Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England

<strong>Aim: </strong>To explore tobacco profit margins and sales among small retailers in England. <strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews with managers/owners of 62 small retail shops that sold tobacco in disadvantaged areas of Newcastle and London, England. The interviews inc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara C. Hitchman, Robert Calder, Catriona Rooke, Ann McNeill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2016-03-01
Series:AIMS Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aimspress.com/aimsph/article/678/fulltext.html
id doaj-bbfd76576b674536982d41190d9e0d38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bbfd76576b674536982d41190d9e0d382020-11-24T20:44:32ZengAIMS PressAIMS Public Health2327-89942016-03-013111011510.3934/publichealth.2016.1.110publichealth-03-00110Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of EnglandSara C. HitchmanRobert Calder0Catriona Rooke1Ann McNeill. Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, Englan. Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, Englan<strong>Aim: </strong>To explore tobacco profit margins and sales among small retailers in England. <strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews with managers/owners of 62 small retail shops that sold tobacco in disadvantaged areas of Newcastle and London, England. The interviews included questions about tobacco sales and profit margins, and interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales. <strong>Results: </strong>The majority of retailers (89%) reported low overall profit margins on tobacco sales (&lt; 6%). The most common response was a profit margin of 4–6%,with some reporting lower margins for price-marked packs of cigarettes (1–6%) and higher margins for non-price marked or premium brands (7% to over 10%). A few mentioned higher profit margins for e-cigarettes. Despite this, most thought tobacco sales were important (90%), and attributed this reliance to footfall (81%), i.e., customers purchasing tobacco also purchasing other products. 42% of retailers expressed interest in reducing their reliance on tobacco sales. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small retailers report low tobacco profit margins, but high reliance on tobacco sales because of footfall. Retailer interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales warrants further research into opportunities for disinvestment. Additionally, retailers’ belief that they are reliant on tobacco sales because of footfall should be further investigated.http://www.aimspress.com/aimsph/article/678/fulltext.htmltobaccotobacco retailerstobacco economicstobacco industry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sara C. Hitchman
Robert Calder
Catriona Rooke
Ann McNeill
spellingShingle Sara C. Hitchman
Robert Calder
Catriona Rooke
Ann McNeill
Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England
AIMS Public Health
tobacco
tobacco retailers
tobacco economics
tobacco industry
author_facet Sara C. Hitchman
Robert Calder
Catriona Rooke
Ann McNeill
author_sort Sara C. Hitchman
title Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England
title_short Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England
title_full Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England
title_fullStr Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England
title_full_unstemmed Small Retailers’ Tobacco Sales and Profit Margins in Two Disadvantaged Areas of England
title_sort small retailers’ tobacco sales and profit margins in two disadvantaged areas of england
publisher AIMS Press
series AIMS Public Health
issn 2327-8994
publishDate 2016-03-01
description <strong>Aim: </strong>To explore tobacco profit margins and sales among small retailers in England. <strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews with managers/owners of 62 small retail shops that sold tobacco in disadvantaged areas of Newcastle and London, England. The interviews included questions about tobacco sales and profit margins, and interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales. <strong>Results: </strong>The majority of retailers (89%) reported low overall profit margins on tobacco sales (&lt; 6%). The most common response was a profit margin of 4–6%,with some reporting lower margins for price-marked packs of cigarettes (1–6%) and higher margins for non-price marked or premium brands (7% to over 10%). A few mentioned higher profit margins for e-cigarettes. Despite this, most thought tobacco sales were important (90%), and attributed this reliance to footfall (81%), i.e., customers purchasing tobacco also purchasing other products. 42% of retailers expressed interest in reducing their reliance on tobacco sales. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small retailers report low tobacco profit margins, but high reliance on tobacco sales because of footfall. Retailer interest in reducing reliance on tobacco sales warrants further research into opportunities for disinvestment. Additionally, retailers’ belief that they are reliant on tobacco sales because of footfall should be further investigated.
topic tobacco
tobacco retailers
tobacco economics
tobacco industry
url http://www.aimspress.com/aimsph/article/678/fulltext.html
work_keys_str_mv AT sarachitchman smallretailerstobaccosalesandprofitmarginsintwodisadvantagedareasofengland
AT robertcalder smallretailerstobaccosalesandprofitmarginsintwodisadvantagedareasofengland
AT catrionarooke smallretailerstobaccosalesandprofitmarginsintwodisadvantagedareasofengland
AT annmcneill smallretailerstobaccosalesandprofitmarginsintwodisadvantagedareasofengland
_version_ 1716817116470968320