Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation

We review and compare our experience with tricuspid ring annuloplasty between usage of the Cosgrove-Edwards flexible band and the MC3 rigid ring for repair of functional tricuspid regurgitation to determine the efficacy and mid-term durability of tricuspid annuloplasty. 117 patients with functional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanji Kawachi, Teruya Nakamura, Hironori Izutani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Touch Medical Media 2010-09-01
Series:Heart International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/hi/article/view/2004
id doaj-bb835594ecb549b4a738c750dc4331be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb835594ecb549b4a738c750dc4331be2020-11-25T01:27:24ZengTouch Medical MediaHeart International1826-18682036-25792010-09-0152e13e1310.4081/hi.2010.e13Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitationKanji KawachiTeruya NakamuraHironori IzutaniWe review and compare our experience with tricuspid ring annuloplasty between usage of the Cosgrove-Edwards flexible band and the MC3 rigid ring for repair of functional tricuspid regurgitation to determine the efficacy and mid-term durability of tricuspid annuloplasty. 117 patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation undergoing open heart surgery and tricuspid valve repair from May 2005 to December 2007 were reviewed. The flexible bands were used in thirty five patients before October 2006. Since then, the rigid rings were used in the next consecutive eighty two cases. Echocardiographic evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in follow-up schedule. The degree of tricuspid regurgitation was reduced from 2.80±0.67 to 0.71±1.0 (regurgitation severity grade: 0 to 4) in the patients with flexible bands at discharge. It was from 2.68±0.70 to 0.22±0.60 in the patients with rigid rings. At thirty six months postoperative period, tricuspid regurgitation grades in patients with flexible bands and rigid rings were 0.80±0.95 and 0.36±0.77, respectively. Freedom from recurrent tricuspid regurgitation (grade 2 or 3) in patients with flexible bands and rigid rings were 68.6% and 87.8%, respectively. Recurrent tricuspid regurgitation was significantly lower in the patients with rigid rings. Although both flexible band and rigid ring annuloplasty provide low rate of recurrent tricuspid regurgitation, rigid ring annuloplasty might be more effective than flexible band annuloplasty for decreasing functional tricuspid regurgitation in immediate and mid-term postoperative periods.http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/hi/article/view/2004Tricuspid valveAnnuloplastyValve repairValve surgeryHeart valve
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kanji Kawachi
Teruya Nakamura
Hironori Izutani
spellingShingle Kanji Kawachi
Teruya Nakamura
Hironori Izutani
Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation
Heart International
Tricuspid valve
Annuloplasty
Valve repair
Valve surgery
Heart valve
author_facet Kanji Kawachi
Teruya Nakamura
Hironori Izutani
author_sort Kanji Kawachi
title Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation
title_short Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation
title_full Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation
title_fullStr Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation
title_full_unstemmed Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation
title_sort flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation
publisher Touch Medical Media
series Heart International
issn 1826-1868
2036-2579
publishDate 2010-09-01
description We review and compare our experience with tricuspid ring annuloplasty between usage of the Cosgrove-Edwards flexible band and the MC3 rigid ring for repair of functional tricuspid regurgitation to determine the efficacy and mid-term durability of tricuspid annuloplasty. 117 patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation undergoing open heart surgery and tricuspid valve repair from May 2005 to December 2007 were reviewed. The flexible bands were used in thirty five patients before October 2006. Since then, the rigid rings were used in the next consecutive eighty two cases. Echocardiographic evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in follow-up schedule. The degree of tricuspid regurgitation was reduced from 2.80±0.67 to 0.71±1.0 (regurgitation severity grade: 0 to 4) in the patients with flexible bands at discharge. It was from 2.68±0.70 to 0.22±0.60 in the patients with rigid rings. At thirty six months postoperative period, tricuspid regurgitation grades in patients with flexible bands and rigid rings were 0.80±0.95 and 0.36±0.77, respectively. Freedom from recurrent tricuspid regurgitation (grade 2 or 3) in patients with flexible bands and rigid rings were 68.6% and 87.8%, respectively. Recurrent tricuspid regurgitation was significantly lower in the patients with rigid rings. Although both flexible band and rigid ring annuloplasty provide low rate of recurrent tricuspid regurgitation, rigid ring annuloplasty might be more effective than flexible band annuloplasty for decreasing functional tricuspid regurgitation in immediate and mid-term postoperative periods.
topic Tricuspid valve
Annuloplasty
Valve repair
Valve surgery
Heart valve
url http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/hi/article/view/2004
work_keys_str_mv AT kanjikawachi flexiblebandversusrigidringannuloplastyforfunctionaltricuspidregurgitation
AT teruyanakamura flexiblebandversusrigidringannuloplastyforfunctionaltricuspidregurgitation
AT hironoriizutani flexiblebandversusrigidringannuloplastyforfunctionaltricuspidregurgitation
_version_ 1725105875088048128