Pospisilova
Y. Tong
A. Bertrand
C. Hueglin
X. Ge
U. Baltensperger
A. S. H. Prévôt
J. G. Slowik
author_sort L. Qi
title Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter
title_short Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter
title_full Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter
title_fullStr Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter
title_full_unstemmed Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter
title_sort organic aerosol source apportionment in zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (eesi-tof-ms) – part 2: biomass burning influences in winter
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2019-06-01
description <p>Real-time, in situ molecular composition measurements of the organic fraction of fine particulate matter (PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>) remain challenging, hindering a full understanding of the climate impacts and health effects of PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>. In particular, the thermal decomposition and ionization-induced fragmentation affecting current techniques has limited a detailed investigation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), which typically dominates OA. Here we deploy a novel extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) during winter 2017 in downtown Zurich, Switzerland, which overcomes these limitations, together with an Aerodyne high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-TOF-AMS) and supporting instrumentation. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) implemented within the Multilinear Engine (ME-2) program was applied to the EESI-TOF-MS data to quantify the primary and secondary contributions to OA. An 11-factor solution was selected as the best representation of the data, including five primary and six secondary factors. Primary factors showed influence from cooking, cigarette smoke, biomass burning (two factors) and a special local unknown event occurred only during two nights. Secondary factors were affected by biomass burning (three factors, distinguished by temperature and/or wind direction), organonitrates, monoterpene oxidation, and undetermined regional processing, in particular the contributions of wood combustion. While the AMS attributed slightly over half the OA mass to SOA but did not identify its source, the EESI-TOF-MS showed that most (<span class="inline-formula">&gt;70</span>&thinsp;%) of the SOA was derived from biomass burning. Together with significant contributions from less aged biomass burning factors identified by both AMS and EESI-TOF-MS, this firmly establishes biomass burning as the single most important contributor to OA mass at this site during winter. High correlation was obtained between EESI-TOF-MS and AMS PMF factors where specific analogues existed, as well as between total signal and POA–SOA apportionment. This suggests the EESI-TOF-MS apportionment in the current study can be approximately taken at face value, despite ion-by-ion differences in relative sensitivity. The apportionment of specific ions measured by the EESI-TOF-MS (e.g., levoglucosan, nitrocatechol, and selected organic acids) and utilization of a cluster analysis-based approach to identify key marker ions for the EESI-TOF-MS factors are investigated. The interpretability of the EESI-TOF-MS results and improved source separation relative to the AMS within this pilot campaign validate the EESI-TOF-MS as a promising approach to source apportionment and atmospheric composition research.</p>
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8037/2019/acp-19-8037-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lqi organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT lqi organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT mchen organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT gstefenelli organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT vpospisilova organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT ytong organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT abertrand organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT chueglin organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT xge organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT ubaltensperger organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT ashprevot organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
AT jgslowik organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter
_version_ 1725047673706250240
spelling doaj-bb641eeb3bc04ab3849d39d43a46595e2020-11-25T01:40:01ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242019-06-01198037806210.5194/acp-19-8037-2019Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winterL. Qi0L. Qi1M. Chen2G. Stefenelli3V. Pospisilova4Y. Tong5A. Bertrand6C. Hueglin7X. Ge8U. Baltensperger9A. S. H. Prévôt10J. G. Slowik11Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandNanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 21000 Nanjing, ChinaNanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 21000 Nanjing, ChinaLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandEMPA, Dübendorf 8600, SwitzerlandNanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 21000 Nanjing, ChinaLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, Switzerland<p>Real-time, in situ molecular composition measurements of the organic fraction of fine particulate matter (PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>) remain challenging, hindering a full understanding of the climate impacts and health effects of PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>. In particular, the thermal decomposition and ionization-induced fragmentation affecting current techniques has limited a detailed investigation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), which typically dominates OA. Here we deploy a novel extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) during winter 2017 in downtown Zurich, Switzerland, which overcomes these limitations, together with an Aerodyne high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-TOF-AMS) and supporting instrumentation. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) implemented within the Multilinear Engine (ME-2) program was applied to the EESI-TOF-MS data to quantify the primary and secondary contributions to OA. An 11-factor solution was selected as the best representation of the data, including five primary and six secondary factors. Primary factors showed influence from cooking, cigarette smoke, biomass burning (two factors) and a special local unknown event occurred only during two nights. Secondary factors were affected by biomass burning (three factors, distinguished by temperature and/or wind direction), organonitrates, monoterpene oxidation, and undetermined regional processing, in particular the contributions of wood combustion. While the AMS attributed slightly over half the OA mass to SOA but did not identify its source, the EESI-TOF-MS showed that most (<span class="inline-formula">&gt;70</span>&thinsp;%) of the SOA was derived from biomass burning. Together with significant contributions from less aged biomass burning factors identified by both AMS and EESI-TOF-MS, this firmly establishes biomass burning as the single most important contributor to OA mass at this site during winter. High correlation was obtained between EESI-TOF-MS and AMS PMF factors where specific analogues existed, as well as between total signal and POA–SOA apportionment. This suggests the EESI-TOF-MS apportionment in the current study can be approximately taken at face value, despite ion-by-ion differences in relative sensitivity. The apportionment of specific ions measured by the EESI-TOF-MS (e.g., levoglucosan, nitrocatechol, and selected organic acids) and utilization of a cluster analysis-based approach to identify key marker ions for the EESI-TOF-MS factors are investigated. The interpretability of the EESI-TOF-MS results and improved source separation relative to the AMS within this pilot campaign validate the EESI-TOF-MS as a promising approach to source apportionment and atmospheric composition research.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8037/2019/acp-19-8037-2019.pdf