Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter
<p>Real-time, in situ molecular composition measurements of the organic fraction of fine particulate matter (PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>) remain challenging, hindering a full understanding of the climate impacts and health effects of P...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8037/2019/acp-19-8037-2019.pdf |
id |
doaj-bb641eeb3bc04ab3849d39d43a46595e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
L. Qi L. Qi M. Chen G. Stefenelli V. Pospisilova Y. Tong A. Bertrand C. Hueglin X. Ge U. Baltensperger A. S. H. Prévôt J. G. Slowik |
spellingShingle |
L. Qi L. Qi M. Chen G. Stefenelli V. Pospisilova Y. Tong A. Bertrand C. Hueglin X. Ge U. Baltensperger A. S. H. Prévôt J. G. Slowik Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
author_facet |
L. Qi L. Qi M. Chen G. Stefenelli V. Pospisilova Y. Tong A. Bertrand C. Hueglin X. Ge U. Baltensperger A. S. H. Prévôt J. G. Slowik |
author_sort |
L. Qi |
title |
Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter |
title_short |
Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter |
title_full |
Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter |
title_fullStr |
Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winter |
title_sort |
organic aerosol source apportionment in zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (eesi-tof-ms) – part 2: biomass burning influences in winter |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
issn |
1680-7316 1680-7324 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
<p>Real-time, in situ molecular composition measurements of the organic
fraction of fine particulate matter (PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>) remain challenging,
hindering a full understanding of the climate impacts and health effects of
PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>. In particular, the thermal decomposition and ionization-induced
fragmentation affecting current techniques has limited a detailed
investigation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), which typically dominates
OA. Here we deploy a novel extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight
mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) during winter 2017 in downtown Zurich,
Switzerland, which overcomes these limitations, together with an Aerodyne
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-TOF-AMS) and
supporting instrumentation. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) implemented
within the Multilinear Engine (ME-2) program was applied to the EESI-TOF-MS data to
quantify the primary and secondary contributions to OA. An 11-factor
solution was selected as the best representation of the data, including five primary and six secondary factors. Primary factors showed influence from
cooking, cigarette smoke, biomass burning (two factors) and a special local
unknown event occurred only during two nights. Secondary factors were
affected by biomass burning (three factors, distinguished by temperature and/or
wind direction), organonitrates, monoterpene oxidation, and undetermined
regional processing, in particular the contributions of wood combustion.
While the AMS attributed slightly over half the OA mass to SOA but did not
identify its source, the EESI-TOF-MS showed that most (<span class="inline-formula">>70</span> %) of
the SOA was derived from biomass burning. Together with significant
contributions from less aged biomass burning factors identified by both AMS
and EESI-TOF-MS, this firmly establishes biomass burning as the single most
important contributor to OA mass at this site during winter. High
correlation was obtained between EESI-TOF-MS and AMS PMF factors where specific
analogues existed, as well as between total signal and POA–SOA
apportionment. This suggests the EESI-TOF-MS apportionment in the current study
can be approximately taken at face value, despite ion-by-ion differences in
relative sensitivity. The apportionment of specific ions measured by the
EESI-TOF-MS (e.g., levoglucosan, nitrocatechol, and selected organic acids) and
utilization of a cluster analysis-based approach to identify key marker ions
for the EESI-TOF-MS factors are investigated. The interpretability of the
EESI-TOF-MS results and improved source separation relative to the AMS within
this pilot campaign validate the EESI-TOF-MS as a promising approach to source
apportionment and atmospheric composition research.</p> |
url |
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8037/2019/acp-19-8037-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lqi organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT lqi organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT mchen organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT gstefenelli organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT vpospisilova organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT ytong organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT abertrand organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT chueglin organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT xge organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT ubaltensperger organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT ashprevot organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter AT jgslowik organicaerosolsourceapportionmentinzurichusinganextractiveelectrosprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometereesitofmspart2biomassburninginfluencesinwinter |
_version_ |
1725047673706250240 |
spelling |
doaj-bb641eeb3bc04ab3849d39d43a46595e2020-11-25T01:40:01ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242019-06-01198037806210.5194/acp-19-8037-2019Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) – Part 2: Biomass burning influences in winterL. Qi0L. Qi1M. Chen2G. Stefenelli3V. Pospisilova4Y. Tong5A. Bertrand6C. Hueglin7X. Ge8U. Baltensperger9A. S. H. Prévôt10J. G. Slowik11Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandNanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 21000 Nanjing, ChinaNanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 21000 Nanjing, ChinaLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandEMPA, Dübendorf 8600, SwitzerlandNanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 21000 Nanjing, ChinaLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, Switzerland<p>Real-time, in situ molecular composition measurements of the organic fraction of fine particulate matter (PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>) remain challenging, hindering a full understanding of the climate impacts and health effects of PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>. In particular, the thermal decomposition and ionization-induced fragmentation affecting current techniques has limited a detailed investigation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), which typically dominates OA. Here we deploy a novel extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) during winter 2017 in downtown Zurich, Switzerland, which overcomes these limitations, together with an Aerodyne high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-TOF-AMS) and supporting instrumentation. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) implemented within the Multilinear Engine (ME-2) program was applied to the EESI-TOF-MS data to quantify the primary and secondary contributions to OA. An 11-factor solution was selected as the best representation of the data, including five primary and six secondary factors. Primary factors showed influence from cooking, cigarette smoke, biomass burning (two factors) and a special local unknown event occurred only during two nights. Secondary factors were affected by biomass burning (three factors, distinguished by temperature and/or wind direction), organonitrates, monoterpene oxidation, and undetermined regional processing, in particular the contributions of wood combustion. While the AMS attributed slightly over half the OA mass to SOA but did not identify its source, the EESI-TOF-MS showed that most (<span class="inline-formula">>70</span> %) of the SOA was derived from biomass burning. Together with significant contributions from less aged biomass burning factors identified by both AMS and EESI-TOF-MS, this firmly establishes biomass burning as the single most important contributor to OA mass at this site during winter. High correlation was obtained between EESI-TOF-MS and AMS PMF factors where specific analogues existed, as well as between total signal and POA–SOA apportionment. This suggests the EESI-TOF-MS apportionment in the current study can be approximately taken at face value, despite ion-by-ion differences in relative sensitivity. The apportionment of specific ions measured by the EESI-TOF-MS (e.g., levoglucosan, nitrocatechol, and selected organic acids) and utilization of a cluster analysis-based approach to identify key marker ions for the EESI-TOF-MS factors are investigated. The interpretability of the EESI-TOF-MS results and improved source separation relative to the AMS within this pilot campaign validate the EESI-TOF-MS as a promising approach to source apportionment and atmospheric composition research.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/8037/2019/acp-19-8037-2019.pdf |