Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries

Pelagic gillnet (driftnet) fisheries account for some 34% of Indian Ocean tuna catches. We combined published results from 10 bycatch sampling programmes (1981-2016) in Australia, Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan to estimate bycatch rates for cetaceans across all Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries. Es...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anderson, RC, Herrera, M, Ilangakoon, AD, Koya, KM, Moazzam, M, Mustika, PL, Sutaria, DN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Inter-Research 2020-01-01
Series:Endangered Species Research
Online Access:https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v41/p39-53/
id doaj-bba60a498936437e82209cf0657dd9f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bba60a498936437e82209cf0657dd9f92020-11-25T03:58:17ZengInter-ResearchEndangered Species Research1863-54071613-47962020-01-0141395310.3354/esr01008Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheriesAnderson, RCHerrera, MIlangakoon, ADKoya, KMMoazzam, MMustika, PLSutaria, DNPelagic gillnet (driftnet) fisheries account for some 34% of Indian Ocean tuna catches. We combined published results from 10 bycatch sampling programmes (1981-2016) in Australia, Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan to estimate bycatch rates for cetaceans across all Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries. Estimated cetacean bycatch peaked at almost 100000 ind. yr-1 during 2004-2006, but has declined by over 15% since then, despite an increase in tuna gillnet fishing effort. These fisheries caught an estimated cumulative total of 4.1 million small cetaceans between 1950 and 2018. These bycatch estimates take little or no account of cetaceans caught by gillnet but not landed, of delayed mortality or sub-lethal impacts on cetaceans (especially whales) that escape from gillnets, of mortality associated with ghost nets, of harpoon catches made from gillnetters, or of mortality from other tuna fisheries. Total cetacean mortality from Indian Ocean tuna fisheries may therefore be substantially higher than estimated here. Declining cetacean bycatch rates suggest that such levels of mortality are not sustainable. Indeed, mean small cetacean abundance may currently be 13% of pre-fishery levels. None of these estimates are precise, but they do demonstrate the likely order of magnitude of the issue. Countries with the largest current gillnet catches of tuna, and thus the ones likely to have the largest cetacean bycatch are (in order): Iran, Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Oman, Yemen, UAE and Tanzania. These 9 countries together may account for roughly 96% of all cetacean bycatch from tuna gillnet fisheries across the Indian Ocean.https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v41/p39-53/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anderson, RC
Herrera, M
Ilangakoon, AD
Koya, KM
Moazzam, M
Mustika, PL
Sutaria, DN
spellingShingle Anderson, RC
Herrera, M
Ilangakoon, AD
Koya, KM
Moazzam, M
Mustika, PL
Sutaria, DN
Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries
Endangered Species Research
author_facet Anderson, RC
Herrera, M
Ilangakoon, AD
Koya, KM
Moazzam, M
Mustika, PL
Sutaria, DN
author_sort Anderson, RC
title Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries
title_short Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries
title_full Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries
title_fullStr Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries
title_sort cetacean bycatch in indian ocean tuna gillnet fisheries
publisher Inter-Research
series Endangered Species Research
issn 1863-5407
1613-4796
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Pelagic gillnet (driftnet) fisheries account for some 34% of Indian Ocean tuna catches. We combined published results from 10 bycatch sampling programmes (1981-2016) in Australia, Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan to estimate bycatch rates for cetaceans across all Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries. Estimated cetacean bycatch peaked at almost 100000 ind. yr-1 during 2004-2006, but has declined by over 15% since then, despite an increase in tuna gillnet fishing effort. These fisheries caught an estimated cumulative total of 4.1 million small cetaceans between 1950 and 2018. These bycatch estimates take little or no account of cetaceans caught by gillnet but not landed, of delayed mortality or sub-lethal impacts on cetaceans (especially whales) that escape from gillnets, of mortality associated with ghost nets, of harpoon catches made from gillnetters, or of mortality from other tuna fisheries. Total cetacean mortality from Indian Ocean tuna fisheries may therefore be substantially higher than estimated here. Declining cetacean bycatch rates suggest that such levels of mortality are not sustainable. Indeed, mean small cetacean abundance may currently be 13% of pre-fishery levels. None of these estimates are precise, but they do demonstrate the likely order of magnitude of the issue. Countries with the largest current gillnet catches of tuna, and thus the ones likely to have the largest cetacean bycatch are (in order): Iran, Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Oman, Yemen, UAE and Tanzania. These 9 countries together may account for roughly 96% of all cetacean bycatch from tuna gillnet fisheries across the Indian Ocean.
url https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v41/p39-53/
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonrc cetaceanbycatchinindianoceantunagillnetfisheries
AT herreram cetaceanbycatchinindianoceantunagillnetfisheries
AT ilangakoonad cetaceanbycatchinindianoceantunagillnetfisheries
AT koyakm cetaceanbycatchinindianoceantunagillnetfisheries
AT moazzamm cetaceanbycatchinindianoceantunagillnetfisheries
AT mustikapl cetaceanbycatchinindianoceantunagillnetfisheries
AT sutariadn cetaceanbycatchinindianoceantunagillnetfisheries
_version_ 1724458266044399616