Evaluation of corneal elastic modulus based on Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology

Evaluation of corneal elastic modulus based on Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology

Abstract Background Corneal biomechanical properties are important for the diagnosis of corneal diseases, individualized design and prognosis of corneal surgery. Clinical available devices such as Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST) can provide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Xiao Qin, Lei Tian, Haixia Zhang, Xinyan Chen, Lin Li
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	BMC 2019-04-01
Series:	BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Subjects:	Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST) Reisner’s theory Cornea Elastic modulus Intraocular pressure (IOP)
Online Access:	http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12938-019-0662-1

Similar Items

Corneal biomechanical properties in myopic eyes evaluated via Scheimpflug imaging
by: A-Yong Yu, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Corneal Biomechanical Assessment with Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Imaging During Non-Contact Tonometry: A Prospective Review
by: Baptista PM, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Corneal biomechanical properties in healthy children measured by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology
by: Miao He, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties in a Selected Chinese Population, Measured Using the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology
by: Guo, L.-L, et al.
Published: (2022)

A novel method for quantifying the biomechanical parameters of orbital soft tissue using a corneal dynamic scheimpflug analyser: a retrospective study
by: Ho Sik Hwang, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)

Corneal Parameters in Healthy Subjects Assessed by Corvis ST
by: Ramin Salouti, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

A comparison of the corneal biomechanics in pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and healthy controls using Corvis® Scheimpflug Technology
by: Zia S Pradhan, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Varying Severities of Myopia
by: Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology evaluates corneal biomechanical properties in children with different refractive states
by: LI Fang, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Study of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with childhood glaucoma
by: Sara Garcia Caride, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

ESTIMATION OF MEAN CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS USING SIRIUS SCHEIMPFLUG–PLACIDO TOPOGRAPHER IN BASRAH
by: Aymen Majeed Fadil, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

Association between corneal biomechanical parameters and myopic refractive errors in young Indian individuals
by: Vaishal P Kenia, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Relationship Among Corneal Stiffness, Thickness, and Biomechanical Parameters Measured by Corvis ST, Pentacam and ORA in Keratoconus
by: Yu Zhao, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

The Role of Corneal Biomechanics in the Assessment of Ectasia Susceptibility Before Laser Vision Correction
by: Baptista PM, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Effect of 2% fluorescein on Scheimpflug central corneal thickness measurements
by: Stella Briggs, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

Repeatability and Interchangeability of Topometric, Anterior Chamber and Corneal Wavefront Data Between Two Scheimpflug Camera Devices
by: Gharieb HM, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Analysis of Corneal Distortion after Myopic PRK
by: Michele Lanza, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

Relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness measured by Corvis ST and UHR-OCT in keratoconus and normal eyes
by: Yong Li, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Corneal Aberrations in Keratoconus: A Pentacam Scheimpflug Imaging Study
by: Hamıdu Hamısı Gobeka, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Comparison of Confocal Microscopy and Scheimpflug Camera Findings in Avellino Corneal Dystrophy
by: Murat Küçükevcilioğlu, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01)

Corneal biomechanical properties after femtosecond laser assisted LASIK with the corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology and ocular response analyzer
by: Jing Li, et al.
Published: (2017-02-01)

Measurement of central corneal thickness and pre-corneal tear film thickness of rabbits using the Scheimpflug system
by: Jing Dong, et al.
Published: (2013-10-01)

Clinical and genetic investigation of amantadine-associated corneal edema
by: Hessen MM, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

One-Year Follow-Up of Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Accelerated Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking in Pediatric Patients With Progressive Keratoconus
by: Weijun Jian, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Scheimpflug vs Scanning-Slit Corneal Tomography: Comparison of Corneal and Anterior Chamber Tomography Indices for Repeatability and Agreement in Healthy Eyes
by: Kanellopoulos AJ
Published: (2020-09-01)

The changes of corneal biomechanical properties with long-term treatment of prostaglandin analogue measured by Corvis ST
by: Na Wu, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Single session, intrauser repeatability of anterior chamber biometric and corneal pachy-volumetric parameters using a new Scheimpflug + Placido device
by: Gaurav Prakash, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01)

An Analysis of Scheimpflug Holladay-Equivalent Keratometry Readings Following Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking
by: Ayhan Sağlık, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

The Influence of IOP, Corneal Stiffness, and Sclera on Corneal Deformation Response to an Air Puff Using the CorVis ST
by: Metzler, Kimberly M.
Published: (2015)

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
by: Ladi Jeevan, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

INFLUENCE OF TOPICAL ANAESTHETICS ON CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY
by: Claes Feinbaum
Published: (2015-12-01)

Influence of topical anaesthetics on Corneal Topography
by: Claes Feinbaum
Published: (2013-01-01)

Central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymetry, rotating scheimpflug camera, and scanning-slit topography exclusively in thin non-keratoconic corneas
by: Mehrdad Mohammadpour, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Asymmetric Visual Field Damage in Patients with Untreated Normal Tension Glaucoma
by: Bai-Bing Li, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Corneal biomechanical alterations after phacoemulsitication with 2.4mm corneal incision
by: Jun Yang, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Lens densitometry after corneal cross-linking in patients with keratoconus using a Scheimpflug camera
by: Alireza Baradaran-Rafii, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

A comparative study of autokeratometric and Scheimpflug keratometric measurements of the anterior corneal surface: results for a single subject
by: S. Mathebula, et al.
Published: (2007-12-01)

Sirius Scheimpflug–Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis
by: Yili Jin, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Development of a classification system based on corneal biomechanical properties using artificial intelligence predicting keratoconus severity
by: Robert Herber, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Concordance between Goldmann, Icare Pro®, Corvis ST® and Tonopen® tonometry, and their correlation with corneal thickness
by: Patricia Hernandez Mendieta, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)